1,720,983 research outputs found
Dialectique marxiste, humanisme, anti-humanisme
No full textFausto Ruy. Dialectique marxiste, humanisme, anti-humanisme. In: L'Homme et la société, N. 75-76, 1985. Synthèse en sciences humaines. pp. 133-147
Althussérisme et anthropologisme
No full textFausto Ruy. Althussérisme et anthropologisme. In: L'Homme et la société, N. 41-42, 1976. Critique et théorie Idéologie et pouvoir. pp. 85-103
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Marx in transition: on the relationship between theory and praxis in The German ideology
No full textA presente tese toma por objeto a relação entre teoria e práxis, tal como foi tratada por Karl Marx em sua fase de transição, em especial no livro A ideologia alemã. Obra em que o autor afirma tanto a prioridade mais definitiva da práxis quanto a quase perfeita impotência da teoria especulativa, rejeitando a filosofia e suas questões para fazer a exigência de uma práxis e uma união imediata entre ela e a teoria, ela torna-se objeto privilegiado para os questionamentos quanto às consequências da afirmação de uma tal prioridade da prática para a filosofia, bem como qual poderia ser o papel de uma teoria que se pretenda em função da práxis. Assim, após algumas considerações iniciais e uma contextualização da obra, a investigação principia por uma análise da noção de práxis desenvolvida nA ideologia alemã, para assim chegar à forma de sua relação com a teoria, como lá desenvolvida; a noção central para esta análise sendo o que aqui se designa por primado da prática. Em seguida, este primado é desdobrado em suas consequências teóricas e para o papel da teoria, resultando dele em muitos aspectos o oposto do que se propunha. Por fim, apresentam-se, a partir do ressurgimento destas questões, duas críticas às concepções dA ideologia alemã, de Cornelius Castoriadis e Theodor Adorno, por meio das quais ilustra-se o caráter de transição deste texto e seus conceitos na obra marxiana, bem como alguns dos acertos e intuições que lhe sobrevivem no autor, e como incitação à reflexão para nós e nosso tempo.The present thesis takes as its subject the relation of theory and praxis, such as presented by Karl Marx during his transitional period, specially in The German ideology. A work in which the author states the most definitive priority of praxis as well as theorys nearperfect impotence, rejecting philosophy and its questions make the demand for an immediate union of theory and praxis, it offers a privileged ground for questions regarding the consequences of affirming said priority of praxis to philosophy, as well as what could possibly be the role for a theory that intends to be at the service of praxis. Thusly, after a few considerations and giving a contextualization of the text, investigation begins by analyzing the notion of praxis developed throughout The German ideology, and in this way arriving at the form of its relation to theory; the main notion for this analysis being what is designated in this paper as the primacy of practice. Afterwards, this primacy itself us unfolded in all its consequences for theory and theorys role, with the results being often the opposite of what was intended. Lastly, two critiques of the German ideologys conceptions, by Cornelius Castoriadis and Theodor Adorno, are presented, by means of which one may illustrate the transitional character of said book and its concepts in the Marxian corpus, as well as how some of its best insights endure both in the authors latter works, and as a call to reflexion for us and our age
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Claude Lefort e a crítica de “A propósito da questão judaica” de Marx: dialética e ideologia
No full textComo o seu título indica, o texto tem como objeto as considerações críticas de Lefort — ver o ensaio “Droits de l’homme et politique”, incluído em L’Invention Démocratique, les limites de la domination totalitaire — contra a crítica dos direitos do homem, desenvolvida por Marx no seu artigo de juventude “A propósito da questão judaica”, publicado em 1843, nos Anais Franco-Alemães (revista que Marx fundara com o publicista Arnold Ruge). Depois de expor as razões de Marx e de Lefort, o presente escrito envereda por vários caminhos. Há primeiro uma tentativa de expor as duas séries de argumentos em forma, que se pretende, rigorosamente dialética. Segue-se uma apresentação mais histórico-estrutural, que introduz considerações sobre os chamados “dois liberalismos” (revolucionário e utilitarista). Explora-se, em seguida, a filosofia subjacente ao artigo de Marx nos Anais…, o que leva de novo um desenvolvimento teórico-dialético, e depois, histórico, sobre a questão do humanismo e do antihumanismo. Depois de analisar algumas objeções, de marxistas e de liberais, endereçadas à crítica lefortiana, o autor tenta uma avaliação crítica das posições de Lefort, o que conduz ao problema geral das relações democracia/ capitalismo, em Lefort, e para além dele.As the title indicates, this text aims at the critical considerations of Lefort — see the essay “Droits de l’homme et politique”, included in L’Invention Démocratique, les limites de la domination totalitaire — against the critique of the rights of man published in 1843, in the Franco-German Annals (journal founded by Marx with the publicist Arnold Ruge). After exposing the keys arguments of Marx and Lefort, the present writing goes through several ways. There is first an attempt to expose both series of arguments in a form strictly dialectical. There follows a more historical-structural version, which introduces considerations on the so-called “two liberalisms” (revolutionary and utilitarian). Then, we explore the philosophy underlying Marx’s article in the Annals… which takes a new theoretical-dialectical development, and then, historical, about the question of humanism and anti-humanism. After analysing some objections from both Marxists and liberals, addressed to Lefortian criticism, the author undertakes a critical evaluation on Lefort positions, which leads to the general problem of democracy and capitalism relationship, not only in Lefort but and beyond
- …
