1,720,954 research outputs found

    EVALUASI INJEKSI SOLVENT UNTUK MENANGGULANGI PROBLEM PARAFIN PADA SUMUR “J” LAPANGAN “JIRAK” PT PERTAMINA EP FIELD PENDOPO

    Full text link
    Penurunan laju produksi yang drastis pada sumur “J” diidentifikasi karena adanya endapan parafin di formasi ketika melaksanakan well service. Identifikasi dilakukan dengan mengambil sampel fluida kemudian dilakukan analisa di laboratorium untuk menentuan harga pour point. Harga pour point diperlukan sebab apabila temperatur minyak di bawah pour point maka parafin mudah terbentuk. Berdasarkan harga gradien geothermal diperkirakan kedalaman dimana parafin terbentuk adalah pada kedalaman 0 -795.76 ft kemudian melakukan penentuan harga specific grafity, API, viskositas kinematik Penanggulangan problem parafin dilakukan dengan injeksi solvent yaitu menggunakan diesel dimana sebelumnya dilakukan compatibility test untuk mengetahui zat kimia yang tepat sehingga dapat digunakan untuk menanggulangi problem parafin. Prinsip kerja diesel yaitu melarutkan deposit parafin sehingga fluida dapat diproduksikan ke permukaan dengan mudah. Sebelum dilakukan injeksi solvent, terlebih dahulu di lakukan perencanaan yang meliputi penentuan tekanan rekah formasi (P ), tekanan maximum di permukaan (P max rf ), volume solvent (V). Evaluasi keberhasilan injeksi solvent dapat dilakukan berdasarkan analisa sampel minyak sumur “J” di laboratorium yaitu terjadi penurunan harga spesific grafity oil (SG) oil dari 0.8649 menjadi 0.8432, terjadi peningkatan harga API dari 32.10 menjadi 36.31, selanjutnya terjadi penurunan harga viskositas kinematik pada 100 0 F dari 30.56 cs menjadi 3.18 cs. Kemudian terjadi peningkatan laju produksi fluida dari 240 BFPD menjadi 396 BFPD. Peningkatan harga productivity indeks terjadi dari 0.52 BFPD/psi menjadi 0.91 BFPD/psi. Berdasarkan hasil evaluasi tersebut, injeksi solvent pada sumur “J” dapat dinyatakan berhasil

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore