8,540 research outputs found

    Neglected aspects of motion-event description: deixis, asymmetries, constructions Human cognitive processing ;, v. 72./ edited by Laure Sarda, Benjamin Fagard.

    No full text
    Includes bibliographical references and indexes."The idea of this book on "Neglected Aspects of Motion Event Descriptions" comes from the observation that, over the last 30 years, much attention has been devoted to the manner/path divide in relation to the distinction between Verb-Framed and Satellite-Framed languages. This mainstream focus has left aside other aspects of motion event descriptions. The chapters of this volume take an in-depth look at three less-studied aspects of motion expression. The first part of the book focusses on directional deixis, especially in relation to associated motion and visual motion. The second part explores variations in Source-Goal asymmetries. The third part investigates different types of motion event constructions, e.g., with various types of co-events. Many languages are taken into consideration throughout the 11 chapters, which gives the volume a clear typological dimension. This book is intended for students and academics interested in motion, spatial semantics, typological variation and cognitive linguistics"--Introduction : the description of motion events : on deixis, asymmetries and constructions / Laure Sarda and Benjamin Fagard -- What does deixis tell us about motion typology? Linguistic or cultural variations of speakers' "here" space vis-à-vis perceived physical events / Takahiro Morita -- Linguistic representations of visual motion : a crosslinguistic experimental study / Yo Matsumoto, Kimi Akita, Anna Bordilovskaya, Kiyoko Eguchi, Hiroaki Koga, Miho Mano, Ikuko Matsuse, Takahiro Morita, Naonori Nagaya, Kiyoko Takahashi, Ryosuke Takahashi and Yuko Yoshinari -- Deictic directionals revisited in the light of advances in typology / Christine Lamarre, Alice Vittrant, Anetta Kopecka, Sylvie Voisin, Noellie Bon, Benjamin Fagard, Colette Grinevald, Claire Moyse-Faurie, Annie Risler, Jin-Ke Song, Adeline Tan and Clément Voirin -- On a few instances where deictic directionals confound expectations / Philippe Bourdin -- Implicit landmarks and opposite polarities in French motion predicates / Michel Aurnague -- Source-goal asymmetry in Standard Chinese : a comparative study of spontaneous and caused motion events / Jin-Ke Song -- Source-goal asymmetry in German : a corpus study comparing intentional and non-intentional motion events / Laura Guse -- Co-event relations in Swedish motion constructions / Joel Olofsson -- The description of transitive directed motion in Lakhota (Siouan) / Rainer Osswald and Robert D. Van Valin -- Constraints constrained : equipollent verb constructions in Emai / Ronald P. Schaefer and Francis O. Egbokhare -- Lexical aspect and morphosyntactic cohesion between motion verbs and spatial particles in Homeric Greek / Castrenze Nigrelli.1 online resource (vi, 279 pages)

    Discours n°28

    No full text
    Coordination éditoriale du numéro : Benjamin Fagard et Mathilde Salles.Coordination éditoriale du numéro : Benjamin Fagard & Mathilde Salles. - Lisa Brunetti, Kordula De Kuthy et Arndt RiesterThe Information-Structural Status of Adjuncts: A Question-under-Discussion-Based Approach - Patrizia Giuliano et Simona AnastasioSubordination in Italian and English: Implications for Second Language Acquisition - Angèle Barbedette et Iris Eshkol-TaravellaQuand les questions en disent plus que les réponses : classification automatique des intentions dans les question

    6. La grammaticalisation en question : du latin aux langues romanes modernes

    No full text
    Benjamin Fagard montre que les facteurs d’évolution ne relèvent pas tous de la « grammaticalisation », souvent invoquée de manière abusive. Après la définition de la classe « préposition » et du processus « grammaticalisation » est retracée l’histoire de la formation de la classe, depuis d’indo-européen jusqu’aux langues romanes modernes, puis examinés les différents cas où est invoquée la grammaticalisation mais où cette explication trouve ses limites, comme dans le cas de l’emprunt (arabe hatta / espagnol hasta) ou de la lexicalisation (le nom provient de l’emploi prépositionnel, et non l’inverse)

    J.C. Painter letter to Benjamin Lundy

    No full text
    Letter from J.E. Painter to (presumably) Benjamin Lundy, answering a request for information about the history and operations of the Underground Railroad. Letter includes details of a story of an ex-slave transported on the Underground Railroad through Ohio and stories of the plight of other fugitive slaves crossing the Ohio River. Benjamin Lundy (1789-1839) was a prominent Quaker abolitionist best known for his development of abolitionist periodicals. His "Genius of Universal Emancipation" was first published in 1821 from his home in Mt. Pleasant, Ohio, and enjoyed a wide circulation across the antebellum United States. In the 1820s, the young William Lloyd Garrison came to work for The Genius. Benjamin Lundy traveled widely seeking subscriptions to The Genius, giving talks about the anti-slavery movement, and observing and documenting the conditions of enslaved people across the Americas. He was also involved in the establishment of freed slave colonies in Mexico

    Mexican land grant contract to Benjamin Lundy, March 10, 1835 (English)

    No full text
    Legal document from an unsigned officer to Benjamin Lundy, authorizing him rights as empresario to a tract of land in then-Mexico. The document extends a previous treaty made to Lundy by the government of Mexico from November 17, 1823 -- presumably, this land is to be the site of Lundy's freed slave colony. Original Spanish-language document is also a part of this collection. Benjamin Lundy (1789-1839) was a prominent Quaker abolitionist best known for his development of abolitionist periodicals. His Genius of Universal Emancipation was first published in 1821 from his home in Mt. Pleasant, Ohio, and enjoyed a wide circulation across the antebellum United States. In the 1820s, the young William Lloyd Garrison came to work for The Genius. Benjamin Lundy traveled widely seeking subscriptions to The Genius, giving talks about the anti-slavery movement, and observing and documenting the conditions of enslaved people across the Americas. He was also involved in the establishment of freed slave colonies in Mexico

    Eli Nichols letter to Benjamin Lundy, March 17th, 1839

    No full text
    Friendly note from Eli Nichols to Benjamin Lundy covering topics in contemporary abolition, ranging from the social status of abolitionists to the oppression of the poor. Much of the letter concerns a review of contemporary social movements in equality-based education, including Shaker and Quaker communities. The letter concludes in discussion of Nichols' and Lundy's interest in forming a freed slave colony or community in then-Mexico, and describes the climate and culture of those regions in detail. Benjamin Lundy (1789-1839) was a prominent Quaker abolitionist best known for his development of abolitionist periodicals. His Genius of Universal Emancipation was first published in 1821 from his home in Mt. Pleasant, Ohio, and enjoyed a wide circulation across the antebellum United States. In the 1820s, the young William Lloyd Garrison came to work for The Genius. Benjamin Lundy traveled widely seeking subscriptions to The Genius, giving talks about the anti-slavery movement, and observing and documenting the conditions of enslaved people across the Americas. He was also involved in the establishment of freed slave colonies in Mexico

    Mexican land grant contract to Benjamin Lundy, March 10, 1835 (Spanish)

    No full text
    Legal document in Spanish from the government of Tamaulipas, Mexico, to Benjamin Lundy, which appears to grant Lundy the rights of empresario for his proposed colony for freed slaves in Tamaulipas. This document appears to be truncated; it ends abruptly after 2 pages. Collection also includes a period translation of this contract with Lundy in English, which appears to contain the full text of the agreement. Benjamin Lundy (1789-1839) was a prominent Quaker abolitionist best known for his development of abolitionist periodicals. His Genius of Universal Emancipation was first published in 1821 from his home in Mt. Pleasant, Ohio, and enjoyed a wide circulation across the antebellum United States. In the 1820s, the young William Lloyd Garrison came to work for The Genius. Benjamin Lundy traveled widely seeking subscriptions to The Genius, giving talks about the anti-slavery movement, and observing and documenting the conditions of enslaved people across the Americas. He was also involved in the establishment of freed slave colonies in Mexico

    General Benjamin Butler Letter Regarding the naming of Newport News, Virginia

    No full text
    Digital images of an original letter written by Former Union Major-General Benjamin Butler in reply to a query by author, Edwin Everett Hale on how Newport News, Virginia had received it's name. both sides of the original letter are included along with a typed transcription of the letter

    Source/Goal (a)symmetry: A comparative study of German and Polish

    No full text
    International audienceThis paper compares the expression of Source and Goal in German and Polish, on the basis of descriptions elicited with a series of video clips. As satellite-framed languages (Talmy 1985, 2000), both German and Polish mainly rely on grammatical morphemes to encode Path of motion with respect to Source and Goal. Nevertheless, despite this shared typological feature, these languages also display fine morphosyntactic and semantic differences. Our study reveals that the expression of Source and Goal is more asymmetrical in German as compared to Polish, in both the types of linguistic resources and the semantic distinctions. We show that German speakers tend to combine Path satellites with Path verbsincluding both deictic satellites and deictic verbsmore frequently in Source-oriented events, depicting them with finer semantic distinctions than Goal-oriented events. In the expression of the Ground, however, they tend to make more distinctions in the expression of Goals as 2 Benjamin Fagard & Anetta Kopecka compared to Sources, by using a greater variety of prepositions. Polish speakers, by contrast, tend to express Source and Goal in a more symmetrical fashion. These cross-linguistic differences are discussed in the light of language-specific characteristics and their role in the expressionsymmetrical or asymmetricalof Source and Goal
    corecore