10 research outputs found
Lossy mode resonance in photonic integrated circuits
The authors would like to acknowledge the Institute of Solid State Physics, University of Latvia. This research was supported by the European Regional Development Fund project 1.1.1.1/20/A/045 and the European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework Program H2020-WIDESPREAD-01-2016-2017-TeamingPhase2 under grant agreement No. 739508, project CAMART2.In recent years, the promising phenomenon known as lossy mode resonance (LMR) has garnered significant attention in sensing applications. While existing literature in the field of LMR focuses on optical fiber systems and planar waveguides due to their simplicity, there is an absence of research on systems based on photonic integrated circuits (PICs). This article aims to demonstrate, for the first time, the generation of LMR in PICs with sensitivity and a figure of merit (FOM) comparable to that of optical fibers and planar waveguides. Additionally, the article offers a comparison of various polymer materials such as OrmoClear, OrmoCore and SU-8 for integrated waveguides fabrication. To summarize, the main novelty of the article is the demonstration of the LMR phenomenon in integrated chips and the comparison of different polymers commonly used in photonics to fabricate these chips. Moreover, the authors present a novel fabrication workflow for thick polymer waveguides. Finally, the study compares the experimental results obtained with simulations conducted using the finite element method (FEM) in COMSOL Multiphysics environment. © 2024 --//-- This is an open-access article Edvins Letko, Arturs Bundulis, Edgars Vanags, Gatis Mozolevskis,
Lossy mode resonance in photonic integrated circuits, Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Volume 181, 2024, 108387, ISSN 0143-8166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2024.108387 published under the CC BY licence.European Regional Development Fund 1.1.1.1/20/A/045; European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework Program H2020-WIDESPREAD-01-2016-2017-TeamingPhase2 739508, project CAMART2
Tunable Filtering via Lossy Mode Resonance in Integrated Photonics
This study explores an integrated tunable filter based on lossy mode resonance (LMR) in TiOx thin films, modeled in COMSOL Multiphysics using the Wave Optics and Semiconductor modules. By exploiting the electro-optic (EO) modulation of free carrier concentration in TiOx, the LMR wavelength can be actively tuned under an applied electric field. The results demonstrate a tuning efficiency of 4.0 nm/V, which surpasses many reported EO tunable filters. Optimization studies reveal that thinner ITO electrodes and TiOx layers enhance tuning efficiency, while the initial bulk free carrier concentration has limited influence due to the compensating effect of the Debye length. These findings extend the applicability of LMR beyond sensing, highlighting its potential for active photonic components in integrated optics
Theoretical Development of Polymer-Based Integrated Lossy-Mode Resonance Sensor for Photonic Integrated Circuits
A promising phenomenon such as lossy-mode resonance (LMR) is of great interest in sensor applications. Until now, this phenomenon has been shown only in fibers or planar waveguides; however, given the rapid development of such an important technological area as photonic integrated circuits (PICs), it is important to transfer LMR technology specifically to PICs. In this article, we propose the theoretical development of an integrated polymer-based LMR sensor that will also contribute to the development of hybrid organic–inorganic PICs. This work theoretically shows that LMR can be achieved using polymer SU-8 waveguides on a glass substrate, on top of which TiO2 is deposited. In addition, the paper shows that multiple resonances can be achieved in the developed integrated sensor. The highest sensor sensitivity (about 1400 nm/RIU) was achieved with 40 nm of TiO2. The effect of the waveguide and coating geometries, as well as the polarizations of propagating modes, is studied in this paper
Photoinduced Anisotropy of IWK-2D Azobenzene Molecular Glassy Films
We have experimentally studied photoinduced anisotropy (PA) of holographic gratings in IWK-2D [precise chemical notation: 2-(3-(4-((4-(bis (2-(trityloxy) ethyl) amino) phenyl) diazenyl) styryl)-5,5-dimethylcyclohex-2-enylidene) malononitrile] azobenzene molecular glassy films in transmission and reflection modes using a special simultaneous holographic recording and readout setups which enabled measurements of PA time evolution. PA manifested itself by diffraction efficiency difference with linear s- and p-polarizations. Three different types of polarization holographic gratings were recorded and studied using p-p, L-L and L-R polarized beams creating different recording interference patterns. Atomic force microscope (AFM) was used to study the surface profile changes. Experimental evidence was obtained that the transmission mode PA was due to the both recorded surface relief and volume polarization gratings whereas the reflection mode PA was due to the recorded surface relief gratings. The main PA features were similar for all three types of polarization gratings whereas details were different. PA properties of IWK-2D films were notably distinctive from those of previously studied films.</jats:p
Validating Pseudo-Free-Space Conditions in a Planar Waveguide Using Phase Retrieval from Fresnel Diffraction Patterns
In this study, we address the question of whether a waveguide with absorbing sidewalls can be considered pseudo free space and if the free-space transfer function is valid in such a medium. We test this hypothesis by applying a phase retrieval algorithm based on the free-space transfer function. First, optical measurements are carried out to measure the optical properties of a stack of thin films and select the parameters of simulations. Next, the propagation of light in a waveguide was simulated in COMSOL, and the phase of a wave was retrieved in MATLAB. Analysis was performed both for free-space conditions, and for a waveguide with absorbing sidewalls. The cross-correlation between the distributions of intensity under both conditions was about 0.40. The RMS error of the wave retrieved under free-space conditions was 0.378 rad, while that in the case of absorbing sidewalls was 0.323 rad, indicating successful retrieval. The successfully recovered phase of the input wave suggests that a waveguide with absorbing sidewalls can be approximated as pseudo free space and the free-space transfer function may be valid. These results may be used in future studies on how to shorten the phase retrieval of two-dimensional objects
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in human NPC1 influence filovirus entry into cells
Niemann-Pick C1 (NPC1), a host receptor involved in the envelope glycoprotein (GP)-mediated entry of filoviruses into cells, is believed to be a major determinant of cell susceptibility to filovirus infection. It is known that proteolytically digested Ebola virus (EBOV) GP interacts with 2 protruding loops in domain C of NPC1. Using previously published structural data and the National Center for Biotechnology Information Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) database, we identified 10 naturally occurring missense SNPs in human NPC1. To investigate whether these SNPs affect cell susceptibility to filovirus infection, we generated Vero E6 cell lines stably expressing NPC1 with SNP substitutions and compared their susceptibility to vesicular stomatitis virus pseudotyped with filovirus GPs and infectious EBOV. We found that some of the substitutions resulted in reduced susceptibility to filoviruses, as indicated by the lower titers and smaller plaque/focus sizes of the viruses. Our data suggest that human NPC1 SNPs may likely affect host susceptibility to filoviruses
Takayasu disease presenting as malignant pyoderma gangrenosum in a child with relapsing polychondritis
A 7-year-old Lebanese girl with recently diagnosed relapsing polychondritis had a 1-month history of several painful ulcerations involving her entire body. Skin biopsy was consistent with the diagnosis of pyoderma gangrenosum. She was hospitalized and started on intravenous steroids with partial improvement. During her hospital stay, she developed right wrist drop. Radiologic studies revealed a large aortic aneurysm and an axillary aneurysm compressing the right brachial nerve plexus. Pathology of the resected aortic anyeurism confirmed the diagnosis of Takayasu's arteritis. The patient was started on infliximab therapy with complete resolution of her skin lesions and improvement in hand function. © 2008 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.Aoussar A, 2007, ANN DERMATOL VENER, V134, P264, DOI 10.1016-S0151-9638(07)91510-0; Barretto SN, 2002, MAYO CLIN PROC, V77, P971; Bell D, 2007, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V120, P1087, DOI 10.1097-01.prs.0000278184.60488.8e; Brooklyn TN, 2006, GUT, V55, P505, DOI 10.1136-gut.2005.074815; Cazabon S, 2005, EYE, V19, P222, DOI 10.1038-sj.eye.6701457; Fearfield LA, 1999, BRIT J DERMATOL, V141, P339; Hewitt D, 2007, AUSTRALAS J DERMATOL, V48, P95, DOI 10.1111-j.1440-0960.2007.00344.x; Hoffman GS, 2004, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V50, P2296, DOI 10.1002-art.20300; Hubbard VG, 2005, BRIT J DERMATOL, V152, P1059, DOI 10.1111-J.1365-2133.2005.06467.x; Jolly M, 2005, JCR-J CLIN RHEUMATOL, V11, P213, DOI 10.1097-01.rhu.0000173218.28013.3e; Kanemitsu S, 2005, ANN THORAC SURG, V80, P1914, DOI 10.1016-j.athoracsur.2004.06.098; Karageorgaki ZT, 2007, CLIN RHEUMATOL, V26, P984, DOI 10.1007-s10067-006-0227-0; Letko E, 2002, SEMIN ARTHRITIS RHEU, V31, P384, DOI 10.1053-sarh.2002.32586; MCADAM LP, 1976, MEDICINE, V55, P193, DOI 10.1097-00005792-197605000-00001; Monsel G, 2007, ANN DERMATOL VENER, V134, P552; Moroki N, 1979, Nihon Naika Gakkai Zasshi, V68, P1133; Mpofu S, 2003, RHEUMATOLOGY, V42, P1117, DOI 10.1093-rheumatology-keg280; Piette JC, 1999, ANN RHEUM DIS, V58, P656, DOI 10.1136-ard.58.10.656; PRESMANES MM, 2001, ACTA DERMOSIFILIOGR, V92, P596; Rapini RP, 2006, CLIN DERMATOL, V24, P482, DOI 10.1016-j.clindermatol.2006.07.018; Rho YH, 2005, J RHEUMATOL, V32, P954; Richez C, 2004, CLIN EXP RHEUMATOL, V22, P629; Saadoun D, 2003, J RHEUMATOL, V30, P1394; Sapienza MS, 2004, DIGEST DIS SCI, V49, P1454, DOI 10.1023-B:DDAS.0000042245.20042.4f; Sasirekha D, 2006, J Assoc Physicians India, V54, P817; Selim AGA, 2001, J CLIN PATHOL, V54, P890; Swale VJ, 2005, CLIN EXP DERMATOL, V30, P134, DOI 10.1111-j.1365-2230.2004.01681.x; Tanaka F, 2006, INTERNAL MED, V45, P313, DOI 10.2169-internalmedicine.45.1377; Ujiie H, 2004, CLIN EXP DERMATOL, V29, P357, DOI 10.1111-j.1365-2230.2004.01514.x; Vounotrypidis P, 2006, RHEUMATOLOGY, V45, P491, DOI 10.1093-rheumatology-kel04185
PREreview of "Revisiting tradeoffs in Rubisco kinetic parameters"
We, the students of MICI5029/5049, a Graduate Level Molecular Pathogenesis Journal Club at Dalhousie University in Halifax, NS, Canada, hereby submit a review of the following BioRxiv preprint:Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for lineage B β-coronaviruses, including 2019-nCoV. (2020) Michael Letko and Vincent Munster. bioRxiv doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.22.915660We will adhere to the Universal Principled (UP) Review guidelines proposed in:Universal Principled Review: A Community-Driven Method to Improve Peer Review. Krummel M, Blish C, Kuhns M, Cadwell K, Oberst A, Goldrath A, Ansel KM, Chi H, O'Connell R, Wherry EJ, Pepper M; Future Immunology Consortium. Cell. 2019 Dec 12;179(7):1441-1445. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.029.SUMMARY: Letko and Munster report a new functional viromics platform whereby receptor binding domains (RBDs) from different lineage B betacoronaviruses were cloned into a codon-optimized gene for SARS CoV spike protein which was then incorporated into pseudotyped VSV particles for functional assays. Entry was indicated by luciferase reporter activity. This screen facilitated rapid identification of RBD-receptor interactions, with less expense than previous methods. The authors confirmed previous findings that only RBDs belonging to clade-1 of the B-lineage of beta-coronaviruses use the ACE2 receptor. Furthermore, the authors showed that for a variety of B-lineage coronaviruses, protease treatment prior to infection enhances entry into different cell types from different species. They confirmed that protease treatment enhanced receptor-dependent viral entry. By introducing 14 amino acids known to contact the ACE2 receptor into clade-2 and clade-3 RBDs, the authors confirmed that these AAs are important for ACE2 recognition. They also determined that the surrounding AA sequence context is important for ACE2 recognition. Finally, they showed that the new 2019-nCoV coronavirus (now known as SARS-CoV-2 according to the ICTV) is related to Clade-1 betacoronaviruses, similar to SARS, and also utilizes the ACE2 entry receptor.OVERALL ASSESSMENT: STRENGTHS: Overall, we conclude that this is a scientifically sound and well-written article by Letko and Munster. The authors' conclusions are generally well-supported by the data. The authors report a screen that is rapid, effective, and cost-efficient compared to previous methods to screen coronavirus receptor usage. The authors were also the first to show that SARS-CoV-2 uses the ACE2 receptor similar to SARS. This demonstrates the effectiveness and rapidity of their screen. The authors confirmed results from previous studies that protease treatment aids viral entry but is not sufficient to promote viral entry into cells that lack cognate receptors. Overall this a strong manuscript that provides important information relevant to the current SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.WEAKNESSES: Some improvements could be made to strengthen the manuscript and provide better support for the authors' conclusions. This study relies heavily on a well-controlled luciferase reporter assay; the use of another well-established virus-receptor binding assay would strengthen the dataset surrounding the successful binding of synthesized RBDs and their receptors. No statistical tests were applied to the luciferase reporter data, and the replicates appear to be technical replicates only. Pursuing multiple biological replicates and performing appropriate statistical analysis would strengthen the authors' claims. Finally, the Methods require further exposition to allow these experiments to be replicated by others, in particular concerning the luciferase assays, protease treatments, and infections (MOI and titering) (see specific comments below). Further development of the methods is critical to describe this important advance in the field. DETAILED U.P. ASSESSMENT:OBJECTIVE CRITERIA (QUALITY)Quality: Experiments (1–3 scale) SCORE = 1Figure by figure, do experiments, as performed, have the proper controls?Yes, experiments as performed have the proper controls, consistent with other research in the field.Are specific analyses performed using methods that are consistent with answering the specific question?Yes, the methods are appropriate to address the research question. The authors should provide some rationale to support the choice of cell lines used in this study. Would other cell lines been appropriate as well (see cell lines used here: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007870)?Is there the appropriate technical expertise in the collection and analysis of data presented?Additional clear rationale for some experiments would strengthen the study. What is the rationale for the choice of protease and for the use of protease treatment prior to infection? What is the rationale for the different cell lines used? It is unclear why certain modifications in the RBD would result in reduced spike protein accumulation and impair pseudotype incorporation. The reader would benefit from additional information in the Discussion that addresses this issue. Do analyses use the best-possible (most unambiguous) available methods quantified via appropriate statistical comparisons?Statistical analysis was not performed on luciferase experiments.Are controls or experimental foundations consistent with established findings in the field? A review that raises concerns regarding inconsistency with widely reproduced observations should list at least two examples in the literature of such results. Addressing this question may occasionally require a supplemental figure that, for example, re-graphs multi-axis data from the primary figure using established axes or gating strategies to demonstrate how results in this paper line up with established understandings. It should not be necessary to defend exactly why these may be different from established truths, although doing so may increase the impact of the study and discussion of discrepancies is an important aspect of scholarship.Yes, it is well known at SARS-CoV uses the ACE2 receptor, and those results were recapitulated here as well as the finding that MERS-CoV uses the DPP4 receptor.There are now also several BioRxiv pre-prints that show, through different methods, that SARS-CoV-2 uses the ACE2 entry receptor.Quality: Completeness (1–3 scale) SCORE = 1.5Does the collection of experiments and associated analysis of data support the proposed title- and abstract-level conclusions? Typically, the major (title- or abstract-level) conclusions are expected to be supported by at least two experimental systems.The authors' conclusions rely heavily on the luciferase reporter system. Could these findings be validated using an alternative method? Much of the Results and Discussion focus on protease treatment and proteolytic cleavage of the chimeric spike constructs, but the authors do not show what trypsin treatment does to their chimeric constructs besides enhancing entry into cells in a receptor-dependent manner. Perhaps they could have used protease inhibitors to provide further support for their claim that proteases can be a barrier to viral entry (cathepsin L, for example, cleaves the SARS spike and cathepsin L inhibitors are readily available). Alternatively, they could have used a western blotting approach to demonstrate proteolytic processing of Spike (trypsin treatment vs. untreated; the chimeric RBD-Spike constructs are already FLAG-tagged to facilitate western blotting).Are there experiments or analyses that have not been performed but if ''true'' would disprove the conclusion (sometimes considered a fatal flaw in the study)? In some cases, a reviewer may propose an alternative conclusion and abstract that is clearly defensible with the experiments as presented, and one solution to ''completeness'' here should always be to temper an abstract or remove a conclusion and to discuss this alternative in the discussion section.We don't see a fatal flaw in the study. Although there are a variety of techniques to investigate viral entry besides luciferase assays and pseudotyped particles, we think that it is unlikely that they would provide conflicting data. Quality: Reproducibility (1–3 scale) SCORE = 2Figure by figure, were experiments repeated per a standard of 3 repeats or 5 mice per cohort, etc.?Most figures contain panels with multiple replicates (n=3), although they appear to be technical replicates rather than biological replicates. Having biological replicates would strengthen the data.Statistics could be performed on experiments with multiple biological replicates. Pursuing statistical analysis would enhance the strength of the claims in all figures.Is there sufficient raw data presented to assess rigor of the analysis?Yes. Raw luciferase assay data is not typically presented in the field.Are methods for experimentation and analysis adequately outlined to permit reproducibility?We struggled to fully understand the methods for infection of target cells with pseudotyped VSV. Generally, the use of protease before the infection was unclear and we were unsure how that could reasonably be expected to increase infectivity (see this paper which describes what we understand to be the current consensus on proteolytic cleavage in coronavirus https://www.pnas.org/content/114/42/11157). Some literature even suggested that pretreatment with trypsin would decrease infectivity (ex. PMID: 19924243). Overall, we suggest that the "Luciferase-based cell entry assay" method be clarified to include enough information for it to be reasonably reproduced, as well as to explain the rationale for protease treatment before infection and for using trypsin instead of another cellular protease. If these methods are well-established in the literature, that literature should be cited here. The authors should describe how pseudoparticle titration was performed and the MOI used for each experiment. Quality: Scholarship (1–4 scale but generally not the basis for acceptance or rejection) SCORE = 1Has the author cited and discussed the merits of the relevant data that would argue against their conclusion?Yes.Has the author cited and/or discussed the important works that are consistent with their conclusion and that a reader should be especially familiar when considering the work?Yes, with the exception of the protease literature.Specific (helpful) comments on grammar, diction, paper structure, or data presentation (e.g., change a graph style or color scheme) go in this section, but scores in this area should not be significant bases for decisions.Generally, the use of colour in the figures was quite helpful throughout the manuscript. However, in Figure 3A, the colour codes on the represented spike proteins are not identified. For clarity, we suggest that the authors identify what their orange and blue boxes represent.In Figure 5, the graphs (panels C and D) are in a different orientation than all the previous iterations of similar data in previous figures. We suggest that the authors redraw this graph in a vertical orientation for consistency. As well, the titles on panels C and D should be in a consistent format. Figure S4 could be moved into the main text to better support the following claim: "However, the 2019-nCoV RBD contains most of the contact points with human ACE2 that are found in clade 1 as well as some amino acid variations that are unique to clade 2 and 3 (figure s4b). Taken together with our receptor assay results, it may be possible that 2019-nCoV arose from recombination between clade 1 and the other clades." This is a strong (and very interesting) claim, which the authors provide some evidence for and can be found in other recent pre-prints on this topic, but they do not mention it again until the Discussion. This should be discussed in more detail in the Results.Figure S1C shows something similar, that 2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2 clusters separately. Then Fig S4B shows that can be the result of a recombination. Although the paper's focus is not 2019-ncov in particular, due to the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, we think it's important to include this in the main Results section. MORE SUBJECTIVE CRITERIA (IMPACT)Impact: Novelty/Fundamental and Broad Interest (1–4 scale) SCORE = 1A score here should be accompanied by a statement delineating the most interesting and/or important conceptual finding(s), as they stand right now with the current scope of the paper. A ''1'' would be expected to be understood for the importance by a layperson but would also be of top interest (have lasting impact) on the field.The authors report a new functional viromics screen that is inexpensive, rapid and accurate, which stands to be the most important contribution. However, it will also be of broad interest to the research community that their screen quickly identified the receptor used by the SARS-CoV-2 virus causing current outbreaks in Wuhan, China.This screen is also valuable because it can be conducted at reduced biosafety levels (BSL2).How big of an advance would you consider the findings to be if fully supported but not extended? It would be appropriate to cite literature to provide context for evaluating the advance. However, great care must be taken to avoid exaggerating what is known comparing these findings to the current dogma (see Box 2). Citations (figure by figure) are essential here.There is consensus that the creation of a new screen to identify coronavirus receptor binding domain specificity is an important advance for the field. This new method provides an efficient and cost-effective way to investigate receptor-binding specificity of any newly discovered betacoronavirus. One potential limitation of this system is that it can be used to determine which known receptor the coronavirus uses to enter the cells but cannot be used to identify unknown receptors. This doesn't diminish the importance of the system, but this limitation could be explored briefly in the Discussion.Impact: Extensibility (1–4 or N/A scale) SCORE = N/AHas an initial result (e.g., of a paradigm in a cell line) been extended to be shown (or implicated) to be important in a bigger scheme (e.g., in animals or in a human cohort)?This criterion is only valuable as a scoring parameter if it is present, indicated by the N/A option if it simply doesn't apply. The extent to which this is necessary for a result to be considered of value is important. It should be explicitly discussed by a reviewer why it would be required. What work (scope and expected time) and/or discussion would improve this score, and what would this improvement add to the conclusions of the study? Care should be taken to avoid casually suggesting experiments of great cost (e.g., ''repeat a mouse-based experiment in humans'') and difficulty that merely confirm but do not extend (see Bad Behaviors, Box 2)
Review of Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for lineage B β-coronaviruses, including 2019-nCoV
This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/3678320.
We, the students of MICI5029/5049, a Graduate Level Molecular Pathogenesis Journal Club at Dalhousie University in Halifax, NS, Canada, hereby submit a review of the following BioRxiv preprint:
Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for lineage B β-coronaviruses, including 2019-nCoV. (2020) Michael Letko and Vincent Munster. bioRxiv doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.22.915660
We will adhere to the Universal Principled (UP) Review guidelines proposed in:
Universal Principled Review: A Community-Driven Method to Improve Peer Review. Krummel M, Blish C, Kuhns M, Cadwell K, Oberst A, Goldrath A, Ansel KM, Chi H, O'Connell R, Wherry EJ, Pepper M; Future Immunology Consortium. Cell. 2019 Dec 12;179(7):1441-1445. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.029.
SUMMARY: Letko and Munster report a new functional viromics platform whereby receptor binding domains (RBDs) from different lineage B betacoronaviruses were cloned into a codon-optimized gene for SARS CoV spike protein which was then incorporated into pseudotyped VSV particles for functional assays. Entry was indicated by luciferase reporter activity. This screen facilitated rapid identification of RBD-receptor interactions, with less expense than previous methods. The authors confirmed previous findings that only RBDs belonging to clade-1 of the B-lineage of beta-coronaviruses use the ACE2 receptor. Furthermore, the authors showed that for a variety of B-lineage coronaviruses, protease treatment prior to infection enhances entry into different cell types from different species. They confirmed that protease treatment enhanced receptor-dependent viral entry. By introducing 14 amino acids known to contact the ACE2 receptor into clade-2 and clade-3 RBDs, the authors confirmed that these AAs are important for ACE2 recognition. They also determined that the surrounding AA sequence context is important for ACE2 recognition. Finally, they showed that the new 2019-nCoV coronavirus (now known as SARS-CoV-2 according to the ICTV) is related to Clade-1 betacoronaviruses, similar to SARS, and also utilizes the ACE2 entry receptor.
OVERALL ASSESSMENT:
STRENGTHS: Overall, we conclude that this is a scientifically sound and well-written article by Letko and Munster. The authors' conclusions are generally well-supported by the data. The authors report a screen that is rapid, effective, and cost-efficient compared to previous methods to screen coronavirus receptor usage. The authors were also the first to show that SARS-CoV-2 uses the ACE2 receptor similar to SARS. This demonstrates the effectiveness and rapidity of their screen. The authors confirmed results from previous studies that protease treatment aids viral entry but is not sufficient to promote viral entry into cells that lack cognate receptors. Overall this a strong manuscript that provides important information relevant to the current SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.
WEAKNESSES: Some improvements could be made to strengthen the manuscript and provide better support for the authors' conclusions. This study relies heavily on a well-controlled luciferase reporter assay; the use of another well-established virus-receptor binding assay would strengthen the dataset surrounding the successful binding of synthesized RBDs and their receptors. No statistical tests were applied to the luciferase reporter data, and the replicates appear to be technical replicates only. Pursuing multiple biological replicates and performing appropriate statistical analysis would strengthen the authors' claims. Finally, the Methods require further exposition to allow these experiments to be replicated by others, in particular concerning the luciferase assays, protease treatments, and infections (MOI and titering) (see specific comments below). Further development of the methods is critical to describe this important advance in the field.
DETAILED U.P. ASSESSMENT:
OBJECTIVE CRITERIA (QUALITY)
1. Quality: Experiments (1–3 scale) SCORE = 1
Figure by figure, do experiments, as performed, have the proper controls?
● Yes, experiments as performed have the proper controls, consistent with other research in the field.
Are specific analyses performed using methods that are consistent with answering the specific question?
● Yes, the methods are appropriate to address the research question.
● The authors should provide some rationale to support the choice of cell lines used in this study. Would other cell lines been appropriate as well (see cell lines used here: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007870)?
Is there the appropriate technical expertise in the collection and analysis of data presented?
● Additional clear rationale for some experiments would strengthen the study. What is the rationale for the choice of protease and for the use of protease treatment prior to infection? What is the rationale for the different cell lines used?
● It is unclear why certain modifications in the RBD would result in reduced spike protein accumulation and impair pseudotype incorporation. The reader would benefit from additional information in the Discussion that addresses this issue.
Do analyses use the best-possible (most unambiguous) available methods quantified via appropriate statistical comparisons?
● Statistical analysis was not performed on luciferase experiments.
Are controls or experimental foundations consistent with established findings in the field? A review that raises concerns regarding inconsistency with widely reproduced observations should list at least two examples in the literature of such results. Addressing this question may occasionally require a supplemental figure that, for example, re-graphs multi-axis data from the primary figure using established axes or gating strategies to demonstrate how results in this paper line up with established understandings. It should not be necessary to defend exactly why these may be different from established truths, although doing so may increase the impact of the study and discussion of discrepancies is an important aspect of scholarship.
● Yes, it is well known at SARS-CoV uses the ACE2 receptor, and those results were recapitulated here as well as the finding that MERS-CoV uses the DPP4 receptor.
● There are now also several BioRxiv pre-prints that show, through different methods, that SARS-CoV-2 uses the ACE2 entry receptor.
Quality: Completeness (1–3 scale) SCORE = 1.5
Does the collection of experiments and associated analysis of data support the proposed title- and abstract-level conclusions? Typically, the major (title- or abstract-level) conclusions are expected to be supported by at least two experimental systems.
● The authors' conclusions rely heavily on the luciferase reporter system. Could these findings be validated using an alternative method?
● Much of the Results and Discussion focus on protease treatment and proteolytic cleavage of the chimeric spike constructs, but the authors do not show what trypsin treatment does to their chimeric constructs besides enhancing entry into cells in a receptor-dependent manner. Perhaps they could have used protease inhibitors to provide further support for their claim that proteases can be a barrier to viral entry (cathepsin L, for example, cleaves the SARS spike and cathepsin L inhibitors are readily available). Alternatively, they could have used a western blotting approach to demonstrate proteolytic processing of Spike (trypsin treatment vs. untreated; the chimeric RBD-Spike constructs are already FLAG-tagged to facilitate western blotting).
Are there experiments or analyses that have not been performed but if ''true'' would disprove the conclusion (sometimes considered a fatal flaw in the study)? In some cases, a reviewer may propose an alternative conclusion and abstract that is clearly defensible with the experiments as presented, and one solution to ''completeness'' here should always be to temper an abstract or remove a conclusion and to discuss this alternative in the discussion section.
● We don't see a fatal flaw in the study. Although there are a variety of techniques to investigate viral entry besides luciferase assays and pseudotyped particles, we think that it is unlikely that they would provide conflicting data.
Quality: Reproducibility (1–3 scale) SCORE = 2
Figure by figure, were experiments repeated per a standard of 3 repeats or 5 mice per cohort, etc.?
● Most figures contain panels with multiple replicates (n=3), although they appear to be technical replicates rather than biological replicates. Having biological replicates would strengthen the data.
● Statistics could be performed on experiments with multiple biological replicates. Pursuing statistical analysis would enhance the strength of the claims in all figures.
Is there sufficient raw data presented to assess rigor of the analysis?
● Yes. Raw luciferase assay data is not typically presented in the field.
Are methods for experimentation and analysis adequately outlined to permit reproducibility?
● We struggled to fully understand the methods for infection of target cells with pseudotyped VSV. Generally, the use of protease before the infection was unclear and we were unsure how that could reasonably be expected to increase infectivity (see this paper which describes what we understand to be the current consensus on proteolytic cleavage in coronavirus https://www.pnas.org/content/114/42/11157). Some literature even suggested that pretreatment with trypsin would decrease infectivity (ex. PMID: 19924243). Overall, we suggest that the "Luciferase-based cell entry assay" method be clarified to include enough information for it to be reasonably reproduced, as well as to explain the rationale for protease treatment before infection and for using trypsin instead of another cellular protease. If these methods are well-established in the literature, that literature should be cited here.
● The authors should describe how pseudoparticle titration was performed and the MOI used for each experiment.
Quality: Scholarship (1–4 scale but generally not the basis for acceptance or rejection) SCORE = 1
Has the author cited and discussed the merits of the relevant data that would argue against their conclusion?
● Yes.
Has the author cited and/or discussed the important works that are consistent with their conclusion and that a reader should be especially familiar when considering the work?
● Yes, with the exception of the protease literature.
Specific (helpful) comments on grammar, diction, paper structure, or data presentation (e.g., change a graph style or color scheme) go in this section, but scores in this area should not be significant bases for decisions.
● Generally, the use of colour in the figures was quite helpful throughout the manuscript. However, in Figure 3A, the colour codes on the represented spike proteins are not identified. For clarity, we suggest that the authors identify what their orange and blue boxes represent.
● In Figure 5, the graphs (panels C and D) are in a different orientation than all the previous iterations of similar data in previous figures. We suggest that the authors redraw this graph in a vertical orientation for consistency. As well, the titles on panels C and D should be in a consistent format.
● Figure S4 could be moved into the main text to better support the following claim: "However, the 2019-nCoV RBD contains most of the contact points with human ACE2 that are found in clade 1 as well as some amino acid variations that are unique to clade 2 and 3 (figure s4b). Taken together with our receptor assay results, it may be possible that 2019-nCoV arose from recombination between clade 1 and the other clades." This is a strong (and very interesting) claim, which the authors provide some evidence for and can be found in other recent pre-prints on this topic, but they do not mention it again until the Discussion. This should be discussed in more detail in the Results.
● Figure S1C shows something similar, that 2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2 clusters separately. Then Fig S4B shows that can be the result of a recombination. Although the paper's focus is not 2019-ncov in particular, due to the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, we think it's important to include this in the main Results section.
MORE SUBJECTIVE CRITERIA (IMPACT)
1.Impact: Novelty/Fundamental and Broad Interest (1–4 scale) SCORE = 1
A score here should be accompanied by a statement delineating the most interesting and/or important conceptual finding(s), as they stand right now with the current scope of the paper. A ''1'' would be expected to be understood for the importance by a layperson but would also be of top interest (have lasting impact) on the field.
● The authors report a new functional viromics screen that is inexpensive, rapid and accurate, which stands to be the most important contribution. However, it will also be of broad interest to the research community that their screen quickly identified the receptor used by the SARS-CoV-2 virus causing current outbreaks in Wuhan, China.
● This screen is also valuable because it can be conducted at reduced biosafety levels (BSL2).
How big of an advance would you consider the findings to be if fully supported but not extended? It would be appropriate to cite literature to provide context for evaluating the advance. However, great care must be taken to avoid exaggerating what is known comparing these findings to the current dogma (see Box 2). Citations (figure by figure) are essential here.
● There is consensus that the creation of a new screen to identify coronavirus receptor binding domain specificity is an important advance for the field. This new method provides an efficient and cost-effective way to investigate receptor-binding specificity of any newly discovered betacoronavirus.
● One potential limitation of this system is that it can be used to determine which known receptor the coronavirus uses to enter the cells but cannot be used to identify unknown receptors. This doesn't diminish the importance of the system, but this limitation could be explored briefly in the Discussion.
Impact: Extensibility (1–4 or N/A scale) SCORE = N/A
Has an initial result (e.g., of a paradigm in a cell line) been extended to be shown (or implicated) to be important in a bigger scheme (e.g., in animals or in a human cohort)?
This criterion is only valuable as a scoring parameter if it is present, indicated by the N/A option if it simply doesn't apply. The extent to which this is necessary for a result to be considered of value is important. It should be explicitly discussed by a reviewer why it would be required. What work (scope and expected time) and/or discussion would improve this score, and what would this improvement add to the conclusions of the study? Care should be taken to avoid casually suggesting experiments of great cost (e.g., ''repeat a mouse-based experiment in humans'') and difficulty that merely confirm but do not extend (see Bad Behaviors, Box 2)
Role of RSA in Chinese economic impulse for Africa
Zdigitalizowano i udostępniono w ramach projektu pn. Rozbudowa otwartych zasobów naukowych Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, dofinansowanego z programu „Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki” Ministra Edukacji i Nauki na podstawie umowy SONB/SP/512497/2021.Przez prawie 5 wieków państwa afrykańskie były podporządkowane europejskim mocarstwom. W ten sposób ich rozwój (bądź jego brak) był uzależniony od decyzji gospodarczych państw-kolonizatorów. Sytuacja ludności afrykańskiej zaczęła się zmieniać już od końca II wojny światowej. Jednak dopiero pod koniec XX wieku, wraz z postępującą globalną zmianą sił gospodarczo-politycznych, Afryka
otrzymała szansę na rozwój. To wówczas przestała być postrzegana jedynie przez pryzmat surowców. Globalna ekspansja gospodarcza Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej przebiega wielokierunkowo i wieloetapowo. Partia rządząca aktywnie wspiera działania rodzimych przedsiębiorców na nowych rynkach. Obecnie intensyfikowane są działania w Ameryce Południowej i w Afryce. Ten drugi kontynent ze względu na swoje zaszłości historyczne i wysoką konfliktowość wymaga dużo większego zaangażowania, którego nie brakuje azjatyckim przedsiębiorcom. Artykuł przedstawia relacje, jakie zachodzą między BRlCS a wybranymi państwami afrykańskimi ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej i jej oddziaływania na lokalne gospodarki. Poza dogłębną analizą przyczyn bieżącej sytuacji Afryki, uwaga zostaje skupiona na potencjale, jakim dysponują poszczególne państwa. Kolejny fragment opracowania przedstawia relacje, jakie formują Chińczycy z afrykańskimi partnerami, stopień zależności i przewagi. Tutaj również zwrócono uwagę na Republikę Południowej Afryki - członka BRlCS - jako lidera wzrostu i rozwoju. Jest to jedno z niewielu państw o tak wysokim poziomie przemian politycznych, gospodarczych i społecznych, które od 1994 roku bardzo szybko rozwija się przy udziale lokalnych sił. Ocenie zostaje poddana współpraca między oboma podmiotami ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem wzajemnych relacji i ich poziomu. Artykuł nie pomija także zagadnień o skomplikowanym charakterze, wskazując zarówno pozytywne, jak i negatywne oddziaływanie nowych mocarstw światowych - BRlCS. Podstawowym celem jest jednak uzasadnienie tak dużego zaangażowania Chin w Afryce i próba oceny bieżących efektów rosnących zależności.For nearly five centuries, the countries of Africa were under European colonial rule. Thus their development (or lack thereof) was directly dependent on the decisions of the colonist governments. The situation of the African population began to change at the end of the Second World War. But it was not until the last decades of the 20th century, with the shift in global economic and political power, that Africa received a development opportunity. It was then that the continent ceased to be regarded solely as a provider of raw materiaIs. The global expansion of the People's Republic of China has been a multi-directional and multistage process. The ruling party actively supports the operations of Chinese entrepreneurs in new markets. At present, China is intensifying its activity in South America and Africa. The latter location, owing to the historical legacy and high likelihood of conflict, requires far greater commitment, which Chinese business persons have in abundance. The present paper discusses the relationships among the BRlCS states and selected countries of Africa, with particular attention to the People's Republic of China and its impact on African economies. Apart from performing an in-depth analysis of the continent"s current situation, the author discusses the potential of individual African countries. The paper also provides a description of the relations between the Chinese and African partners, the degree of dependence of the latter and the advantages of the former. Special attention is paid to the RSA - one of the BRlCS countries - as a leader in growth and development. It is one of the few countries of such dynamic political, economic and social change. Since 1994, the RSA has been rapidly developing, thanks to the efforts of its citizens. The author makes an assessment of the co-operation between the two partners, with special attention to the mutual relationship and its intensity. The paper also tackIes some complex issues, indicating both the positive and negative influence of
the BRlCS, new global powers. The author's main purpose is, however, to justify the deep involvement of China in Africa and to attempt an assessment of the current effects of the growing dependence.Wydział Ekonomii i Zarządzania Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.1994: Mandela becomes SA's first black president, bbc.co.uk, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/may/10/newsid _ 2661000/,
2661503.stm (data wejścia: 21 .11.2012).Agriculture: facts and trends, South Africa, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://awsassets.wwf.org.za/downloads/facts_brochure_mockup_04_ b.pdf (data wejścia: 6.01.2013).Aidoo R., ls Africa the next Asia?, diplomat.com, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://thediplomat.com/2012/04/06/is-africa-the-next-asia/ (data wejścia: 17.11.2012).Albrycht K., Południowa Afryka jednym z 20 najczęściej odwiedzanych miejsc, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.ttg.com.pl/ /index.php?mode=2&art=15653 (data
wejścia: 19.11.2012).Anyanzwa B., Barclays Bank completes deal to sell Africa operations, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/?articleID=2000072297 &story_title=
Kenya---Barclays-Bank-completes-deal-to-sell-Africa-operations (data wejścia: 7.01.2012).Bazy danych Global Finance - RPA, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu:
http://www.gfinag.com/gdp-data-country-reports/176-south-africa-gdp-country-report.html#axzz2BsDF4Qa8 (data wejścia: 19.11.2012).Bazy danych Global Finance - Szwecja, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.gfinag.com/gdp-data-country-reports/169-sweden-gdp-country-report.html (data wejścia: 19.11.2012).Boćkowski D., Chiński Smok na Czarnym Lądzie -początek nowej kolonizacji, czy szansa na wielki skok ?, [w:] Afryka w stosunkach międzynarodowych. Historia, stan obecny, perspektywy, B. Ndiate, P. Letko (red.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego w Olsztynie, Olsztyn 2010.Cejrowski W., Boso przez świat - Afryka Zachodnia, DVD, Producent: TVP, Warszawa 2008.China praised for Africans links, BBC.co.uk, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/africa/8301826.stm (data wejścia: 3.12.2012).Chołaszczyński K., Afrykański model autorytaryzmu - Zimbabwe Roberta Mugabe, [w:] Historia i Polityka, P. Tomaszewski (red.), Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja
Kopernika, Toruń 2010.Cornelissen S., Taylor I., The political economy of China and Japans relationship with Africa: a comparative perspective, "The Pacific Review" 2000, vol. 13, issue 4.Davidson B., Czarna matka, Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, Warszawa 1963.Dobosiewicz Z., Kraje rozwijające się we współczesnej gospodarce światowej, Wydawnictwo Książka i Wiedza, Warszawa 1976.Durham D. A., Duma Kartaginy, Wydawnictwo REBIS, Poznań 2006.Dziekan M. M., Cywilizacja islamu w Azji i Afryce, Wydawnictwo Książka i Wiedza, Warszawa 2007.Falkowski J., Geografia rolnictwa świata, PWN, Warszawa 2001.Gomes A. M., Sprawozdanie w sprawie polityki Chin i jej wpływu na Afrykę, dokument elektroniczny Komisji Rozwoju Parlamentu Europejskiego, tryb dostępu:
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef-=-IEPITEXT +REPORT +A6-2008-0080+0+DOC+XML+VO/IPL (data wejścia: 8.01.2012).Holmes J. R., "Soft Power " At Sea: Zheng He and china 's maritime diplomacy, University of Georgia, Center for international trade and security, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.uky.edu/Centers/Asia/SECAAS/Seras/2006/Holmes.htm (data wejścia: 19.11.2012).II Chińsko-Afrykańskie think tankowe forum w Etiopii, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.pcsa.org.pl/products/afryka%3A-chiny-chc%C4%85-pokoju-w-afryce/
(data wejścia: 28.11.2012).Jacques E., South Africa, [w:] Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, J. M. Smits, E. E. Cheltenham (red.), UK - Northampton, USA - Massachusetts, 2006.Jacq Ch., Sekrety Egiptu faraonów, Wydawnictwo Świat Książki, Warszawa 2006.Junbo J., China in Africa: From capitalism to colonialism, ,,AsiaTimes Online", dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/lA05Ad01.htrnl (data
wejścia: 8.01.2012).Kolany K., Strajki w RPA windują cenę platyny, bankier.pl, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.bankier.pl/wiadomosc/Strajki-w-RPA-winduja-cene-platyny-2617054.html (data wejścia: 5.11.2012).Kolasiński T. W., Zarządzanie postkolonialne. Otoczenie biznesu w Afryce subsaharyjskiej, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2011.Konarski M., Afryko-Islam: Ekspansja islamu w Afryce - parawan czy cywilizacyjny podbój?, psz.pl, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.psz.pl/tekst-7238/Afryka-Islam-Ekspansja-islamu-w-Afryce-parawan-czy-cywilizacyjny-podboj/Str-3 (data wejścia: 18.11.2012).Kopiński D., Empowerment or enclavement? Chinese investments in Africa, [w:] Crucial Problems of International Relations through the Eyes of Young Scholars, J. Masaryk (red.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Pradze, Praga 2010.Kosidło A., Dekolonizacja - najważniejsze wydarzenie w dziejach XX wieku, [w:] Czas XX wieku - nie tylko w polskiej perspektywie, R. Wapiński (red.), Prace Zakładu Historii Myśli Politycznej XIX i XX w., Instytutu Historii UG, Zbiór Studiów, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk 2000.Łoś R., Reginia-Zacharski J., Współczesne konflikty zbrojne, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2010.Makowski J., Geografia regionalna świata: Wielkie regiony, PWN, Warszawa 2006.Mobius M., Chiny w Afryce, forbes.pl, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.forbes.pl/artykuly/sekcje/oko-na-swiatlchiny-w-afryce. 16737,2 (data wejścia: 16.11.2012).National Association of Automotive Manufactures of South Africa, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.naamsa.co.za/ (data wejścia: 11.11.20l 2).Nest M., Coltan, Polity Press, Cambridge 2011.Oficjalna strona Ambasady RP w Pretorii (RPA), dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://pretoria.mfa.gov.pl (data wejścia: 18.11.2012).Oficjalna strona chińskiej ambasady w RPA, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.chinese-embassy.org.za/eng/zfgxss/zxjw/t953360.htm (data wejścia: 17.11.2012).Oficjalna strona Forum Współpracy Chińsko-Afrykańskiej, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: www.focac.org (data wejścia: 20.11.2012).Oficjalna strona Katedry Lingwistyki na Uniwersytecie w Manoa, University of Havaii, Honolulu, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: www.ling.hawaii.edu!language (data wejścia: 2.11.2012).Oficjalna strona Ministerstwa Rozwoju Gospodarczego RPA, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.economic.gov.za (data wejścia: 19.11.2012).Oficjalna strona People's Bank of China, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.pbc.gov.cn (data wejścia: 17.11.20 12).Oficjalna strona Światowej Organizacji Zdrowia, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: www.who.int (data wejścia: 10.11.2012).Oneil J., It 's time for Africa, "Oxford Economics", 2011, Ernst&Young' s, Africa attractiveness survey, Oxford 2011.Ostaszewski P., Konflikty kolonialne i postkolonialne w Afryce i Azji 1869-2006, Wydawnictwo Książka i Wiedza, Warszawa 2006.Ponte S., Roberts S., Sittert L., Black Economic Empowerment, Business and the State in South Africa, ,,Deve1opment and Change" 2007, vol. 38, Published by International Institute of Social Studies, Haga.Przewodnik eksportera po rynku Południowej Afryki, Ministerstwo Gospodarki RP, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.kig.pl/files/Znajdz%20zagranicznego
%20partnera/rpa.pdf (data wejścia: 2.11.2012).Przybylski J., ,,Dobra cena " nie tylko dla poliglotów, RP.pl, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.rp.pl/artykul/936683.html?print=tak&p=0 (data wejścia: 6.01.2012).Raport ONZ: Assessing Progress in Africa toward the Millennium Development Goals, MDG Report 2011, UNDP, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://web.undp.orgl/africa/mdg/report.pdf (data wejścia: 18.11.2012).Report: World Population 2010 Data Sheet, Population Reference Bureau, Waszyngton 2010.Shimbun A., China rapidly expanding its presence in Africa, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/asia/china/AJ201207190100 (data wejścia: 7.01.2012).Sienkiewicz H., W pustyni i w puszczy, Wydawnictwo GREG, Kraków 2009.South Africa Unemployment Rate, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/south-africa/unemployment-rate (data wejścia 5.01.2012).Statystyki CIA, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/ (data wejścia: 11.11.2012).Statystyki IMF, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: www.imf.org/extemal/data.htm (data wejścia: 11.11.2012).Stefanicki R., Afryka czeka na zieloną rewolucję, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://wyborcza.biz/biznes/2029020.101562. 12793615.html (data wejścia: 10.11.2012).Thompson D., China 's soft power in Africa: From the "Beijing consensus " to health diplomacy, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu: http://www.jamestown.org/single/
?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=3901 (data wejścia: 8.01.2012).Waligóra K., Kraje BRIC potęgi gospodarcze XXI wieku, [w:] Ekonomia - Polityka - Etyka, A. F. Bocian (red.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, Białystok 2011.Waligóra K., Światowy kryzys gospodarczy początku XXI wieku - "New Deal" wg BRICS, [w:] Globalizacja - Polityka - Etyka, A. F. Bocian (red.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, Białystok 2012.Winiecki J., Nowe kolory czarnej Afryki, ,,Polityka" 2010, nr 13 (2749).World Investment Report 2012, United Nations, Genewa 2012.Ziółkowski B., Konflikty zbrojne we współczesnej Afryce. Stan obecny na tle historycznym, Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, Toruń 2003.Zwoliński A., Afryka nieznana Europie, Angelus.pl, dokument elektroniczny, tryb dostępu:
http://angelus.pl/index.php?option=com_content&view=artic1e&id=6886:afiyka-nieznana-europie-ks-andrzej-zwoli&catid=596:historia-varia<emid=816 (data wejścia: 2.11.2012).313816
