1,721,497 research outputs found
Master Fang Hui of Yangqi and his Meditation Thoughts
Full text link作为临济宗杨岐派的创始人杨岐方会，在当时丛林之中，无论声望或影响力，他都不及同时代的雪窦重显、黄龙慧南等禅师，但在其身后却兴起了一个强盛的禅宗派别－杨岐派。杨岐派成为临济正宗，一直流传至今，对后世的影响很大。本文认为杨岐派有如此的历史境遇主要在于杨岐方会禅学思想的独特性、禅风的契世性以及其教学方法的灵活性。本文拟通过对杨岐方会禅学背景、禅学思想及其特点三方面的探讨，借以说明杨岐方会对北宋临济宗复兴和兴盛的重大贡献及其在中国禅宗史上的重要地位。本文总共分为三部分，绪论部分扼要地介绍了杨岐方会禅学思想研究状况、研究方法与研究意义；第一部分简要概括了杨岐方会禅学思想产生的禅学背景，重点分析了杨岐派为...Master Fang Hui of Yangqi created the Yangqi school of the Linji sect ,whether reputation or influence,he was inferior to master Chong Xian of Xuedou,master Hui Nan of Huanglong contemporary. the Yangqi school has been the west-known orthodx Linji sect and has been long passed down ,powerful force to afterworld. This thesis considers the Yangqi school has the historic condition because Fang Hui h...学位：哲学硕士院系专业：人文学院哲学系_中国哲学学号：20040500
Research on poetics of Ying Kui Lu Sui by Fang Hui
No full text碩士本書論題為「方回《瀛奎律髓》詩學體系研究」，旨在廓清古今學者對《瀛奎律髓》價值優劣判斷的迷思：清代評論家對這部書呈現兩極化的評價，而這兩極評價乃是文學家對於詩歌本質的認定殊異所致，進而影響他們對於詩歌的評價；而近現代學者對於《瀛奎律髓》的研究長期存在著「流派優劣」的迷思，論者多固守流派優劣的價值思維，偏頗地以這種價值判斷去印證理解原典，並沒有深入理解這些「優劣」論述可能存在著什麼先決條件與標準。本文藉由清代學者的評點意見及近現代研究成果的考察，逼顯出問題意識。而且，本文的研究並不窠臼於流派孰優孰劣的問題，而是以客觀的角度如實地考察文本所內蘊的脈絡意義，建構方回《瀛奎律髓》的詩學體系。
本文設立「詩的本質論與功能論」、「詩的創作論」、「詩的批評論」此一論述框架來進行研究。此三者有密切的關聯，卻又是不同層位的思考。以文學而言，對詩本質的認知常會決定詩的創作實踐與批評。若某一作家認定什麼樣的詩是好詩，那麼，在創作實踐的過程中，必然朝著自己所認知的好詩而努力實踐著，期許自己也能作出好詩。當我們確立詩本質後，才能進一步去理解選者是如何依據這個本質，去規範創作這一層次的種種問題。然而，若是以讀者的立場去閱讀別人的詩，通常也會以自己心中理想的詩當做標準，評判各篇詩作的優與劣。因此，詩本質之認定，實是理解一位文學家詩學觀點的緊要處，由此亦可看出此一框架的緊密性。
文學家皆因自己的「在場性」而對「詩的本質」提出規創性的論述，我們要探求的就是方回《瀛奎律髓》對「詩的本質」究竟做了什麼規創性本質論述？通過史料的分析論證，我們抽繹出方回對詩歌本質的認定是「形神交融」，這個本質的界義又該如何理解？而本質必然對應著功能，在他的心中，詩又具有什麼樣的功能呢？
在創作論部分，首先著眼於在創作過程中的詩人工夫修養。方回認為平素應該具備什麼樣的涵養，才能創作出好詩？再者，創作的過程必然得經過學習，因此，學古的態度、方法也是影響著能否作出好詩的關鍵。此外，我們也將揭明方回提出的「活法」創作法則究竟是什麼意義？並考察他所主張的創作技巧有哪些？是否合乎他自己所提出的創作原則？
批評者往往以自己對詩本質的認定及創作經驗來檢視他人的創作。因此，在批評論部分，本文的工作便是要考察方回如何進行批評？採取什麼批評準則？我們找出「格、意、語」這一組批評原則，並分析論述三者之意涵；再構立出「詮釋」與「評價」兩種「批評目的」，以此考察方回詩學的批評論。
最末，綜合各個層次所獲致的觀點，進而提出最終的解答，重構方回《瀛奎律髓》的詩學體系。The title of the thesis is〝 Research on poetics of Ying Kui Lu Sui by Fang Hui〞.The main purpose is to clarify the myth of evaluation about 〝Ying Kui Lu Sui〞for all ancient and modern scholars had. The description as follows: the essayists of Qing- dynasty have a polarization of the book. The polarization is resulted from the different recognition of poems essayists take, and also affects the evaluation of the poems. And modern scholars have the myth of judging what is the best school on researching the book chronically. The scholars defend the thoughts tenaciously, and show preference for understanding the previous poems without minding the precondition and criterion may be existed in the discussion. The thesis intends to develop the issue through the comments of Qing-dynasty scholars and the modern investigation. Besides, the thesis doesn’t stereotype what is the best school, it will construct the context within the poetics of 〝Ying Kui Lu Sui〞 by Fang Hui objectively and honestly.
The thesis do the research in the structure of Foundationism and Functionalism、Creativitism、Criticism of poems. There are strong connections between the three theories but in vertical thinking. For the literature, what we recognize the foundation of the poem affects the creation and comment of it. If a good poet considers what is a good poem, then he will definitely practice and look forward to create a poem as good as that in his mind. Only after establishing the foundation of the poem, we can realize how chooser standardizes every issue of the creation according to the foundation. However, as a reader, we often evaluate the advantage and inferiority of every poem in a basis of the best poem in our mind. As a result, the recognition of the poem is the key point understanding the poetic view scholars own and let us believe the strong connection of the structure.
Scholars advance creative discuss about〝 the foundation of the poem〞 standing on 〝the times they exist〞. What we are going to find out is what kind of creative discuss about the foundation in the book 〝Ying Kui Lu Sui〞by Fang Hui? We deduce that Fang Hui recognize the foundation of the poem is blended with〝form and spirit〞by analyzing source books. But how do we realize the definition of this foundation? And as we know, the foundation is with corresponding function. We are also trying to find out what kind of function of a poem should has in his mind?
In creativitism, we should emphasis on the efforts and training during the creation process. We are going to find out what abilities a poet ought to have to create a good poem ordinarily. Furthermore, only through learning can achieve creation. So, the attitude and approach from the old research are the key point creating a good poem. Above-mentioned we are going to discuss in this article. Besides, we will reveal what is 〝the flexible rule〞by Fang Hui, and find out the skills he advocates when creating poems, and whether the skills are corresponding to that rule.
The essayists often judge other people’s creations in a basis of their recognition of the foundation of the poem and their creating experience. So, in criticism, we will survey how Fang Hui do the criticize and what rules he adopts. We find out a rule called〝classification, thought, and phraseology〞, and analyze the meaning of them. And then construct the interpretation and evaluation these two purposes to survey the criticism by Fang Hui.
Finally, we will integrate each viewpoint and bring up the ultimate explain, and reconstruct the poetic of 〝Ying Kui Lu Sui〞 by Fang Hui.第一章 緒論 ----------------------------------------1
第一節 問題的導出與解決的構想 ---------------------1
一、清人評點《瀛奎律髓》開展的問題意識---------------2
二、近現代研究成果開展的問題意識 --------------------7
第二節 文獻處理與研究方法--------------------------16
一、文獻處理----------------------------------------16
二、研究方法 --------------------------------------18
第三節 論述歩驟與章節設計 -------------------------19
第二章 《瀛奎律髓》編纂的動機與體例-----------------21
第一節 編纂動機 ----------------------------------21
一、原因動機 ---------------------------------------23
二、目的動機 ---------------------------------------25
第二節 選詩取向 ----------------------------------26
一、入選詩家及數量分析 -----------------------------27
二、 題材類型 --------------------------------------30
第三節 編排次序與評點方式 ------------------------35
一、編排次序 ---------------------------------------35
(一) 體製編排---------------------------------------35
(二) 作家及作品編次 --------------------------------36
二、評點方式 ------------------------------------37
第三章 方回《瀛奎律髓》詩學的本質論與功能論--------41
第一節 本質論－形神交融----------------------------41
一、主體情志的表現----------------------------------43
二、「無迹之工」的語言形式 -------------------------48
第二節 功能論－託意言志-- -------------------------51
第四章 方回《瀛奎律髓》詩學的創作論 --------------55
第一節 創作過程------------------------------------55
一、 主體的工夫修養---------------------------------55
二、 學古的態度與方法-------------------------------59
第二節 創作法則與修辭技巧--------------------------66
一、 活法-------------------------------------------66
二、 句眼-------------------------------------------70
三、 變體-------------------------------------------73
四、 用事-------------------------------------------76
第五章 方回《瀛奎律髓》詩學的批評論----------------81
第一節 以「格、意、語」為標準的批評原則 -----------81
一、 格高與格卑 ----------------------------------- 81
二、 意深不俗 --------------------------------------85
三、 語新句奇 --------------------------------------89
第二節 批評目的------------------------------------91
一、 詮釋-------------------------------------------91
二、 評價-------------------------------------------94
(一) 藝術性評價 ------------------------------------94
(二) 社會性評價 ------------------------------------97
(三) 文學史性評價 --------------------------------100
第六章 結論--------------------------------------103
附錄一：《瀛奎律髓》各卷唐、宋五七言律詩統計表-----108
參考書目-------------------------------------------110學號: 693000373, 學年度: 9
Lichenipolystoechotes Fang, Zheng & Wang 2020
No full textGenus Lichenipolystoechotes Fang, Zheng & Wang, 2020 Type species. Lichenipolystoechotes angustimaculatus Fang, Zheng & Wang, 2020 Other included species. Lichenipolystoechotes ramimaculatus Fang, Ma & Wang, 2020Published as part of Xu, Yifan, Zheng, Bingyu, Fang, Hui, Shih, Chungkun, Ren, Dong & Wang, Yongjie, 2021, New fossil giant lacewings from the Middle Jurassic Jiulongshan Formation of China (Neuroptera, Ithonidae), pp. 259-266 in Zootaxa 5067 (2) on page 262, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5067.2.7, http://zenodo.org/record/567797
Report on the SIGIR 2017 Workshop on Axiomatic Thinking for Information Retrieval and Related Tasks (ATIR)
No full textGoing Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Revised_Version_Suppl_Mat_CC_Risk_factors_in_China_Clean_corrected_JxG – Supplemental material for Systematic literature review of risk factors for cervical cancer in the Chinese population
No full textSupplemental material, Revised_Version_Suppl_Mat_CC_Risk_factors_in_China_Clean_corrected_JxG for Systematic literature review of risk factors for cervical cancer in the Chinese population by Xiao Li, Shang Ying Hu, Yunkun He, Leyla Hernandez Donoso, Kelly Qiao Qu, Georges Van Kriekinge and Fang Hui Zhao in Women’s Health</p
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
