1,721,008 research outputs found
Francesca Raimondi, Die Zeit der Demokratie. Politische Freiheit nach Carl Schmitt und Hannah Arendt, 2014
Francesca Raimondi, Die Zeit der Demokratie. Politische Freiheit nach Carl Schmitt und Hannah Arendt, Konstanz: Konstanz University Press, 2014, 222 Seiten, € 27,90
Die Geschichtlichkeit der Gegenwartskunst:Wahrheit und Aktualität der Niederländischen Malerei
In der Moderne muss Kunst ebenso wahr wie gegenwärtig sein. Kein Werk und keine Praxis können sich glaubhaft als Kunst behaupten, ohne diesem Anspruch zu genügen. Doch wie konnten Wahrheit und Gegenwärtigkeit zu den entscheidenden, nicht-ästhetischen Kriterien von Kunst werden? In seinem jüngst erschienenen Buch Die Wahrheit der Niederländischen Malerei – Eine Archäologie der Gegenwartskunst (2021) verfolgt Helmut Draxler eine Tradition des Wahrheits- und des Gegenwartsbezugs von Kunst zurück in die Niederlande des 15. bis 17. Jahrhunderts, als die Malerei im Spannungsfeld zwischen ökonomischen, politischen und religiösen Krisen begann, um ihren Status als Kunst zu ringen. Über die darin formulierten Thesen und Fragen diskutieren Helmut Draxler, Regine Prange und Francesca Raimondi. Regine Prange hat den Lehrstuhl für Neuere und Neueste Kunstgeschichte, Kunst- und Medientheorie an der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt a.M. inne. Sie ist Autorin des Buches Das ikonoklastische Bild. Piet Mondrian und die Selbstkritik der Malerei und arbeitet derzeit an einem Buchprojekt zum ‘Realismus als Formproblem‘. Helmut Draxler ist Professor für Kunsttheorie an der Universität für Angewandte Kunst in Wien. Seine Buchpublikationen umfassen Die Wahrheit der Niederländischen Malerei. Eine Archäologie der Gegenwartskunst, Paderborn (Brill-Fink) 2021; Abdrift des Wollens. Eine Theorie der Vermittlung (2017); Gefährliche Substanzen. Zum Verhältnis von Kritik und Kunst (2007). Francesca Raimondi ist Juniorprofessorin für Philosophie an der Kunstakademie Düsseldorf. Sie forscht an der Schnittstelle zwischen Ästhetik, politischer Theorie und kritischer Gesellschaftsanalyse u.a. mit einem Schwerpunkt auf Verkörperungsweisen. Zuletzt hat sie gemeinsam mit Martina Dobbe den Sammelband Serialität und Wiederholung: revisited herausgegeben; im Erscheinen ist ihr Essay ‘Freedom of Breath‘
Khurana/Quadflieg/Raimondi/Rebentisch/Setton (Hg.): Negativität
Rezension von Thomas Khurana/Dirk Quadflieg/Francesca Raimondi/Juliane Rebentisch/Dirk Setton (Hg.): Negativität. Kunst, Recht, Politik. Berlin: Suhrkamp 2018
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
A Revision without Reserve:Agamben’s Homo Sacer
Over the course of two decades, from 1995 to 2015, Giorgio Agamben published a series of nine books, not in sequence but conceived from the beginning as parts of a project sharing the title of its first volume, Homo sacer. These nine books have now been collected into a single volume edition in French (2016), English (2017), and Italian (2018), rendering visible the extent to which the project as a whole amounts to a radical revision of Western philosophy yet also enacted a painstaking self-revision in its course. With the entire trajectory of Homo sacer now evident in its completed arch and rearranged order, the symposium sets out to explore crucial concepts and issues at stake in the project and the new contours they reveal within the larger framework, while also interrogating the hidden spots in the work, unresolved points from which new researches will depart, as Agamben himself has incessantly done with his ever-growing meshwork of references and interlocutors. As he vowed in 1995, at the very outset of his endeavor: ‘… many of these notions demanded — in the urgency of catastrophe — to be revised without reserve.’ The day-long symposium includes a morning workshop with Luca Di Blasi and others on the last text Agamben added to the single-volume edition, well after the individual publication of its last book Stasis — a fourteen-page ‘Note on War, Play, and the Enemy’, in which Agamben takes a newly measured distance from Carl Schmitt’s understanding of the political as resting on the possibility of violent conflict. For this morning workshop, a registration is required, the text in question will be sent to registered participants. The day itself will consist of two panels with short presentations and time for discussion. The symposium will conclude with an evening event — in German — with Bettine Menke and Francesca Raimondi, a discussion revolving around the relationship between Agamben’s project and its historical context, the urgencies and catastrophes he sought to address, as well as alternative modes of addressing them. 10:30 – 12:00 Discussion on Agamben’s ‘Note on War, Play, and the Enemy’, with Luca Di Blasi and others 12:30 Introduction by Francesco Giusti, Damiano Sacco, Facundo Vega 12:40-13:30 Panel I Francesco Giusti, Gestische Sprache and the Suspension of Action: Reflections on an Idea of Community Katrin Trüstedt, The Use of Bodies: Pulcinella, Play, and Profanation 15:00-16:30 Panel II Christiane Frey, Stasis and Restraint: On Agamben’s Politics of Time Damiano Sacco, Exceptional Violence Arnd Wedemeyer, Political Malediction: Curse, Ban, Sacratio 17:00-18:00 Panel III Tom Vandeputte, Unhappiness and Law: Agamben Reading Simone Weil Filippo Trentin, Agamben’s Queer Theory? 19:30 Discussion with Bettine Menke and Francesca Raimondi (in German)
Nel corso di due decenni, dal 1995 al 2015, Giorgio Agamben ha pubblicato una serie di nove libri, non in sequenza ma concepiti fin dall’inizio come parti di un progetto che prende nome dal titolo del primo volume, Homo Sacer. I nove volumi sono stati ora raccolti in un’edizione integrale in francese (2016), inglese (2017) e italiano (2018) che rende evidente come l’opera, nella sua interezza, costituisca una revisione radicale della filosofia occidentale e sia stata a sua volta oggetto di un’attenta auto-revisione nel corso del tempo. Di fronte all’intera traiettoria di Homo Sacer, che oggi si mostra nel suo arco completo e nel suo nuovo ordinamento, il simposio si propone di esplorare le questioni e i concetti cruciali posti al centro del progetto e i nuovi contorni che questi rivelano all’interno della più ampia cornice, interrogando al contempo i luoghi nascosti nell’opera, punti irrisolti da cui partire per nuove ricerche, come Agamben stesso ha incessantemente fatto con la sua rete crescente di riferimenti e interlocutori. Al principio della sua impresa, nel 1995, riferendosi alle nozioni ritenute chiare o certe dalle scienze umane, aveva infatti promesso: ‘molte di esse esigevano — nell’urgenza della catastrofe — una revisione senza riserve’. La giornata di studi include un workshop al mattino sull’ultimo testo aggiunto da Agamben all’edizione integrale, molto dopo la pubblicazione autonoma del suo ultimo volume Stasis: le quattordici pagine della ‘Nota sulla guerra, il gioco e il nemico’ in cui prende con nuova misura le distanze dalla concezione di Carl Schmitt del politico come basato sulla possibilità del conflitto violento. Dopo due panel in cui brevi interventi saranno seguiti da uno spazio dedicato alla discussione, il simposio si concluderà con un evento serale a cui prenderanno parte Bettine Menke e Francesca Raimondi: una discussione intorno al rapporto tra il progetto di Agamben e il suo contesto storico, alle urgenze e alle catastrofi che ha cercato di affrontare, e ai modi alternativi di affrontarle
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
