24 research outputs found

    Analysis Audit

    No full text

    cinema data

    No full text

    Analysis Audit

    No full text

    Symmetry and Stimulus Class Formation in Humans: Control by Temporal Location in a Successive Matching Task

    No full text
    This project contains the data and analysis script of the research reported in Beurms, S., Traets, F., De Houwer, J., & Beckers, T. (in press). Symmetry and stimulus class formation in humans: Control by temporal location in a successive matching task. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Below is the paper's abstract: Symmetry refers to the observation that subjects will derive B-A (e.g., in the presence of B, select A) after being trained on A-B (e.g., in the presence of A, select B). Whereas symmetry is readily shown in humans, it has been difficult to demonstrate in nonhuman animals. This difficulty, at least in pigeons, may result from responding to specific stimulus properties that change when sample and comparison stimuli switch roles between training and testing. In three experiments with humans, we investigated to what extent human responding is influenced by the temporal location of stimuli using a successive matching-to-sample procedure. Our results indicate that temporal location does not spontaneously control responding in humans, although it does in pigeons. Therefore, the number of functional stimuli that humans respond to in this procedure may be half of the number of functional stimuli that the pigeons respond to. In a fourth experiment, we tested this assumption by doubling the number of functional stimuli controlling responding in human participants in an attempt to make the test more comparable to symmetry tests with pigeons. Here, we found that humans responded according to indirect class formation in the same manner as pigeons do. In sum, our results indicate that functional symmetry is readily observed in humans, even in cases where the temporal features of the stimuli prevent functional symmetry in pigeons. We argue that this difference in behavior between the two species does not necessarily reflect a difference in capacity to show functional symmetry between both species, but could also reflect a difference in the functional stimuli each species responds to

    simulation

    No full text

    Disentangling consideration and choice in case of subset-conjunctive screening

    No full text
    The choice data contains responses of students on a discrete choice experiment concerning student houses

    Analysis Audit

    No full text
    corecore