1,806,794 research outputs found
G. D. May
"G. D. May 2/1 Topographical Survey Larrakeyah 7.8.41 to 13.4.43 [signature] Geoff May.
G. D. Mitton
"VX 26311 Bdr G.D. Mitton 61st Battery 2/11 Field Regiment 13.6.44 - 22.9.45."VX 26311 Bombardier G. D. Mitton. 61st Battery 2/11 Field Regiment 13.6.44 - 22.9.45
Personal Papers (MS 80-0002)
Letter from Daniel W. Kempner to G. D. Ulrich asking him to keep an eye out for a good candidate to run the farm at the Kempner plantation in Plantersville as the current manager is stepping down
Carta de G. d´Aguanno a Pedro Dorado Montero
Carta de D. G. d´Aguanno, jurista italiano, a D. Pedro Dorado Montero, sobre el envío de un memorandum para la edición castellana de un libro
Tarjeta Postal de G. d´Aguanno a Pedro Dorado Montero
Tarjeta Postal de D. G. d´Aguanno, jurista italiano, a D. Pedro Dorado Montero, sobre la aparición de una nueva revista, solicitando su colaboración
Carta de G. d´Aguanno a Pedro Dorado Montero
Carta de D. G. d´Aguanno, jurista italiano, a D. Pedro Dorado Montero, sobre la traducción de "Génesis y Evolución del Derecho Civil"
Carta de G. d´Aguanno a Pedro Dorado Montero
Carta de D. G. d´Aguanno, jurista italiano, a D. Pedro Dorado Montero, enviando la 2ª parte de un trabajo y anunciando otros dos para su posible publicación en España
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
