1,721,670 research outputs found
Ernest D. Dick
No full textErnest D. Dick was president of the Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary from 1952 to1958. He also served as president of Potomac University from 1957 to 1959.https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/library-art/1009/thumbnail.jp
Ernest D. Mariani
No full textBlack and white photograph of Ernest D. Mariani, executive of the Ernest F. Mariani Company, President of the Utah Manufacturer\u27s Association, and a member of Board of Governors of the Salt Lake Area Chamber of Commerce
Interview with Ernest D. Tyler
Get PDFAn interview with Ernest D. Tyler (1895-1971) about life during World War I. Audio is on tape MS016_14-1_71-109.https://scholars.fhsu.edu/koh/1159/thumbnail.jp
Marriage record of Neeld, Ernest D. and Thompson, Bertha Gertrude
No full textMarriage license for Ernest D. Neeld and Bertha Gertrude Thompson. Henry Richards was the Notary Public
Hauterive (Ernest d'), La contre-police royaliste en 1800, 1931
No full textGodechot Jacques. Hauterive (Ernest d'), La contre-police royaliste en 1800, 1931. In: Revue d'histoire moderne, tome 7 N°5,1932. pp. 507-508
Reamer, Ernest D., Jr., 1913-1965 (SC 1845)
Get PDFFinding aid only for Manuscripts Small Collection 1845. Correspondence between Ernest D. Reamer, Jr. and his wife, Verna, while he was in the U.S. Army during World War II stationed at Ft. Campbell, Kentucky and Ft. Sill, Oklahoma
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
