1,720,956 research outputs found
PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SAINS PESERTA DIDIK DI SEKOLAH DASAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF
Get PDFTujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui: apakah ada perbedaan hasil belajar sains peserta didik antara model pembelajaran experiential dengan model pembelajaran inquiry terbimbing; Apakah ada perbedaan hasil belajar sains peserta didik yang memiliki gaya kognitif field independent (FI) dengan gaya kognitif field dependent (FD); Apakah terdapat pengaruh interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan gaya kognitif terhadap hasil belajar sains peserta didik. Mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan hasil belajar sains antara model pembelajaran inquiry terbimbing dengan model pembelajaran experiential peserta didik yang memiliki gaya kognitif FD; Apakah ada perbedaan hasil belajar sains model pembelajaran experiential dengan model pembelajaran inquiry terbimbing peserta didik yang memiliki gaya kognitif FI. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode quasi experiment dengan simple random sampling, desain penelitian treatment by level 2x2, pengolah data berbantukan software SPSS versi 27. Penelitian dilakukan di SD Negeri 13 Sembawa, Kabupaten Banyuasin, dengan kelas kontrol dengan model pembelajaran inquiry terbimbing dan kelas eksperimen dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran experiential. Hasil penelitian diperoleh bahwa: (1) Hasil belajar sains peserta didik pada Model pembelajaran experiential lebih tinggi dari model pembelajaran inquiry terbimbing, terbukti dengan nilai Sig. (2-tailed) 0.421 > 0.05. (2) Hasil belajar sains peserta didik dengan gaya kognitif FI lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar peserta didik yang memiliki gaya kognitif FD, terbukti dengan nilai Sig. (2-tailed) 0.430 > 0.05. dan (3) Tidak ada hubungan interaksi model pembelajaran dan gaya kognitif terhadap hasil belajar sains peserta didik. (4). Hasil Belajar Sains antara model pembelajaran experiential lebih tinggi dari model pembelajaran inquiry terbimbing bagi peserta didik yang memiliki gaya kognitif FD, terbukti dengan nilai Sig. (2-tailed) 0.157 > 0.05. (5) Hasil belajar sains model pembelajaran experiential lebih tinggi dari model pembelajaran inquiry terbimbing peserta didik yang memiliki gaya kognitif FI, terbukti bahwa nilai Sig.(2-tailed) 0.430 > 0.05. Berdasarkan penelitian yang telah dilakukan dan hasil analisis data serta pembahasan di atas, maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa: Hasil belajar sains peserta didik yang menggunakan model pembelajaran experiential lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar menggunakan model pembelajaran inquiry terbimbing. Hasil belajar sains peserta didik dengan gaya kognitif FI lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar peserta didik gaya kognitif FD. Dengan demikian model pembelajaran bersama-sama dengan gaya kognitif dapat mempengaruhi hasil belajar.
The purpose of this study was to find out: are there differences in students' science learning outcomes between the experiential learning model and the guided inquiry learning model; is there a difference in science learning outcomes between students who have a field-independent cognitive style (FI) and a field-dependent cognitive style (FD); and is there an interaction between the learning model and cognitive style on students' science learning outcomes? Knowing whether there are differences in science learning outcomes between the guided inquiry learning model and the experiential learning model of students who have the FD cognitive style, are there differences in science learning outcomes between the experiential learning model and the guided inquiry learning model of students who have the FI cognitive style? The method used is a quasi-experimental method with simple random sampling, treatment by level 2x2 research design, and data processing with the help of SPSS software version 27. The research was conducted at SD Negeri 13 Sembawa, Banyuasin Regency, control class with a guided inquiry learning model and experimental class using the experiential learning model. The results of the study showed that: (1) The science learning outcomes of students in the experiential learning model were higher than the guided inquiry learning model, as evidenced by the Sig. (2-tailed) 0.421 > 0.05. (2) The learning outcomes of students with the FI cognitive style are higher than the learning outcomes of students who have the FD cognitive style, as evidenced by the sig. (2-tailed) 0.430 > 0.05. and (3) there is no interaction of learning models and cognitive styles on students' science learning outcomes. (4). Science learning outcomes in the experiential learning model are higher than those in the guided inquiry learning model for students who have the FD cognitive style, as evidenced by the sig. (2-tailed) 0.157 > 0.05. (5) The science learning outcomes of the experiential learning model are higher than the guided inquiry learning model of students who have the FI cognitive style; it is proven that the value of Sig. (2-tailed) 0.430 > 0.05. Based on the research that has been done and the results of the data analysis and discussion above, it can be concluded that the science learning outcomes of students who use the experiential learning model are higher than the learning outcomes using the guided inquiry learning model. The science learning outcomes of students with the FI cognitive style are higher than the learning outcomes of FD cognitive style students. Thus, the learning model, together with the cognitive style, can affect learning outcomes
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Author Under Sail The Imagination of Jack London, 1893-1902
No full textIn Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Intro -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. Spirit Truth -- 2. From Absorption to Theatricality and Back Again -- 3. "I Will Build a New Present" -- 4. Sons as Authors -- 5. Fathers as Publishers -- 6. The Daughter as Author -- 7. Lovers as Authors -- 8. At Sea with the Family -- 9. Yellow News, Yellow Stories -- 10. The Return Home -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index -- About Jay WilliamsIn Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, YYYY. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries
- …
