1,721,044 research outputs found

    Reduction of regional cerebral blood flow by melatonin in young rats

    No full text
    MELATONIN (10 ng) was subcutaneously administered to 14-day-old Sprague-Dawley rats. Regional blood flow (rCBF) was measured in 22 anatomically defined structures 20 min later using iodo[C-14]antipyrine and quantitative autoradiography. rCBF was markedly reduced in the cerebral areas supplied by circle of Willis and the basilar arteries. Melatonin also significantly decreased blood flow to choroid plexuses. These findings suggest that circulating melatonin may contribute to regulation of cerebral blood flow and brain fluid balance

    A carnivore species (Canis familiaris) expresses circadian melatonin rhythm in the peripheral blood and melatonin receptors in the brain

    No full text
    Dogs kept under controlled photoperiodic conditions of 12 h light and 12 h dark expressed a clear diurnal melatonin rhythm in the peripheral blood, with a swift peak restricted to the late part of the scotophase. The highest density of high-affinity, G-protein-linked 2-[I-125]iodomelatonin binding sites was found in the pars tuberalis of the pituitary gland. Binding sites were found also in the pars distalis, and light microscopy/high-resolution autoradiography showed that binding was located exclusively over the chromophobe and basophilic cells forming the adenopituitary zona tuberalis, well developed in this species, and extending into the gland as a continuation of pars tuberalis. Cords of basophilic cells located in the pars distalis proper also expressed high receptor density. The eosinophils in the adenohypophysis and the neural lobe were devoid of binding. Heavily labeled were the external laminar and the mitral cell layers of the olfactory bulbs, but no binding was detected in the filae nervi olfactorii or tractus olfactorius. The hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nuclei were discernible clearly. Quantitative autoradiography inhibition experiments revealed that the apparent melatonin inhibitory constant (IC50) in all those areas was around 0.1 nmol/l, which is a physiologically appropriate value considering the peripheral blood melatonin levels. Co-incubation with guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTP(r)S) led to a consequential decrease in the binding density. The specific binding observed in other areas (hippocampus, frontal, parietal, occipital cortex and cerebellum) was rather weak, diffuse and could not be attributed to a particular layer; the apparent IC50 for melatonin was about 1 mu mol/l, and co-incubation with GTP(r)S did not modify the binding density. Collectively, these data show that the dog posesses all the prerequisites for an efficient network adapted to photoperiodic time measurements. A circadian melatonin signal in the peripheral blood and an apparently functional readout receptor system located in key positions within the brain are both present in this species

    2-Substituted-5-Methoxy-N-acyltryptamines: Synthesis and Binding Affinity to the Melatonin Receptor

    No full text
    Joint Meeting Society for Drug Research Società Chimica Italiana (Divisione di Chimica Farmaceutica), P29, 57 (Poster) editor

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore