1,721,181 research outputs found

    Supplemental Material, sj-docx-1-spp-10.1177_19485506211034277 - Implicit Ambivalence: A Driving Force to Improve Relationship Problems

    No full text
    Supplemental Material, sj-docx-1-spp-10.1177_19485506211034277 for Implicit Ambivalence: A Driving Force to Improve Relationship Problems by Ruddy Faure, James K. McNulty, Andrea L. Meltzer and Francesca Righetti in Social Psychological and Personality Science</p

    FaureSupplementalMaterial – Supplemental material for Speech Is Silver, Nonverbal Behavior Is Gold: How Implicit Partner Evaluations Affect Dyadic Interactions in Close Relationships

    No full text
    Supplemental material, FaureSupplementalMaterial for Speech Is Silver, Nonverbal Behavior Is Gold: How Implicit Partner Evaluations Affect Dyadic Interactions in Close Relationships by Ruddy Faure, Francesca Righetti, Magdalena Seibel and Wilhelm Hofmann in Psychological Science</p

    FaureOpenPracticesDisclosure – Supplemental material for Speech Is Silver, Nonverbal Behavior Is Gold: How Implicit Partner Evaluations Affect Dyadic Interactions in Close Relationships

    No full text
    Supplemental material, FaureOpenPracticesDisclosure for Speech Is Silver, Nonverbal Behavior Is Gold: How Implicit Partner Evaluations Affect Dyadic Interactions in Close Relationships by Ruddy Faure, Francesca Righetti, Magdalena Seibel and Wilhelm Hofmann in Psychological Science</p

    Supplemental_Materials_1_Assessments_in_Studies_1_and_2_Visserman_et_al - Taking Stock of Reality: Biased Perceptions of the Costs of Romantic Partners’ Sacrifices

    No full text
    Supplemental_Materials_1_Assessments_in_Studies_1_and_2_Visserman_et_al for Taking Stock of Reality: Biased Perceptions of the Costs of Romantic Partners’ Sacrifices by Mariko L. Visserman, Francesca Righetti, Amy Muise, Emily A. Impett, Samantha Joel and Paul A. M. Van Lange in Social Psychological and Personality Science</p

    Supplemental Material, SPPS757599_suppl_mat - To “See” Is to Feel Grateful? A Quasi-Signal Detection Analysis of Romantic Partners’ Sacrifices

    No full text
    Supplemental Material, SPPS757599_suppl_mat for To “See” Is to Feel Grateful? A Quasi-Signal Detection Analysis of Romantic Partners’ Sacrifices by Mariko L. Visserman, Emily A. Impett, Francesca Righetti, Amy Muise, Dacher Keltner, and Paul A. M. Van Lange in Social Psychological and Personality Science</p

    Supplemental_Materials_2_Additional_Experimental_Study_Visserman_et_al - Taking Stock of Reality: Biased Perceptions of the Costs of Romantic Partners’ Sacrifices

    No full text
    Supplemental_Materials_2_Additional_Experimental_Study_Visserman_et_al for Taking Stock of Reality: Biased Perceptions of the Costs of Romantic Partners’ Sacrifices by Mariko L. Visserman, Francesca Righetti, Amy Muise, Emily A. Impett, Samantha Joel and Paul A. M. Van Lange in Social Psychological and Personality Science</p

    Supplemental material - Relationship difficulties and “technoference” during the COVID-19 pandemic

    No full text
    Supplemental Material for Relationship difficulties and “technoference” during the COVID-19 pandemic by Giulia Zoppolat, Francesca Righetti, Rhonda Balzarini, María Alonso-Ferres, Betul Urganci, David L. Rodrigues, Anik Debrot, Juthatip Wiwattanapantuwong, Christoffer Dharma, Peilian Chi, Johan Karremans, Dominik Schoebi1, and Richard B. Slatcher in Journal of Social and Personal Relationships</p

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore