1,720,954 research outputs found
Strategi Coping dan Dukungan Sosia terhadap Psychological Distress pada Family Caregiver Cancer
Kanker merupakan salah satu penyakit yang menjadi momok bagi masyarakat. Hal ini di karenakankan kanker merupakan salah satu penyakit yang dapat menyebabkan kematian. Individu yang mendapatkan diagnosa kanker akan mengalami keadaan shock dan perasaan sedih. Namun hal ini juga di alami keluarga pasien. Keluarga juga termasuk bagian terpenting dalam proses penyembuhan pasien kanker. Hal ini dikarenakan keluarga menjadi pendamping dalam pengobatan pasien. Family caregiver juga mengalami perasaan sedih, khawatir dan kecemasan. Distress yang dialami family caregiver akan memberikan hambatan pada keluarga. Sehingga dalam menangani hambatan distress, maka perlu adanya strategi coping dan dukungan sosial untuk membantu menyelesaikan permasalahan. Oleh karena itu penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara strategi coping dan dukungan social terhadap distress pada family caregiver cancer. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kuantitatif, dengan menggunakan skala Kesler psychological distress K10, skala dukungan social Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), dan skala strategi coping The Frech Ways of Coping Cheklist (WCCR). Subjek dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 63 subyek dengan melakukan teknik pengambilan data menggunakan teknik sampling insidental. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan uji instrument, uji prasyarat analisis meliputi uji normalitas dan uji linieritas hubungan antara variabel bebas dengan variabel terikat. Hasil Penelitian menunjukan terdapat hubungan positif antara strategi coping, dukungan sosial dan psychological distress pada family caregiver kanke
Mencegah kekambuhan pada pecandu narkoba: Bagaimana peranan craving dan dukungan keluarga? Preventing relapse in drug addicts: What is the role of craving and family support?
Previous research data shows that drug users who have undergone rehabilitation can still experience relapse, so research that identifies factors that cause relapse is essential. This study aims to examine the relationship between craving and family support with the tendency to relapse. The research participants were 97 drug addicts undergoing rehabilitation at several rehabilitation institutions in Surabaya and Gresik. The research scale was compiled by the researcher himself, consisting of a relapse scale (α = 0.935), which refers to the theory of Gorski and Miller, a craving scale (α = 0.899), which refers to Drummond's theory, and a family support scale (α = 0.949) which refers to Friedman's theory. The research data were analyzed using multiple regression tests. The results of the partial test showed that the higher the craving in people with an addiction who had undergone rehabilitation, the higher their tendency to relapse. However, the results of the partial test also proved that solid family support made the tendency to relapse lower. The results of the study simultaneously also showed that craving and family support were predictors of the tendency to relapse in drug addicts after rehabilitation. These findings are expected to broaden understanding of clinical psychology and provide practical guidelines for former addicts to prevent relapse through efforts to reduce cravings and increase family support
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
