1,721,016 research outputs found
Challenges and Opportunities of Interoperability for Open Access Repositories
Get PDF开放获取知识库联盟（COAR）的Eloy Rodrigues介绍了国际机构知识库的互操作性框架。</span
Interview With Eloy Rodrigues: “There will ne no open science if the excessive and wrong use of metrics is not abandoned”
Get PDFEloy Rodrigues é membro do Grupo de Especialistas em Ciência 2.0/Ciência Aberta da Associação das Universidades Europeias, em representação do Conselho de Reitores das Universidades Portuguesas. Profundo conhecedor das questões da ciência aberta e um dos principais atores deste movimento em Portugal, é diretor dos Serviços de Documentação e Bibliotecas da Universidade do Minho (UMinho). É um dos principais advogados da adesão a práticas de ciência aberta e da inclusão do acesso aberto nas políticas institucionais. Coordenou a participação da UMinho em mais de uma dezena de projetos (como o OpenAIRE, https://www.openaire.eu/, e o FOSTER, https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/) financiados pela União Europeia e relacionados com os repositórios e a ciência aberta, sendo uma figura ímpar na concretização do acesso aberto a partir dos repositórios institucionais. Foi presidente do Conselho Executivo da Confederação de Repositórios de Acesso Aberto (https://www.coar-repositories.org/), de 2015 a 2021, e coordena, desde 2008, a equipa da UMinho que desenvolve o projeto Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (www.rcaap.pt).Eloy Rodrigues is a member of the Expert Group on Science 2.0/Open Science of the European University Association, representing the Council of Rectors of Portuguese Universities. Deeply aware of open science issues and one of the main stakeholders of this movement in Portugal, he is the director of the Documentation and Library Service of the University of Minho (UMinho) and one of the main advocates for the adherence to open science practices and for the inclusion of open access in institutional policies. Eloy Rodrigues has coordinated UMinho’s participation in more than a dozen projects (such as OpenAIRE, https://www.openaire.eu/, and FOSTER, https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/) funded by the European Union and concerning repositories and open science. He is a distinguished player in implementing open access from institutional repositories. He was the Chairperson of the Executive Board of the Confederation of Open Access Repositories (https://www.coar-repositories.org/) from 2015 to 2021 and is, since 2008, the coordinator of the UMinho team that develops the project Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Open Access Scientific Repositories of Portugal; www.rcaap.pt).Este trabalho é financiado por fundos nacionais através da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., no âmbito do projeto UIDB/00736/2020 (financiamento base) e UIDP/00736/2020 (financiamento programático)
Panel REMERI: “Políticas y Mandatos de Acceso Abierto” – 2
No full text09:15
Definición e Implementación de Mandatos de Acceso Abierto.- Eloy Rodrigues (Universidad de Minho)Presentación sobre “Definición e Implementación de Mandatos de Acceso Abierto”, impartida por Eloy Rodrigues de la Universidad de Minho
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
