1,720,956 research outputs found
Analysis of disassembly parameters in repairability scores: limitations for engineering design and suggestions for improvement
No full textIn the last years, new standards (e.g., the EN4555X series) and indices (i.e., RSS, eDiM,) have been published to include repairability aspects in product design. These indices are very useful in the design phase to characterize the product and to understand the ability of products to be repaired, reused, upgraded, and recycled. However, the way how these indices have been developed presents some issues that can lead to a wrong assessment/evaluation and result interpretation. This work analyses the main shortcomings encountered in the assessment of the disassembly index in the RSS score providing useful guidelines to improve them. The study has been carried out based on a set of laboratory tests and results analysis performed on cooking appliances (e.g., ovens, hobs, hoods). Nine issues related to the disassembly index have been highlighted including a focus on the impacted parameters. The work provides a useful base to enhance the studies related to product disassembly for repairability as well as to update the standard related to repairability and to make use of this index in the early phase of product design
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Design metrics to normalize and compare LCA results in household appliance sector: outcomes from literature analysis
Full text linkNowadays, household appliance manufacturers shall adapt their engineering methods and tools to meet environmental concerns. Despite the environmental assessment of products and services is usually carried out based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) standardized approach (e.g., ISO14040/14044), numerous assumptions are up to practitioners' discretion, such as functional unit, system boundaries, or allocation method. These choices may lead to a results discrepancy between equivalent studies, even if similar products are considered. The goal of this work is to present a method for determining appropriate metrics (indices) that enable designers to compare the findings of LCA analysis carried out in the context of home appliances. The indices refer to the cooker hoods family and they were developed through a systematic literature review. LCA studies carried out from 2006 to 2022 were the basis for the identification of design features and parameters that allow the normalization of results retrieved in different studies. These features served as the basis for the indices formulation, enabling an accurate comparison of appliances from the same family. The application of these indices, according to the results, makes LCA evaluations of cooker hood models with different performances and design factors comparable. Finally, the same approach can be adopted to create a framework and a useful guide to conduct future LCA studies for other household appliance families with the aim to provide a normalization basis to compare product design alternatives
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
