1,721,089 research outputs found
Ibuprofen pharmacology and its implications for musculoskeletal disorders
The goals of pain management in orthopedics are to
provide pain relief and to facilitate rehabilitation and a
return to normal function. Given the many, heterogeneous
diseases in this field, we have preferred, in this
review, to distinguish between acute and chronic conditions,
briefly describing each disease and the relative literature
on the applications of ibuprofen.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, particularly
ibuprofen, are commonly used in clinical practice, and
since the 1970s, authors have been trying to clarify their
role, i.e. the precise indications, dosages, and levels of
efficacy, in each of the most common musculoskeletal
diseases. Unfortunately, this issue remains controversial
for many reasons. Indeed, the quality of some manuscripts,
the small number of patients included in some
studies, genetic differences between populations, failure
to clarify the precise physiopathology of many inflammatory/
degenerative musculoskeletal diseases, commercial
interests of companies, and the high cost of randomised
studies have all contributed to the confusio
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Airway Hyperresponsiveness: Mechanisms and Mediators Involved GERD and Asthma
Prilocaine/lidocaine spray for the treatment of premature ejaculation: a dose- and time-finding study for clinical practice use
A eutectic mixture of prilocaine/lidocaine spray (FortacinTM, Recordati, Milan, Italy) has been approved for the management of patients affected by life-long premature ejaculation (PE), but to date, there is a lack of dose- or time-finding studies in the literature that indicate the best method of intake to optimize treatment outcomes. In this multicentre, randomized, two-phase study, we aimed to compare, in terms of treatment effectiveness (primary objective) and safety (secondary objective), different treatment regimens (various doses and times of drug delivery) of FortacinTM in 91 patients affected with lifelong PE who were recruited at four different centres and randomized (1:1:1 ratio) into three different groups. The study included two phases: during the first phase (focused on time-finding), the same drug dose (three sprays) was taken at different intervals before intercourse (5, 15, 30 min). In the second phase (focused on dose finding), different drug doses (1, 3, 5 sprays) were taken at the same interval before intercourse (5 min). The main outcome measure instruments were self-measured intravaginal ejaculation latency time (sm-IELT), the premature ejaculation diagnostic tool (PEDT), and the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5). Furthermore, patients were asked to report any side effects that appeared during the study period. Our main study findings showed that the treatment regimen with three sprays of FortacinTM administered 5 min before sexual intercourse showed the best results in terms of ejaculation time and control (Phase I, IELT 221 ± 3.4, PEDT 7.7 ± 0.3; Phase II, IELT 213 ± 4.9, PEDT 7.8 ± 0.4) with a safety profile that was identical to other treatment regimens. Based on these data, patients who are prescribed FortacinTM should stick to this regimen to optimize treatment results
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
