491 research outputs found
Bronze Prutah of Roman Procurator Antonius Felix (52-59 CE)
Bronze prutah of Antonius Felix, procurator of Judea under Emperor Claudius. Obv: two oblong shields and two spears crossed and surrounded by Greek inscription "Nero Claudius Caesar". Rev: palm tree and inscription "Britanicus, year 14 of Caesar". Minted in Jerusalem
Bronze Prutah of Roman Procurator Antonius Felix (52-59 CE)
Bronze prutah of Antonius Felix, procurator of Judea under Emperor Claudius. Obv: two oblong shields and two spears crossed and surrounded by Greek inscription "Nero Claudius Caesar". Rev: palm tree and inscription "Britanicus, year 14 of Caesar". Minted in Jerusalem
Antonius Diogenes, Die unglaublichen Dinge jenseits von Thule
The Wonders Beyond Thule by Antonius Diogenes uniquely combines a range of themes, including aspects of a love story, fantastic journeys, and Pythagorean philosophy. The author reassembles this work, which has only been preserved through papyrus fragments as well as later authors’ accounts, into a new edition that offers detailed philological and interpretive commentary on all of the surviving descriptions and fragments
Pallas e Felix: resistenza, resilienza e caduta di due liberti imperiali
Marcus Antonius Pallas e (Claudius?) Felix erano due schiavi di Antonia, madre di Claudio; divenuti potentissimi liberti durante il principato di Claudio, l’uno, Pallas, riceverà le insegne pretorie per esser stato l’ispiratore del famoso SC Claudianum nel 52, con il quale si punivano le donne che avessero relazioni stabili con schiavi altrui; l’altro diverrà procuratore di Giudea negli anni della predicazione di Paolo di Tarso; si indaga sulla carriera dei due personaggi e la loro fine
Pallas e Felix: due liberti imperiali
Marcus Antonius Pallas e (Claudius?) Felix erano due schiavi di Antonia, figlia di M. Antonio il triumviro; divenuti potentissimi liberti durante il principato di Claudio, l’uno, Pallas, riceverà le insegne pretorie per esser stato l’ispiratore del famoso SC Claudianum nel 52, con il quale si punivano le donne che avessero relazioni stabili con schiavi altrui; l’altro diverrà procuratore di Giudea negli anni della predicazione di Paolo di Tarso; descrivo la carriera dei due personaggi, la loro personalità e la loro fine
De infallibilitate Romani Pontificis in definiendis fidei et morum controuersiis... tractatus theologicus
Segunda mención de pie de imp. tomada del colofónSign.: *>4447
Bronze Prutah of Roman Procurator Antonius Felix (52-59 CE)
This is a bronze prutah of the Roman procurator of Judaea (52-59 CE) under the roman Emperor Claudius. He judged the Apostle Paul and sent him to prison for 2 years. Obv: two crossed palm branches surrounded by the Greek inscription "Tiberius Claudius Germanicus, year 14". Rev: wreath and within it four lines with inscription "Julia Agrippina." Minted in Jerusalem in 54 CE
Bronze Prutah of Roman Procurator Antonius Felix (52-59 CE)
This is a bronze prutah of the Roman procurator of Judaea (52-59 CE) under the roman Emperor Claudius. He judged the Apostle Paul and sent him to prison for 2 years. Obv: two crossed palm branches surrounded by the Greek inscription "Tiberius Claudius Germanicus, year 14". Rev: wreath and within it four lines with inscription "Julia Agrippina." Minted in Jerusalem in 54 CE
Links Between Antonius Diogenes and Petronius
In this paper I look at the different possible relationships between these two texts: that Antonius Diogenes may be aware of and use the Satyrica of Petronius, that Petronius may use Antonius Diogenes, and that the two texts may be separately influenced by a common Milesian-style source. These hypotheses and their consequences are weighed and examined: all remain possibilities and may be consistent with chronology and relationships to other texts.Ewen Bowie is E.P.Warren Praelector in Classics at Corpus Christi College, Oxford, and Professor of Classical Languages and Literature in the University of Oxford. He is the author of many papers on the ancient novel and associated topics, and is working on a commentary on Daphnis and Chloe
Antonius Andreae and Classical Culture
Tomás y Joaquín Carreras afirmaron (1943) que o bien el Scriptum super Metaphysicam Aristotelis
no era una obra genuina de Antonius Andreae († ca. 1333) o bien había sido objeto de interpolaciones
porque su autor manifiesta unos conocimientos de cultura clásica y una mentalidad propios del s. XV.
Actualmente los especialistas consideran que esta obra es auténtica de Andreae, pero ¿pudo ser objeto de interpolaciones? Solo un examen detallado de la tradición manuscrita e impresa permitirá en el futuro
responder definitivamente a esta pregunta. De momento este artículo analiza los conocimientos de cultura clásica manifestados en dicha obra y concluye que son compatibles con un autor de inicios del s. XIV.Tomàs and Joaquim Carreras stated (1943) that either the Scriptum super Metaphysicam Aristotelis
was not genuinely by Antonius Andreae († ca. 1333), or it was subjected to interpolations because its
author demonstrates knowledge of classical culture and a mentality characteristic of the fifteenth century.
Experts currently consider this work to be genuinely by Andreae; but could it also have been subjected
to interpolations? Only a detailed examination of the manuscript and printed tradition will, in the future,
allow this question to be answered definitively. For the moment, this article analyses the knowledge of
classical culture demonstrated in this work, and concludes that it is compatible with the knowledge available to an author from the beginning of the fourteenth century
- …
