1,720,967 research outputs found

    Regional Assessment of Sub-Hourly Annual Rainfall Maxima

    No full text
    The assessment of rainfall extremes at sub-hourly scales is generally hindered by a lack of rainfall data at small timescale resolutions. This study proposes a methodology for assessing mean annual maximum rainfall at the sub-hourly scale by blending historical time series of annual maxima recorded by mechanical stations (operating at hourly scales) up to the end of the past century with newer time series of annual maxima at higher time resolutions recorded by automatic stations installed over the past twenty years. A linear correlation was found at the regional scale between the shape parameter controlling the dependency of rainfall maxima with a duration longer than one hour and the shape parameter of the dependency of rainfall maxima with the durations shorter than one hour. Thanks to this correlation, data recorded at the mechanical stations could be exploited to assess sub-hourly mean annual maxima. The proposed hybrid procedure was verified and was found to provide estimates with an accuracy close to those obtained with the high-resolution data, i.e., our best estimates. Moreover, the proposed procedure outperforms what could be achieved by spatially interpolating the best estimates at those locations where only hourly data are available

    The characterization of extraordinary extreme events (EEEs) for the assessment of design rainfall depths with high return periods

    Full text link
    The occurrence of rainfall Extraordinary Extreme Events (EEEs) in Mediterranean areas causes serious concerns to the engineers involved in the design of flood and landslide risk mitigation plans as well as of strategic hydraulic engineering structures, such as dams. These extraordinary maxima are characterized by very low frequencies and spatial extent scales that are smaller than those of ordinary maxima, and are usually identified as outliers by classical regional frequency analysis. Extreme Value mixture models, such as the Two-Component Extreme Value distribution, have been introduced in regional frequency analysis in order to overcome this problem. Nevertheless, the rainfall maxima series available for carrying out these regional analyses present coarse spatial spacing and small temporal extent, when compared with EEEs spatial structures and frequencies. Thus, regional statistical analyses with mixture models tend to overestimate EEEs return periods as well. This study presents a new operational statistical approach to properly retrieve the EEEs frequency from the available database and thus to avoid dramatic underestimations of the rainfall depth at very high return periods. The proposed approach implies the analysis of the EEEs at a given support scale in order to assess (a) the percentage of EEEs among the annual maxima and (b) the conditional distribution of the annual maxima given the occurrence of an EEE. The descriptive properties of the proposed procedure have been tested in Italy, by comparing the performances of the proposed procedure in predicting rainfall depths at very high return periods (i.e., larger than 100 years) with those provided by the TCEV-based regional analysis currently adopted as national reference approach

    Imperfect scaling of time and space-time rainfall

    No full text
    Scale invariance is the most fertile concept to be introduced in stochastic rainfall modeling in 15 years. In particular, a form of scale invariance called multifractality has been exploited to construct parsimonious representations of rainfall in time and space and address fundamental problems of hydrology such as rainfall extremes, downscaling, and forecasting. However, several authors have observed that rainfall is scale invariant only in approximation and within limited ranges. Here, we make a systematic analysis of the deviations of time and space–time rainfall from multifractality. We use a flexible multiplicative cascade model, which produces multifractality as a special case while allowing deviations from scale invariance to occur. By fitting the model to rainfall records from different climates and over land or ocean, we find significant and consistent departures from multifractality in both the alternation of wet and dry conditions and the fluctuations of precipitation intensity when it rains. The fractal dimension of the rain support increases with increasing rain rate and the (multiplicative) fluctuations are larger at smaller scales and for lighter rainfall. A plausible explanation of these departures from scaling is that the rate of water vapor condensation in the atmosphere is a multifractal process in three space dimensions plus time, but multifractality is destroyed when the condensation rate is integrated to produce rainfall intensity at fixed altitudes

    An experimental assessment of extremewave evaluation by integrating model andwave buoy data

    No full text
    Calculating the significant wave height (SWH) in a given location as a function of the return time is an essential tool of coastal and ocean engineering; such a calculation can be carried out by making use of the now widely available weather and wave model chains, which often lead to underestimating the results, or by means of in situ experimental data (mostly, wave buoys), which are only available in a limited number of sites. A procedure is hereby tested whereby the curves of extreme SWH as a function of the return time deriving from model data are integrated with the similar curves computed from buoy data. A considerable improvement in accuracy is gained by making use of this integrated procedure in all locations where buoy data series are not available or are not long enough for a correct estimation. A useful and general design tool has therefore been provided to derive the extreme value SWH for any point in a given area

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Are rainfall extremes increasing in southern Italy?

    Full text link
    The growing number of extreme hydrological events observed worldwide has raised the level of attention towards the impact of climate change on the rainfall process, which is difficult to quantify given its strong spatial and temporal heterogeneity. Therefore, the impact of the climate change should be determined ranging from individual hydrological series to a regional and/or district scale. With this context, the present study aims to identify trends and dynamics in extreme sub-daily rainfall patterns in southern Italy from 1970 to 2020. A comprehensive database of annual maxima was constructed using all available rainfall data and further expanded through the implementation of the gap-filling procedure, specifically the spatially-constrained ordinary kriging method. This expanded dataset was utilized to explore regional and local trends in annual maxima, offering valuable insights into the evolving nature of rainfall patterns in recent years. While most of the observed trends did not reach statistical significance, a significant number of locations exhibited upward tendencies for shorter durations. It is noteworthy that these trends tended to disappear over longer durations

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore