699 research outputs found
Uma cena de Fausto
No full textO assunto fáustico atravessa a obra de Púchkin. Ainda que o autor não tenha tido contato com a segunda parte da tragédia de Goethe, é possível enxergar inúmeros paralelismos do “fomentador” Fausto, nas palavras de Marshall Berman, em O Cavaleiro de Bronze. Em “Uma cena de Fausto”, Púchkin recorre a alguns motivos da história do homem que vendeu a alma ao diabo, os principais são: o esquecimento e o tédio do homem sem limites. Este que é ampliado na composição de Púchkin, para representar, como é típico do autor, temas estrangeiros tendo em vista necessidades históricas do seu país. Na presente tradução, optou-se por uma versão prosaica da “Cena de Fausto”.The faustian subject runs through Pushkin\u27s work. Even though the author has not had contact with the second part of Goethe\u27s tragedy, it is possible to see countless parallels of “The Developer” Faust, in the words of Marshall Berman, in The Bronze Horseman. In “A scene from Faust”, Pushkin resorts to some motifs from the story of the man who sold his soul to the devil, the main ones being: forgetfulness and the boredom of the man without limits. This one is expanded in Pushkin\u27s composition, to represent, as is typical of the author, foreign themes in view of the historical needs of his country. In the present translation, a prosaic version of the “Scene from Faust” was chosen
Portrait of Daniel Yturria, son Herminio, and Daniel Fausto
No full textBlack and white photograph. Portrait of Daniel Yturria\u27s sons shortly after their mother’s death in 1902. Left to right: Herminio (Herman) Yturria, Daniel Yturria Jr., and Fausto Yturria Sr. (father of the author)https://scholarworks.utrgv.edu/yturriaphoto/1008/thumbnail.jp
Human-Agent versus Human Pull Requests: A Testing-Focused Characterization and Comparison
No full textAI-based coding agents are increasingly integrated into software development workflows, collaborating with developers to create pull requests (PRs). Despite their growing adoption, the role of human-agent collaboration in software testing remains poorly understood. This paper presents an empirical study of 6,582 human-agent PRs (HAPRs) and 3,122 human PRs (HPRs) from the AIDev dataset. We compare HAPRs and HPRs along three dimensions: (i) testing frequency and extent, (ii) types of testing-related changes (code-and-test co-evolution vs. test-focused), and (iii) testing quality, measured by test smells. Our findings reveal that, although the likelihood of including tests is comparable (42.9% for HAPRs vs. 40.0% for HPRs), HAPRs exhibit a larger extent of testing, nearly doubling the test-to-source line ratio found in HPRs. While test-focused task distributions are comparable, HAPRs are more likely to add new tests during co-evolution (OR = 1.79), whereas HPRs prioritize modifying existing tests. Finally, although some test smell categories differ statistically, negligible effect sizes suggest no meaningful differences in quality. These insights provide the first characterization of how human-agent collaboration shapes testing practices
Da Walcott a Soyinka, da Heaney a Burnside. "The Saying of It": conversazioni di Marco fazzini con poeti anglofoni, da ETS
No full textRecensione a volume di interviste ad alcuni dei maggiori poeti anglofoni contemporanei
Recensione a Douglas Livingstone, "Loving" e M. Fazzini (a cura di), "Son to the Ocean: New Essays on Douglas Livingstone’s Poetry"
No full textChiara Cretella, "Effetto Medusa. Iconografie della violenza di genere tra arte e immaginario", Fausto Lupetti, 2013. Conversazione con l’autrice
No full textInterview with Chiara Cretella, author of Effetto Medusa. Iconografie della violenza di genere tra arte e immaginario (The Medusa effect. Iconography of gender violence between art and imagery), Fausto Lupetti, 2013Intervista con Chiara Cretella, autrice del libro Effetto Medusa. Iconografie della violenza di genere tra arte e immaginario, Fausto Lupetti 2013
Fausto Sozzini, la mortalità d’Adamo e la teologia moderna
No full textFausto Sozzini, Adam's Mortality and Early Modern Theology. In his dispute with Francesco Pucci, Fausto Sozzini argues that man was not created immortal but, being by nature subject to death, he could be made perpetually immune only through divine grace, which was a gift not included in his creation. It has thus been suggested that the Pucci-Sozzini querelle should be read as an expression of the broader debate that opposed the two 'souls' of modern theology, that is the Thomistic and the Augustinian. By reconstructing the late medieval theological debate on the mortality of Adam in the condition of innocence, the Author tries to show that Sozzini's theses are greatly indebted to Duns Scotus' criticisms of Thomas Aquinas
Quality Education and "quality papers"
No full textAttending seminars, Conferences, looking at "television lessons" the author saw many times many people (often Professors) that did not know the matter they were talking about. Nevertheless they write papers, suggest books to students, provide lessons, make consultancy. Visiting Companies the author saw many times many Companies lacking Quality of Management, a huge problem against Quality achievement. To overcome this paramount drawback there is a MUST: Quality Education on Quality for Managers (particularly future Managers, now Students in Higher Education). For Higher Education Institutions, this means that professors MUST teach, in a correct and scientific way, Quality ideas on Quality. To be real Managers, Management need to grow-up their knowledge because experience alone, without theory, teaches nothing what to do to make Quality. For Higher Education Institutions, this means that professors MUST learn Quality ideas on Quality Management, in a correct and scientific way. In the paper, as already done several times, we present some new cases (out of the hundreds known to the author) where professors were acting with disquality. Would that be useful
Does "Peer Review" assure Quality of papers and Education?
No full textAttending seminars, Conferences, looking at "television lessons" the author saw many times many people (often Professors) that did not know the matter they were talking about; nevertheless they write papers, suggest books to students, provide lessons, make consultancy. Visiting Companies the author saw many times many Companies lacking Quality of Management, a huge problem against Quality achievement. Many people (often Professors) think that Quality in written documents is assured by the "Peer Review Process" carried out by members of "international scientific community", "distinguished colleagues, whose achievements and academic standing is well above …", and that "Quality of teaching" is assured by their "academic standing well above …". To be real Managers, Management need to grow-up their knowledge because experience alone, without theory, teaches nothing what to do to make Quality. For Higher Education Institutions, this means that professors MUST learn Quality ideas on Quality Management, in a correct and scientific way. In the paper, as already done several times, we present some other cases (out of the hundreds known to the author) where professors (and referees, as well) were acting with disquality. Would that be useful? Only God knows it
- …
