128,793 research outputs found

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    No full text
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Pentagonica Schmidt-Goebel 1846

    No full text
    Genus Pentagonica Schmidt-Goebel, 1846 37. Pentagonica venusta Andrewes, 1933 c: 17-18. (Fig. 4 b) Yellow label stating “Co-type”. White label stating. “Collection locality; INDIA: Tamilnadu, S. Mangalore, Madras;” White label stating. “ 22. v. 1930; collected by JCM Gardner.” Remarks. Left middle leg is missing.Published as part of Faisal, Mohammad & Singh, Sudhir, 2014, Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India), pp. 331-358 in Zootaxa 3786 (3) on pages 337-338, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/24964

    Welcome to Huntington,W.Va. Oct. 10, 1910

    No full text
    Welcome to Huntington,W.Va. Oct. 10, 1910 etched print, b&w Signed and numbered 65 of 75 print by William D. Goebel for Anderson-Newcomb. Caption states: looking down 3rd Avenue from Ninth Street.https://mds.marshall.edu/anderson_newcomb_co_collections/1044/thumbnail.jp

    Eustra plagiata Schmidt-Goebel 1846

    No full text
    <i>Eustra plagiata</i> Schmidt-Goebel, 1846 <p>DIAGNOSE</p> <p>Édéage sensiblement comme celui des espèces précédentes ou à peine plus allongé, le paramère gauche particulièrement long et étroit, à extrémité émoussée ou arrondie (Fig. 6F, G). Genitalia femelles orthotopiques, les gonopodes fusiformes mais étroits et étirés, avec un gonostyle terminal (Fig. 9I): la spermathèque membraneuse, assez courte, un peu annelée (Fig. 11G).</p> <p> <i>Eustra plagiata plagiata</i> Schmidt-Goebel, 1846 <i>Eustra plagiata</i> Schmidt-Goebel, 1846: 66. — Chaudoir 1854: 310; 1868: 71.</p> <p> TYPES. — L’espèce <i>E. plagiata</i> Schmidt-Goebel, 1846, étant polytypique, il est souhaitable de désigner le lectotype du taxon nominal pour mieux fixer la nomenclature et éviter toute équivoque.</p> <p> Lectotype (présente désignation): 1, « Lectotype [étiquette rouge] / <i>Birma, Helfer</i> [étiquette blanche] / <i>plagiata Sch. G.</i>, col. Helfer [étiquette blanche] / Mus. Pragense, coll. Helfer [étiquette blanche] / Mus. Nat. Pragae, Inv. <i>26475</i> [étiquette orange] / Typus! teste Dr. J. Obenberger [étiquette rouge] / <i>Eustra plagiata Schm. -G., Lectotype</i>, Th. Deuve dés. 1996 [étiquette blanche] », <i>ex</i> coll. Helfer (MNP).</p> <p> Paralectotype: 1, Birmanie, Tenasserim, <i>ex</i> coll. Helfer (MNP Inv. n°26474).</p> <p> DISTRIBUTION. — <b>Birmanie, Tenasserim.</b></p> <p>DIAGNOSE</p> <p>Pronotum modérément cintré en arrière, les côtés denticulés et assez peu sinués avant les angles basaux, qui sont obtus, peu saillants (lp/Lp = 1,50). Paramère gauche de l’édéage rétréci vers l’apex (Fig. 6G).</p>Published as part of <i>Deuve, Thierry, 2001, Le genre Eustra Schmidt-Goebel, 1846, insectes (Coleoptera, Paussidae, Ozaeninae) à genitalia femelles orthotopiques, pp. 547-578 in Zoosystema 23 (3)</i> on page 574, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5391021">10.5281/zenodo.5391021</a&gt

    sj-docx-1-han-10.1177_15589447221096707 – Supplemental material for Parent Perspectives for Type B Ulnar Polydactyly Management

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-han-10.1177_15589447221096707 for Parent Perspectives for Type B Ulnar Polydactyly Management by Gunnar J. Goebel, Scott N. Loewenstein and Joshua M. Adkinson in HAND</p

    Pragmatic Case Studies as a Source of Unity in Applied Psychology

    No full text
    To unify or not to unify applied psychology: that is the question. In this article we review pendulum swings in the historical efforts to answer this question—from a comprehensive, positivist, “top-down,” deductive yes between the 1930s and the early 60s, to a postmodern no since then. A rationale and proposal for a limited, “bottom-up,” inductive yes in applied psychology is then presented, employing a case-based paradigm that integrates both positivist and postmodern themes and components. This paradigm is labeled “pragmatic psychology” and, its specific use of case studies, the “Pragmatic Case Study Method” (“PCS Method”). We call for the creation of peer-reviewed journal-databases of pragmatic case studies as a foundational source of unifying applied knowledge in our discipline. As one example, the potential of the PCS Method for unifying different angles of theoretical regard is illustrated in an area of applied psychology, psychotherapy, via the case of Mrs. B. The article then turns to the broader historical and epistemological arguments for the unifying nature of the PCS Method in both applied and basic psychology.Peer reviewe

    Prothyma (Paraprothyma) exornata Schmidt-Goebel 1846

    No full text
    &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;112.&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt; &lt;i&gt;Prothyma&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;i&gt;Paraprothyma&lt;/i&gt;) &lt;i&gt;exornata&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Schmidt-Goebel, 1846 (Fig. 112, 307)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;i&gt;Prothyma&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;i&gt;Paraprothyma&lt;/i&gt;) &lt;i&gt;exornata&lt;/i&gt;: Rivalier 1964: 145-147; Fedorenko and Matalin 2011: 126-128.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Published data.&lt;/b&gt; SOUTHEAST: Tay Ninh (Rivalier 1964: 147); Dong Nai (Nam Cat Tien National Park) (Fedorenko and Matalin 2011: 126-128).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;New records.&lt;/b&gt; SOUTHEAST: Dong Nai, 120 km NNE of Ho Chi Minh, Nam Cat Tien National Park, leg. A. Napolov, 15.vi.1995, 1 female (ANLC).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Distribution.&lt;/b&gt; Vietnam (Tay Ninh, Dong Nai), Laos (Borikhamxay), Cambodia,? Thailand,? Myanmar.&lt;/p&gt;Published as part of &lt;i&gt;Wiesner, Jürgen, Bandinelli, Aligi &amp; Matalin, Andrey, 2017, Notes on the tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cicindelinae) of Vietnam. 135. Contribution towards the knowledge of Cicindelinae, pp. 1-131 in Insecta Mundi 2017 (589)&lt;/i&gt; on page 41, DOI: &lt;a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5169363"&gt;10.5281/zenodo.5169363&lt;/a&gt
    corecore