10 research outputs found

    Blood-brain barrier dysfunction: the undervalued frontier of hypertension

    No full text
    The blood-brain barrier (BBB) constitutes the complex anatomic and physiologic interface between the intravascular compartment and the central nervous system, and its integrity is paramount for the maintenance of the very sensitive homeostasis of the central nervous system. Arterial hypertension is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. The BBB has been shown to be disrupted in essential hypertension. BBB integrity is important for central autonomic control and this may be implicated in the pathophysiology of hypertension. On the other hand, evidence from experimental studies indicates that BBB disruption can be present in both hypertensive disease and dementia syndromes, suggesting a possibly key position of loss of BBB integrity in the pathophysiological pathways linking arterial hypertension with cognitive decline. Although much still remains to be elucidated with respect to the exact underlying mechanisms, the discovery of novel pathological pathways has changed our understanding of adult dementia and central nervous system disease overall, pointing out-in parallel-new potential therapeutic targets. The aim of this review is to summarize current scientific knowledge relevant to the pathophysiologic pathways that are involved in the disruption of the BBB function and potentially mediate hypertension-induced cognitive impairment. In parallel, we underline the differential cognition-preserving effect of several antihypertensive agents of similar blood pressure-lowering capacity, highlighting the presence of previously under-recognized BBB-protective actions of these drugs

    B-type natriuretic peptide levels and benign adiposity in obese heart failure patients

    No full text
    Obesity is a major risk factor for the development of chronic heart failure (CHF) and does not only pose diagnostic challenges, but also has prognostic implications for these patients. Paradoxically, obese patients with CHF have a better prognosis than thinner individuals. In recent years, it has been demonstrated that the adipose tissue, even in patients with HF, is not always detrimental, and that obesity may coexist with a phenotype of benign adiposity without systemic metabolic abnormalities. Experimental data have shown that natriuretic peptides (NPs), and in particular brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), play a major role in the communication of the heart with the adipose tissue. Body fat distribution and adipose tissue function show a large degree of heterogeneity among depots and may explain the complex relationship between NPs and body fat. NPs can affect both the quality and the behaviour of fatty tissue, promoting a healthy adipocyte phenotype, and can favourably affect body fat metabolism. In this article, we review the existing literature on the bidirectional effects of BNP and adipose tissue in HF and highlight the complexity of this relationship

    Myocardial inotropic reserve: An old twist that constitutes a reliable index in the modern era of heart failure

    No full text
    Current national and international guidelines, including those of the European Society of Cardiology, recognize that the assessment of prognosis should be a part of the standard management for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). However, these same guidelines recognize the inherent difficulty of this process. A variety of factors contribute to this difficulty, including the varying etiology, frequent co-morbidity and, perhaps most importantly, huge inter-individual variability in the disease progression and outcome. Although CHF is chronic, it is also a condition in which significant proportions of patients experience apparently ‘sudden’ death, which almost certainly contributes to our difficulty in assessing individual patient prognosis. A useful tool for the risk stratification of heart failure patients is dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), which determines the myocardial viability in ischemic cardiomyopathy and myocardial contractile reserve in idiopathic cardiomyopathy

    Cytokeratin 18 as a Novel Biomarker in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

    No full text
    Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a heart muscle disease associated with an increased risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD). Cytokeratin 18-based proteins, such as M30 and M65 antigens, are known cell-death biomarkers. M30 antigen is released from cells during apoptosis, and M65 antigen is released during cell death from any cause, such as apoptosis or necrosis. We aimed to study the expression of M30 and M65 antigens in peripheral blood obtained by 46 HCM patients and compare with 27 age- and sex-matched patients without HCM. We also investigated the CK18 expression in myocardium from postmortem HCM hearts. M30 and M65 antigens were significantly increased in the HCM vs. non-HCM group (Μ30: 338 ± 197 U/uL vs. 206 ± 166 U/uL, p = 0.003; M65: 428 ± 224 U/uL vs. 246 ± 214 U/uL, p = 0.001), and HCM patients with a higher expression of these markers (M30: 417 ± 208 vs. 271 ± 162 U/uL, p = 0.011; M65: 518 ± 242 vs. 351 ± 178 U/uL, p = 0.011) had a higher risk for SCD. In HCM, both apoptosis and necrosis are increased, but particularly necrosis (M30/M65 ratio: 0.75 ± 0.09 vs. 0.85 ± 0.02, p < 0.001). CK18 is expressed in the HCM myocardium (1.767 ± 0.412 vs. 0.537 ± 0.383, % of area, p = 0.0058). Therefore, M30 and M65 antigens may be novel biomarkers in HCM

    Cardiac myosin activation with omecamtiv mecarbil in systolic heart failure

    No full text
    BACKGROUND The selective cardiac myosin activator omecamtiv mecarbil has been shown to improve cardiac function in patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. Its effect on cardiovascular outcomes is unknown. METHODS We randomly assigned 8256 patients (inpatients and outpatients) with symptomatic chronic heart failure and an ejection fraction of 35% or less to receive omecamtiv mecarbil (using pharmacokinetic-guided doses of 25 mg, 37.5 mg, or 50 mg twice daily) or placebo, in addition to standard heart-failure therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of a first heart-failure event (hospitalization or urgent visit for heart failure) or death from cardiovascular causes. RESULTS During a median of 21.8 months, a primary-outcome event occurred in 1523 of 4120 patients (37.0%) in the omecamtiv mecarbil group and in 1607 of 4112 patients (39.1%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86 to 0.99; P = 0.03). A total of 808 patients (19.6%) and 798 patients (19.4%), respectively, died from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.11). There was no significant difference between groups in the change from baseline on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score. At week 24, the change from baseline for the median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level was 10% lower in the omecamtiv mecarbil group than in the placebo group; the median cardiac troponin I level was 4 ng per liter higher. The frequency of cardiac ischemic and ventricular arrhythmia events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection, those who received omecamtiv mecarbil had a lower incidence of a composite of a heart-failure event or death from cardiovascular causes than those who received placebo. (Funded by Amgen and others; GALACTIC-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02929329; EudraCT number, 2016 -002299-28.)

    Cardiac myosin activation with omecamtiv mecarbil in systolic heart failure

    No full text
    Background: The selective cardiac myosin activator omecamtiv mecarbil has been shown to improve cardiac function in patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. Its effect on cardiovascular outcomes is unknown. Methods: We randomly assigned 8256 patients (inpatients and outpatients) with symptomatic chronic heart failure and an ejection fraction of 35% or less to receive omecamtiv mecarbil (using pharmacokinetic-guided doses of 25 mg, 37.5 mg, or 50 mg twice daily) or placebo, in addition to standard heart-failure therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of a first heart-failure event (hospitalization or urgent visit for heart failure) or death from cardiovascular causes. Results: During a median of 21.8 months, a primary-outcome event occurred in 1523 of 4120 patients (37.0%) in the omecamtiv mecarbil group and in 1607 of 4112 patients (39.1%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86 to 0.99; P=0.03). A total of 808 patients (19.6%) and 798 patients (19.4%), respectively, died from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.11). There was no significant difference between groups in the change from baseline on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score. At week 24, the change from baseline for the median N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide level was 10% lower in the omecamtiv mecarbil group than in the placebo group; the median cardiac troponin I level was 4 ng per liter higher. The frequency of cardiac ischemic and ventricular arrhythmia events was similar in the two groups. Conclusions: Among patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection, those who received omecamtiv mecarbil had a lower incidence of a composite of a heart-failure event or death from cardiovascular causes than those who received placebo. (Funded by Amgen and others; GALACTIC-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02929329. opens in new tab; EudraCT number, 2016-002299-28. opens in new tab.
    corecore