1,720,992 research outputs found
Unveiling soil food web links: New PCR assays for detection of prey DNA in the gut of soil arthropod predators
No full textMolecular gut content analysis provides a highly specific and sensitive tool to examine the diet of soil invertebrates. Here, we present new polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for the detection of twelve prey taxa common in Central European forest soils. The assays target five species of collembolans as well as dipterans, gamasid and oribatid mites, lithobiid centipedes, spiders, staphylinid beetles and woodlice at the group level, amplifying 123-299 bp long DNA fragments. Cross-reactivity tests against 119 soil invertebrate taxa confirm their specificity. These new PCR assays were found to be highly sensitive, revealing the consumption of five different prey taxa in field-collected centipedes. Thus they provide a ready-to-use approach for unravelling trophic interactions among soil arthropods. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Testing the validity of functional response models using molecular gut content analysis for prey choice in soil predators
No full textUnveiling soil food web links: New PCR assays for detection of prey DNA in the gut of soil arthropod predators
No full textMolecular gut content analysis provides a highly specific and sensitive tool to examine the diet of soil invertebrates. Here, we present new polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for the detection of twelve prey taxa common in Central European forest soils. The assays target five species of collembolans as well as dipterans, gamasid and oribatid mites, lithobiid centipedes, spiders, staphylinid beetles and woodlice at the group level, amplifying 123-299 bp long DNA fragments. Cross-reactivity tests against 119 soil invertebrate taxa confirm their specificity. These new PCR assays were found to be highly sensitive, revealing the consumption of five different prey taxa in field-collected centipedes. Thus they provide a ready-to-use approach for unravelling trophic interactions among soil arthropods. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Testing the effectiveness of different wash protocols to remove body surface contaminants in invertebrate food web studies
No full textMolecular gut content analysis via diagnostic PCR or high-throughput sequencing (metabarcoding) of consumers allows unravelling of feeding interactions in a wide range of animals. This is of particular advantage for analyzing the diet of small invertebrates living in opaque habitats such as the soil. Due to their small body size, which complicates dissection, microarthropods are subjected to whole-body DNA extraction-step before their gut content is screened for DNA of their food. This poses the problem that body surface contaminants, such as fungal spores may be incorrectly identified as ingested food particles for fungivorous species. We investigated the effectiveness of ten methods for body surface decontamination in litter-dwelling oribatid mites using Steganacarus magnus as model species. Furthermore, we tested for potential adverse effects of the decontamination techniques on the molecular detection of ingested prey organisms. Prior to decontamination, oribatid mites were fed with an oversupply of nematodes (Plectus sp.) and postmortem contaminated with fungal spores (Chaetomium globosum). We used diagnostic PCR with primers specific for C. globosum and Plectus sp. to detect contaminants and prey, respectively. The results suggest that chlorine bleach (sodium hypochloride, NaClO, 5%) is most efficient in removing fungal surface contamination without significantly affecting the detection of prey DNA in the gut. Based on these results, we provide a standard protocol for efficient body surface decontamination allowing to trace the prey spectrum of microarthropods using molecular gut content analysis
Testing the validity of functional response models using molecular gut content analysis for prey choice in soil predators
No full textAnalysis of predator–prey interactions is a core concept of animal ecology, explaining structure and dynamics of animal food webs. Measuring the functional response, i.e. the intake rate of a consumer as a function of prey density, is a powerful method to predict the strength of trophic links and assess motives of prey choice, particularly in arthropod communities. However, due to their reductionist set‐up, functional responses, which are based on laboratory feeding experiments, may not display field conditions, possibly leading to skewed results. Here, we tested the validity of functional responses of centipede predators and their prey by comparing them with empirical gut content data from field‐collected predators. Our predator–prey system included lithobiid and geophilomorph centipedes, abundant and widespread predators of forest soils and their soil‐dwelling prey. First, we calculated the body size‐dependent functional responses of centipedes using a published functional response model in which we included natural prey abundances and animal body masses. This allowed us to calculate relative proportions of specific prey taxa in the centipede diet. In a second step, we screened field‐collected centipedes for DNA of eight abundant soil‐living prey taxa and estimated their body size‐dependent proportion of feeding events. We subsequently compared empirical data for each of the eight prey taxa, on proportional feeding events with functional response‐derived data on prey proportions expected in the gut, showing that both approaches significantly correlate in five out of eight predator–prey links for lithobiid centipedes but only in one case for geophilomorph centipedes. Our findings suggest that purely allometric functional response models, which are based on predator–prey body size ratios are too simple to explain predator–prey interactions in a complex system such as soil. We therefore stress that specific prey traits, such as defence mechanisms, must be considered for accurate predictions.DFG Priority Program 1374 “Infrastructure-Biodiversity-Exploratories”German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-LeipzigGerman Research Foundation http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/50110000165
Data from: Effects of prey quality and predator body size on prey DNA detection success in a centipede predator
No full textPredator body size and prey quality are important factors driving prey choice and consumption rates. Both factors might affect prey detection success in PCR-based gut content analysis, potentially resulting in over- or underestimation of feeding rates. Experimental evidence, however, is scarce. We examined how body size and prey quality affect prey DNA detection success in centipede predators. Due to metabolic rates increasing with body size, we hypothesized that prey DNA detection intervals will be significantly shorter in large predators than in smaller ones. Moreover, we hypothesized that prey detection intervals of high-quality prey will be shorter than in low-quality prey due to faster assimilation. Small, medium and large individuals of Lithobius spp., abundant generalist predators in forest litter layers, were fed with Collembola and allowed to digest their prey for up to 168 h post-feeding. Additionally, medium-sized lithobiids were fed with either Diptera or Lumbricidae prey. No significant differences in 50% prey DNA detection success time intervals for a 272 bp prey DNA fragment were found between the predator size groups, indicating that predator body size does not affect prey DNA detection success. Post-feeding detection intervals were significantly shorter in Lumbricidae and Diptera compared to Collembola prey, apparently supporting the second hypothesis. However, sensitivity of diagnostic PCR differed between prey types and quantitative PCR revealed that concentration of targeted DNA varied significantly between prey types. This suggests that both DNA concentration and assay sensitivity need to be considered when assessing prey quality effects on prey DNA detection success
Variations in prey consumption of centipede predators in forest soils as indicated by molecular gut content analysis
No full textPredation is an important ecological factor driving animal population structures, community assemblages and consequently ecosystem stability and biodiversity. Many environmental factors influence direction and intensity of predation, suggesting that trophic linkages between animals vary between different habitats. This in consequence has particular relevance in anthropogenically altered habitats such as managed forests, where disturbance regime, tree composition and stand age may change the natural food web structure. We investigated how prey consumption of three common centipede predators (Lithobius spp., Chilopoda), representing two body sizes varies between four differently managed forest types in two regions across Germany. We hypothesized that prey preference of these generalist predators is independent of forest type but rather driven by habitat structure, prey abundance and predator body size. Applying specific PCR assays to test for DNA of three abundant prey groups, i.e. Collembola, Diptera and Lumbricidae, in the predators' guts, we tracked trophic interactions. The results showed that management type indeed has no influence on centipede prey consumption but depth of litter layer and soil pH. Trophic interactions varied between the two sampled forests regions mainly due to changes in the detection of Lumbricidae and Diptera. Also, effect of litter layer and prey abundance significantly differed between the smaller L. crassipes and the larger L. mutabilis, indicating a body size effect. The results complement food web analyses using fatty acids and stable isotopes by elucidating trophic interactions in soil in unprecedented detail
Trophic shift of soil animal species with forest type as indicated by stable isotope analysis
No full textAnthropogenic land use shapes the dynamics and composition of central European forests and changes the quality and availability of resources of the decomposer system. These changes likely alter the structure and functioning of soil animal food webs. Using stable isotope analysis (C-13, N-15) we investigated the trophic position and resource use of soil animal species in each of four forest types (coniferous, young managed beech, old managed beech and unmanaged beech forests) across three regions in Germany. Twenty-eight species of soil invertebrates were analyzed covering three consumer levels and a representative spectrum of feeding types and morphologies. Data on stable isotope signatures of leaf litter, fine roots and soil were included to evaluate to which extent signatures of soil animals vary with those of local resources. Soil animal N-15 and C-13 signatures varied with the respective signatures of leaf litter and fine roots. After calibration to leaf litter signatures, soil animal stable isotope signatures of the different beech forests did not differ significantly. However, thick leaf litter layers, such as those in coniferous forests, were associated with low animal stable isotope signatures presumably due to reduced access of decomposer animals to root-derived resources, suggesting that the decomposer food web is shifted towards leaf litter based energy pathways with the shift affecting all consumer levels. Variation in stable isotope signatures of soil animal species with litter quality parameters suggests that nutrition of third level but not first and second level consumers is related to litter quality, potentially due to microorganisms locking up litter resources thereby hampering their propagation to higher trophic levels.German Research Foundation (DFG) [1374
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
