1,720,981 research outputs found
MLaaS4HEP: Machine Learning as a Service for HEP
Full text linkMachine Learning (ML) will play a significant role in the success of the upcoming High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) program at CERN. An unprecedented amount of data at the exascale will be collected by LHC experiments in the next decade, and this effort will require novel approaches to train and use ML models. In this paper, we discuss a Machine Learning as a Service pipeline for HEP (MLaaS4HEP) which provides three independent layers: a data streaming layer to read High-Energy Physics (HEP) data in their native ROOT data format; a data training layer to train ML models using distributed ROOT files; a data inference layer to serve predictions using pre-trained ML models via HTTP protocol. Such modular design opens up the possibility to train data at large scale by reading ROOT files from remote storage facilities, e.g., World-Wide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG) infrastructure, and feed the data to the user’s favorite ML framework. The inference layer implemented as TensorFlow as a Service (TFaaS) may provide an easy access to pre-trained ML models in existing infrastructure and applications inside or outside of the HEP domain. In particular, we demonstrate the usage of the MLaaS4HEP architecture for a physics use-case, namely, the ̄
Higgs analysis in CMS originally performed using custom made Ntuples. We provide details on the training of the ML model using distributed ROOT files, discuss the performance of the MLaaS and TFaaS approaches for the selected physics analysis, and compare the results with traditional methods
Prototype of a cloud native solution of Machine Learning as Service for HEP
Full text linkTo favor the usage of Machine Learning (ML) techniques in High-Energy Physics (HEP) analyses it would be useful to have a service allowing to perform the entire ML pipeline (in terms of reading the data, training a ML model, and serving predictions) directly using ROOT files of arbitrary size from local or remote distributed data sources. The MLaaS4HEP framework aims to provide such kind of solution. It was successfully validated with a CMS physics use case which gave important feedback about the needs of analysts. For instance, we introduced the possibility for the user to provide pre-processing operations, such as defining new branches and applying cuts. To provide a real service for the user and to integrate it into the INFN Cloud, we started working on MLaaS4HEP cloudification. This would allow to use cloud resources and to work in a distributed environment. In this work, we provide updates on this topic, and in particular, we discuss our first working prototype of the service. It includes an OAuth2 proxy server as authentication/authorization layer, a MLaaS4HEP server, an XRootD proxy server for enabling access to remote ROOT data, and the TensorFlow as a Service (TFaaS) service in charge of the inference phase. With this architecture the user is able to submit ML pipelines, after being authenticated and authorized, using local or remote ROOT files simply using HTTP call
Cloud native approach for Machine Learning as a Service for High Energy Physics
Full text linkNowadays Machine Learning (ML) techniques are widely adopted in many areas of High Energy Physics (HEP) and certainly will play a significant role also in the upcoming High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) upgrade foreseen at CERN. A huge amount of data will be produced by LHC and collected by the experiments, facing challenges at the exascale.
Here, we present Machine Learning as a Service solution for HEP (MLaaS4HEP) to perform an entire ML pipeline (in terms of reading data, processing data, training ML models, serving predictions) in a completely model-agnostic fashion, directly using ROOT files of arbitrary size from local or distributed data sources.
With the new version of MLaaS4HEP code based on uproot4, we provide new features to improve users’ experience with the framework and their workflows, e.g. users can provide some preprocessing operations to be applied to ROOT data before starting the ML pipeline. Then our approach is extended to use local and cloud resources via HTTP proxy which allows physicists to submit their workflows using the HTTP protocol. We discuss how this pipeline could be enabled in the INFN Cloud Provider and what could be the final architecture
Prototype of Machine Learning “as a Service” for CMS Physics in Signal vs Background discrimination
No full textExploring Patterns and Correlations in CMS Computing Operations Data with Big Data Analytics Techniques
No full textMachine Learning as a Service for High Energy Physics on heterogeneous computing resources
Full text linkMachine Learning (ML) techniques in the High-Energy Physics (HEP) domain are ubiquitous and will play a significant role also in the upcoming High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) upgrade foreseen at CERN: a huge amount of data will be produced by LHC and collected by the ex- periments, facing challenges at the exascale. Despite ML models are successfully applied in many use-cases (online and offline reconstruction, particle identification, detector simulation, Monte Carlo generation, just to name a few) there is a constant seek for scalable, performant, and production-quality operations of ML-enabled workflows. In addition, the scenario is complicated by the gap among HEP physicists and ML experts, caused by the specificity of some parts of the HEP typical workflows and solutions, and by the difficulty to formulate HEP problems in a way that match the skills of the Computer Science (CS) and ML community and hence its potential ability to step in and help. Among other factors, one of the technical obstacles resides in the difference of data-formats used by ML-practitioners and physicists, where the former use mostly flat-format data representations while the latter use to store data in tree-based objects via the ROOT data format. Another obstacle to further development of ML techniques in HEP resides in the difficulty to secure the adequate computing resources for training and inference of ML models, in a scalable and transparent way in terms of CPU vs GPU vs TPU vs other resources, as well as local vs cloud resources. This yields a technical barrier that prevents a relatively large portion of HEP physicists from fully accessing the potential of ML-enabled systems for scientific research. In order to close this gap, a Machine Learning as a Service for HEP (MLaaS4HEP) solution is presented as a product of R&D activities within the CMS experiment. It offers a service that is capable to directly read ROOT-based data, use the ML solution provided by the user, and ultimately serve predictions by pre-trained ML models “as a service” accessible via HTTP protocol. This solution can be used by physicists or experts outside of HEP domain and it provides access to local or remote data storage without requiring any modification or integration with the experiment specific framework. Moreover, MLaaS4HEP is built with a modular design allowing independent resource allocation that opens up a possibility to train ML models on PB-size datasets remotely accessible from the WLCG sites without physically downloading data into local storage.
To prove the feasibility and utility of the MLaaS4HEP service with large datasets and thus be ready for the next future when an increase of data produced is expected, an exploration of different hardware resources is required. In particular, this work aims to provide the MLaaS4HEP service transparent access to heterogeneous resources, which opens up the usage of more powerful resources without requiring any effort from the user side during the access and use phase
Big Data Analysis for Predictive Maintenance at the INFN-CNAF Data Center using Machine Learning Approaches
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
