8 research outputs found
The value of preoperative molecular testing in the management of Bethesda V and Bethesda VI thyroid tumors
No full textThe incidence of thyroid cancer has increased over recent years due to the fact that several diagnostic tools, such as neck ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration, are being ever more widely adopted. Lately, another modality which might provide significant information preoperatively on the aggressiveness of a thyroid tumor, its prognosis, and its recurrence rate is molecular testing. We reviewed the literature with regard to the role of preoperative molecular testing in patients with Bethesda V and Bethesda VI thyroid nodules and its impact on choice of the optimal treatment strategy. Several molecular mutations and alterations are associated with thyroid cancer and its biological behavior, such as BRAF-V600E, RET, and TERT promoter. Although the value of preoperative molecular testing for indeterminate nodules (Bethesda III and Bethesda IV) have been analyzed in numerous studies, the impact of preoperative molecular testing on Bethesda V and Bethesda VI thyroid nodules is not adequately described in the current literature. The preoperative recognition of specific molecular mutations, such as BRAFV600E and TERT promoter mutation, might provide more individualized management for thyroid cancer patients by altering the surgical approach and the extent of surgery for patients diagnosed with a more aggressive or iodine-resistant subtype of thyroid cancer. Thyroid cancer is characterized by multiple genetic mutations and alterations and, as a result, preoperative molecular testing of malignant nodules could be a very useful tool for surgeons, enabling them to decide on the most appropriate surgical approach for each patient. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Hellenic Endocrine Society 2024
Intestinal erosions following inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review
No full textPurpose: To sum all available evidence regarding mesh or mesh fixation material intestinal erosion following inguinal hernia repair and identify the parameters that lead to early (< 6 months) versus late (> 6 months) symptom presentation. Methods: A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar databases was undertaken to identify relevant studies published up to June 2020. Results: A total of 54 case reports or cases series, incorporating 57 intestinal erosions were identified. Overall, 13 patients (23%) experienced early intestinal erosions occurring during the first 6 postoperative months while the remaining 44 events (67%) occurred after 6 months. Patients presented most commonly with symptoms of acute obstruction (n = 18, 31.5%), followed by signs of a palpable inguinal mass in 15 patients (26.3%). The late presentation group exhibited significantly more cases of mesh erosion when compared to the early presentation group (100% versus 46.2%, respectively, p < 0.001). Conversely, early presenting cases were more often associated with mesh fixation material erosion (53.8% versus 6.8% in the late group, p < 0.001) and were more likely to develop symptoms of acute intestinal obstruction (61.5% versus 22.8%, p = 0.01). An open primary procedure was more common in late presenting cases (65.9% versus 7.7%, p < 0.001) while early presentation was linked to minimally invasive primary procedures (92.3% versus 34.2%, p < 0.001). Bowel resection was more frequently required in late presenting cases (84.1% versus 46.2%, p = 0.009). Conclusions: Intestinal erosion from prosthetic material is a rare complication of hernia repair leading to considerable morbidity. Prompt operative repair is key in avoiding catastrophic consequences. © 2020, Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature
Safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery. An international, prospective cohort study
No full textIntraperitoneal drains are often placed during emergency colorectal surgery. However, there is a lack of evidence supporting their use. This study aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery. Method: COMPlicAted intra-abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery (COMPASS) is a prospective, international, cohort study into which consecutive adult patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery were enrolled (from 3 February 2020 to 8 March 2020). The primary outcome was the rate of intraperitoneal drain placement. Secondary outcomes included rate and time-to-diagnosis of postoperative intraperitoneal collections, rate of surgical site infections (SSIs), time to discharge and 30-day major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo III-V). Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to estimate the independent association of the outcomes with drain placement. Results: Some 725 patients (median age 68.0 years; 349 [48.1%] women) from 22 countries were included. The drain insertion rate was 53.7% (389 patients). Following multivariable adjustment, drains were not significantly associated with reduced rates (odds ratio [OR] = 1.56, 95% CI: 0.48-5.02, p = 0.457) or earlier detection (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.61-1.90, p = 0.805) of collections. Drains were not significantly associated with worse major postoperative complications (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.67-2.36, p = 0.478), delayed hospital discharge (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.91-1.36, p = 0.303) or increased risk of SSIs (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 0.87-2.99, p = 0.128). Conclusion: This is the first study investigating placement of intraperitoneal drains following emergency colorectal surgery. The safety and clinical benefit of drains remain uncertain. Equipoise exists for randomized trials to define the safety and efficacy of drains in emergency colorectal surgery
Safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery: An international, prospective cohort study
No full textAim: Intraperitoneal drains are often placed during emergency colorectal surgery. However, there is a lack of evidence supporting their use. This study aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery. Method: COMPlicAted intra-abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery (COMPASS) is a prospective, international, cohort study into which consecutive adult patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery were enrolled (from 3 February 2020 to 8 March 2020). The primary outcome was the rate of intraperitoneal drain placement. Secondary outcomes included rate and time-to-diagnosis of postoperative intraperitoneal collections, rate of surgical site infections (SSIs), time to discharge and 30-day major postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo III–V). Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to estimate the independent association of the outcomes with drain placement. Results: Some 725 patients (median age 68.0 years; 349 [48.1%] women) from 22 countries were included. The drain insertion rate was 53.7% (389 patients). Following multivariable adjustment, drains were not significantly associated with reduced rates (odds ratio [OR] = 1.56, 95% CI: 0.48–5.02, p = 0.457) or earlier detection (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.61–1.90, p = 0.805) of collections. Drains were not significantly associated with worse major postoperative complications (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.67–2.36, p = 0.478), delayed hospital discharge (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.91–1.36, p = 0.303) or increased risk of SSIs (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 0.87–2.99, p = 0.128). Conclusion: This is the first study investigating placement of intraperitoneal drains following emergency colorectal surgery. The safety and clinical benefit of drains remain uncertain. Equipoise exists for randomized trials to define the safety and efficacy of drains in emergency colorectal surgery
Intraperitoneal drain placement and outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: international matched, prospective, cohort study
No full textBACKGROUND: Many surgeons routinely place intraperitoneal drains after elective colorectal surgery. However, enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines recommend against their routine use owing to a lack of clear clinical benefit. This study aimed to describe international variation in intraperitoneal drain placement and the safety of this practice. METHODS: COMPASS (COMPlicAted intra-abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery) was a prospective, international, cohort study which enrolled consecutive adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery (February to March 2020). The primary outcome was the rate of intraperitoneal drain placement. Secondary outcomes included: rate and time to diagnosis of postoperative intraperitoneal collections; rate of surgical site infections (SSIs); time to discharge; and 30-day major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade at least III). After propensity score matching, multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to estimate the independent association of the secondary outcomes with drain placement. RESULTS: Overall, 1805 patients from 22 countries were included (798 women, 44.2 per cent; median age 67.0 years). The drain insertion rate was 51.9 per cent (937 patients). After matching, drains were not associated with reduced rates (odds ratio (OR) 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. 0.79 to 2.23; P = 0.287) or earlier detection (hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 0.33 to 2.31; P = 0.780) of collections. Although not associated with worse major postoperative complications (OR 1.09, 0.68 to 1.75; P = 0.709), drains were associated with delayed hospital discharge (HR 0.58, 0.52 to 0.66; P < 0.001) and an increased risk of SSIs (OR 2.47, 1.50 to 4.05; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal drain placement after elective colorectal surgery is not associated with earlier detection of postoperative collections, but prolongs hospital stay and increases SSI risk
Safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery: An international, prospective cohort study
No full textIntraperitoneal drain placement and outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: International matched, prospective, cohort study
No full textIntraperitoneal drain placement and outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: international matched, prospective, cohort study
No full textMany surgeons routinely place intraperitoneal drains after elective colorectal surgery. However, enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines recommend against their routine use owing to a lack of clear clinical benefit. This study aimed to describe international variation in intraperitoneal drain placement and the safety of this practice
