1,720,961 research outputs found

    The Role of PET Imaging in Patients with Prion Disease: A Literature Review

    No full text
    Prion diseases are rare, rapidly progressive, and fatal incurable degenerative brain disorders caused by the misfolding of a normal protein called PrPC into an abnormal protein called PrPSc. Their highly variable clinical presentation mimics various degenerative and non-degenerative brain disorders, making diagnosis a significant challenge for neurologists. Currently, definitive diagnosis relies on post-mortem examination of nervous tissue to detect the pathogenic prion protein. The current diagnostic criteria are limited. While structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the gold standard imaging modality for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) diagnosis, positron emission tomography (PET) using 18fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and other radiotracers have demonstrated promising potential in the diagnostic assessment of prion disease. In this context, a comprehensive and updated review exclusively focused on PET imaging in prion diseases is still lacking. We review the current value of PET imaging with 18F-FDG and non-FDG tracers in the diagnostic management of prion diseases. From the collected data, 18F-FDG PET mainly reveals cortical and subcortical hypometabolic areas in prion disease, although fails to identify typical pattern or laterality abnormalities to differentiate between genetic and sporadic prion diseases. Although the rarity of prion diseases limits the establishment of a definitive hypometabolism pattern, this review reveals some more prevalent 18F-FDG patterns associated with each disease subtype. Interestingly, in both sporadic and genetic prion diseases, the hippocampus does not show significant glucose metabolism alterations, appearing as a useful sign in the differential diagnosis with other neurodegenerative disease. In genetic prion disease forms, PET abnormality precedes clinical manifestation. Discordant diagnostic value for amyloid tracers among different prion disease subtypes was observed, needing further investigation. PET has emerged as a potential valuable tool in the diagnostic armamentarium for CJD. Its ability to visualize functional and metabolic brain changes provides complementary information to structural MRI, aiding in the early detection and confirmation of CJD

    Cavernous Hemangioma: A Potential Pitfall at Delayed 18F-FDG PET/CT Scan

    No full text
    : We report the case of a 72-year-old woman who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, right quadrantectomy (invasive ductal carcinoma, G3, pT2pN1pMx), and adjuvant radiotherapy. Two years later, a follow-up CT revealed a hepatic nodule of approximately 1 cm suspected for metastasis. 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed for restaging. Standard total-body 18F-FDG PET/CT acquisition showed no abnormal 18F-FDG uptake in the hepatic nodule. A delayed 18F-FDG PET/CT acquisition of upper abdomen was performed at 180 minutes postradiopharmaceutical injection and showed increased 18F-FDG uptake in the hepatic nodule. After nodule resection, the histological examination proved a cavernous hemangioma

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore