30 research outputs found
SPPS815919_suppl_mat - Can Threat Increase Support for Liberalism? New Insights Into the Relationship Between Threat and Political Attitudes
No full textSPPS815919_suppl_mat for Can Threat Increase Support for Liberalism? New Insights Into the Relationship Between Threat and Political Attitudes by Fade R. Eadeh, and Katharine K. Chang in Social Psychological and Personality Science</p
Eadeh and Chang (in press). Can Threat Increase Support for Liberalism? New Insights into the Relationship Between Threat and Political Attitudes
No full textThe extant literature demonstrates that exposure to threat almost always increases support for political conservatism (for a recent review, see Jost, Stern, Rule, & Sterling, 2017). But can threat increase support for political liberalism? The current article provides evidence that threat can increase aspects of political liberalism. Across three experiments, we find that experimentally manipulated threats to healthcare access (Experiment 1, N = 558), pollution (Experiment 2, N = 184), and corporate misconduct (Experiment 3, N = 225) produced increased support for components of liberalism. These findings fill a notable gap in the literature, broadening larger theoretical discussions of threat as a psychological construct and current understandings of experimentally manipulated attitudinal change
Eadeh and Chang (in press). Can Threat Increase Support for Liberalism? New Insights into the Relationship Between Threat and Political Attitudes
No full textThe extant literature demonstrates that exposure to threat almost always increases support for political conservatism (for a recent review, see Jost, Stern, Rule, & Sterling, 2017). But can threat increase support for political liberalism? The current article provides evidence that threat can increase aspects of political liberalism. Across three experiments, we find that experimentally manipulated threats to healthcare access (Experiment 1, N = 558), pollution (Experiment 2, N = 184), and corporate misconduct (Experiment 3, N = 225) produced increased support for components of liberalism. These findings fill a notable gap in the literature, broadening larger theoretical discussions of threat as a psychological construct and current understandings of experimentally manipulated attitudinal change
Eadeh and Chang (in press). Can Threat Increase Support for Liberalism? New Insights into the Relationship Between Threat and Political Attitudes
No full textThe extant literature demonstrates that exposure to threat almost always increases support for political conservatism (for a recent review, see Jost, Stern, Rule, & Sterling, 2017). But can threat increase support for political liberalism? The current article provides evidence that threat can increase aspects of political liberalism. Across three experiments, we find that experimentally manipulated threats to healthcare access (Experiment 1, N = 558), pollution (Experiment 2, N = 184), and corporate misconduct (Experiment 3, N = 225) produced increased support for components of liberalism. These findings fill a notable gap in the literature, broadening larger theoretical discussions of threat as a psychological construct and current understandings of experimentally manipulated attitudinal change
Experiment 1 Pre-Registration and Results
No full textThe purpose of our study is to determine whether the use of real-time information aids can improve performance by improving the participant’s strategic approach. Specifically, we examine whether the inclusion of a real-time map improved performance in an urban search and rescue task in Minecraft
