1,720,993 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Is it time to change the neurofibromatosis 1 diagnostic criteria?
No full textNeurofibromatosis 1 is a complex inherited neurocutaneous disease that is often difficult to diagnose early because of its age-dependent presentation. The diagnosis is also extremely difficult to communicate to patients and their parents because of the disease's clinical variability, unpredictable evolution, and uncertain prognosis. Since 1988, the year of publication of the last Consensus Conference statement concerning the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis 1, our understanding of the disease has naturally increased and, in addition to the availability of increasingly precise molecular analyses, some new clinical signs have been reported such as anaemic nevi, unidentified bright objects, choroidal hamartomas, and a typical neuropsychological phenotype. We critically review the current diagnostic criteria, and suggest the addition of new signs on the basis of published findings and our own clinical experience. This proposal aims to improve diagnostic power in paediatric age, securing a better and more reliable healthcare transition toward adult age. We finally recommend a new Consensus Conference in order to revise the diagnostic criteria, possibly differentiated by age of presentation. © 2014 European Federation of Internal Medicine
Vaccination coverage of children with rare genetic diseases and attitudes of their parents towards vaccines
No full textDespite the fact that the achievement of appropriate immunization coverage for routine vaccines is a priority for health authorities worldwide, vaccination delays or missed opportunities for immunization are common in children with chronic diseases. The main aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate immunization coverage and the timeliness of vaccination in children suffering from three different rare genetic diseases: Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (RSTS), Sotos syndrome (SS), and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS). A total of 57 children with genetic diseases (15 with RSTS, 14 children with SS, and 28 with BWS) and 57 healthy controls with similar characteristics were enrolled. The coverage of all the recommended vaccines in children with genetic syndromes was significantly lower than that observed in healthy controls (p<0.05 for all the comparisons). However, when vaccinated, all of the patients, independent of the genetic syndrome from which they suffer, were administered the primary series and the booster doses at a similar time to healthy controls. In comparison with parents of healthy controls, parents of children with genetic diseases were found to more frequently have negative attitudes towards vaccination (p<0.05 for all the comparisons), mainly for fear of the emergence of adverse events or deterioration of the underlying disease. This study shows that vaccination coverage is poor in paediatric patients with RSTS, BWS, and SS and significantly lower than that observed in healthy children. These results highlight the need for educational programs specifically aimed at both parents and paediatricians to increase immunization coverage in children with these rare genetic diseases
Vaccination in children with inborn errors of metabolism
No full textInborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) are a large group of very heterogeneous diseases, and the impact of the available vaccines on children with IEMs may vary depending on the child's metabolic characteristics. The main aim of this review is to re-analyse the administration of vaccines to such children in the light of the most recent data. As a whole, these indicate that children with stable or slowly progressing IEMs can receive the recommended schedules of all of the recommended vaccinations. However, vaccines should be administered more cautiously to children with IEMs associated with a significant risk of morbidity and/or mortality with catabolic events: i.e. under strict medical supervision, and only when the children are clinically well and their metabolic condition is acceptably controlled. Furthermore, a number of IEMs have been associated with immune deficiency although, in most cases, the immunological abnormalities disappear or are significantly reduced when the metabolic defect is corrected. The response to vaccines is therefore unpredictable, but it is reasonable to think that it may be inadequate in children with the most severe immune defects. In addition to defective protection, vaccines administered to children with IEM and severe immunodeficiency can actually cause the disease they were meant to prevent. This explains why experts suggest that vaccines based on live attenuated viruses should not be given to such children, although all of the other vaccines can be administered without limitation regardless of the type of immune defect. Nevertheless, only specific multicentre studies will make it possible to say when and how to use vaccines in children with different types of IEM in order to protect them from vaccine-preventable diseases without any risk of worsening their metabolic situation
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
