323,235 research outputs found

    New pathways in pilgrimage studies: Interview with John Eade

    No full text
    Nové cesty v štúdiách pútí: rozhovor s Johnom Eadeom. John Eade je profesorom sociológie a antropológie na Univerzite v Roehamptone, hosťujúcim profesorom na Katedre pre štúdium náboženstva Univerzity v Toronte, členom Výskumnej jednotky migrácie na UCL a spoluzakladateľom a spolueditorom publikácií Routledge Studies in Pilgrimage, Religious Travel and Tourism a Bloomsbury Religion, Space & Place Series. Je tiež bývalým výkonným riaditeľom CRONEM (Centrum pre výskum nacionalizmu, etnicity a multikulturalizmu).John Eade is Professor of Sociology and Anthropology at the University of Roehampton, Visiting Professor at the Department for the Study of Religion, Toronto University, a member of the Migration Research Unit at UCL and co-founder and co-editor of Routledge Studies in Pilgrimage, Religious Travel and Tourism and the Bloomsbury Religion, Space & Place Series. He is also the former Executive Director of CRONEM (Centre for Research on Nationalism, Ethnicity and Multiculturalism).

    Diffusive author(s), cohesive author: Analysis of S/N (1994)

    No full text
    This study indicates the ways in which various aspects of the author(s) are brought forth in Dumb type’s performance art, the S/N production. Previous research has suggested a non-hierarchical organization of Dumb type and the absence of a “privileged author” in Dumb type’s collaborative work, S/N. However, the results that I have investigated from member’s interviews on the creative process of S/N along with my analysis of the recorded images of S/N, indicate a different aspect of the author(s). First, S/N was created through, so to speak, the collective ideas of the members of Dumb type. Further, S/N has at least nine quotations from previous performances, installations, and printed writings, besides the work-in-progress technique. Explicating one of the “author functions” as given by Michel Foucault, each text has plural subjects of the author. However, it has been revealed from members’ interviews that Teiji Furuhashi had a decision-making role in selecting the members’ ideas within the performance. Since then, S/N has had plural subjects of creation; however, Furuhashi is one of the subjects of creation along with the “privileged author.” S/N has plural authors (diffusive authors) yet at the same time, it has a “privileged author,” Teiji Furuhashi (cohesive author)

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Innate cell infiltration during acute TNBS colitis alters enteric nerve activity

    No full text
    Sa1687Melissa Campaniello, Chris Mavrangelos, david dimasi, Benjamin Hofma, Sam Eade, Scott Smid, Claudine Bonder, Elizabeth Beckett, Patrick A. Hughe

    Acute colitis chronically alters immune infiltration mechanisms and sensory neuro-immune interactions.

    No full text
    Abstract not availableMelissa A. Campaniello, Chris Mavrangelos, Samuel Eade, Andrea M. Harrington, L. Ashley Blackshaw, Stuart M. Brierley, Scott D. Smid, Patrick A. Hughe

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    No full text
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore