1,720,961 research outputs found
Le déclin du principe d’incontestabilité des choix organisationnels de l’employeur en Italie
No full textLa «realtà oggettiva» della subordinazione nella giurisprudenza della Corte costituzionale
No full text
The decline of the principle of incontestability of the employer’s organisational choices in Italy
No full textFor a long time there has been a prevailing opinion among Italian jurists that excludes the power of the judge to control the adequacy of the organisational choices on the basis of which the employer can exercise his legal powers vis-à-vis the employees. However, some normative interventions in recent years, which have attributed to the judge, in relation to various matters, the power to assess the adequacy of the employer’s organisational choices, seem to lay the foundations for overcoming the traditional view.Il existe depuis longtemps une opinion majoritaire, parmi les juristes, italiens selon laquelle un juge ne dispose pas du pouvoir de contrôler la pertinence des choix organisationnels en vertu desquels l’employeur exerce ses prérogatives légales à l’égard des salariés. Toutefois, ces dernières années, certaines dispositions légales attribuant au juge, dans divers domaines, le pouvoir d’évaluer l’adéquation des choix organisationnels de l’employeur, semblent jeter les bases d’une remise en cause de la vision traditionnelle
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
