1,721,203 research outputs found

    ELNI review

    No full text

    ELNI review

    No full text

    ELNI review

    No full text

    ELNI review

    No full text

    ELNI review

    No full text

    ELNI review

    No full text

    A Human’s Liberty to Protect Wild Animals – Challenging Nature Rights Dogmas and Renewing of European Environmental Legal Culture

    No full text
    In October 2024, the Conseil d'Etat, France's supreme administrative court, ruled that the State's decision to allow the hunting of the rock ptarmigan, a species protected by the European directive on the conservation of wild birds, constituted a violation of the human right to the environment. This is breaking new ground. This directly contradicts the dogma of nature rights advocates, according to which the personification of nature is the only possible way to protect the intrinsic value of nature, environmental law being vitiated by its pseudo anthropocentric character

    Ludwig Krämer, «The EU, access to environmental information and the open society », ELNI 2013

    No full text
    Emmanouilidou Pantelina. Ludwig Krämer, «The EU, access to environmental information and the open society », ELNI 2013. In: Revue Juridique de l'Environnement, n°3, 2014. pp. 591-592

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore