1,720,969 research outputs found
Recensione di M. FANTUZZI, R. HUNTER, Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004
No full textReview of M. FANTUZZI, R. HUNTER, Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 200
The epigram
No full textOne of the chapters written by M. Fantuzzi in M. Fantuzzi and R. Hunter, Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic poetry.
It has been the first systematic analysis of the interactions between monuments and archaic and classical Greek epigrams on stone, and the fictionalization of this relation in the literary epigram of the Hellenistic age
Theocritus and the Bucolic Genre
No full textOne of the chapters written by M. Fantuzzi in M. Fantuzzi and R. Hunter, "Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic poetry"
Analysis of the the construction of the genre of "literary mime, and of its sub-genre bucolic poetry. Main emphasis on the idea of "Invention of a tradition" on behalf of Theocritus, and the dynamics between pastoral ideal of hesychia and pains of love both in Theocritus and in the post-Theocritean bucolic poet
La struttura degli esametri in Esiodo, Erga 383-828
No full textL'anomala alta prevalenza percentuale di esametri strutturati con incisione pentemimere maschile nella seconda parte degli "Erga" di Esiodo (vv. 383-828) si deve probabilmente a una precisa scelta espressiva: far sentire nella seconda parte del verso epico la cadenza del metro paremiaco, tipico della tradizione gnomico-proverbiale.The anomalous high percentage of hexameters with internal breaks at the masculine caesura in the second half of the Hesiodean "Erga" (vv. 383-828) probably depends on a accurate expressive choise: to make ear the rythm of the paroimiac metre, typical of the gnomic tradition
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
