1,721,000 research outputs found
Coherent conditional probability in a fuzzy logic setting
Very recently, a (fuzzy modal) logic to reason about coherent conditional probability, in the sense of de Finetti, has been introduced by the authors. Under this approach, a conditional probability μ (· ·) is taken as a primitive notion defined over conditional events of the form "phi; given Ψ", φ Ψ for short, where Ψ is not the impossible event. The logic, called FCP(Ł∏), exploits an idea already used by Hájek and colleagues to define a logic for (unconditional) probability in the framework of fuzzy logics. Namely, we take the probability of the conditional event "φ Ψ" as the truth-value of the (fuzzy) modal proposition P (φ Ψ), read as "φ Ψ is probable". The logic FCP(Ł∏), which is built up over the many-valued logic Ł∏1/2 (a logic which combines the well-known Łukasiewicz and Product fuzzy logics), was shown to be complete for modal theories with respect to the class of probabilistic Kripke structures induced by coherent conditional probabilities. Indeed, checking coherence of a (generalized) probability assessment to an arbitrary family of conditional events becomes tantamount to checking consistency of a suitably defined theory over the logic FCP(Ł∏). In this paper we provide further results for the logic FCP(Ł∏). In particular, we extend the previous completeness result by allowing the presence of non-modal formulas in the theories, which are used to describe logical relationships among events. This increases the knowledge modelling power of FCP(Ł∏). Then, we improve the results concerning checking consistency of suitably defined theories in FCP(Ł∏) to determine coherence by showing parallel results w.r.t. the notion of generalized coherence when dealing with imprecise assessments. Moreover we also show and discuss compactness results for our logic. Finally, FCP(Ł∏) is shown to be a powerful tool for knowledge representation. Indeed, following ideas already investigated in the related literature, we show how FCP(Ł∏) allows the definition of suitable notions of default rules which enjoy the core properties of nonmonotonic reasoning characterizing system P and R. © 2006 Oxford University Press
On the logical formalization of possibilistic counterparts of states over n-valued Łukasiewicz events
Possibility and necessity measures are commonly defined over Boolean algebras. This work considers a generalization of these kinds of measures over MV-algebras as a possibilistic counterpart of the (probabilistic) notion of state on MV-algebras. Two classes of possibilistic states over MV-algebras of functions are characterized in terms of (generalized) Sugeno integrals. For reasoning about these representable classes of possibilistic states, we introduce many-valued modal logics based on the Rational Łukasiewicz Logic, that are shown to be complete with respect to corresponding classes of Kripke models equipped with those states
Logics for belief functions on MV-algebras
In this paper we present a generalization of belief functions over fuzzy events. In particular we focus on belief functions defined in the algebraic framework of finite MV-algebras of fuzzy sets. We introduce a fuzzy modal logic to formalize reasoning with belief functions on many-valued events. We prove, among other results, that several different notions of belief functions can be characterized in a quite uniform way, just by slightly modifying the complete axiomatization of one of the modal logics involved in the definition of our formalism
Geometrical aspects of possibility measures on finite domain MV-clans
In this paper, we study generalized possibility and necessity measures on MV-algebras of [0, 1]-valued functions (MV-clans) in the framework of idempotent mathematics, where the usual field of reals ℝ is replaced by the max-plus semiring ℝ max We prove results about extendability of partial assessments to possibility and necessity measures, and characterize the geometrical properties of the space of homogeneous possibility measures. The aim of the present paper is also to support the idea that idempotent mathematics is the natural framework to develop the theory of possibility and necessity measures, in the same way classical mathematics serves as a natural setting for probability theory
Extending possibilistic logic over Gödel logic
In this paper we present several fuzzy logics trying to capture different notions of necessity (in the sense of possibility theory) for Gödel logic formulas. Based on different characterizations of necessity measures on fuzzy sets, a group of logics with Kripke style semantics is built over a restricted language, namely, a two-level language composed of non-modal and modal formulas, the latter, moreover, not allowing for nested applications of the modal operator N. Completeness and some computational complexity results are shown
A logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation: Formalization and logical properties
In the last decade defeasible argumentation frameworks have evolved to become a sound setting to formalize commonsense, qualitative reasoning. The logic programming paradigm has shown to be particularly useful for developing different argument-based frameworks on the basis of different variants of logic programming which incorporate defeasible rules. Most of such frameworks, however, are unable to deal with both explicit uncertainty and vague knowledge, as defeasibility is directly encoded in the object language. This paper presents possibilistic defeasible logic programming (P-DeLP), a new logic programming language which combines features from argumentation theory and logic programming, incorporating as well the treatment of possibilistic uncertainty. Such features are formalized on the basis of PGL, a possibilistic logic based on Gödel fuzzy logic. One of the applications of P-DeLP is providing an intelligent agent with non-monotonic, argumentative inference capabilities. In this paper we also provide a better understanding of such capabilities by defining two non-monotonic operators which model the expansion of a given program by adding new weighed facts associated with argument conclusions and warranted literals, respectively. Different logical properties for the proposed operators are studied.Fil: Alsinet, Teresa. Universidad de Lleida; EspañaFil: Chesñevar, Carlos Iván. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; ArgentinaFil: Godo, Lluís. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; EspañaFil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentin
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
