1,720,976 research outputs found
ECEMF Diagnostic Scenarios, version 1.0
No full textThis dataset compiles diagnostic scenarios from several Integrated Assessment Models (IAM) and Energy System Models (ESM) to facilitate systematic comparison of a broad range of results across these models.
These diagnostic scenarios were developed in the Horizon 2020 project ECEMF (https://ecemf.eu).
Visit the ECEMF Scenario Explorer hosted by IIASA at https://data.ece.iiasa.ac.at/ecemf for more information and interactive user interface to work with the scenario data
Model Comparison Protocol
No full textProtocol for model comparison exercise in the Horizon-2020 project European Climate and Energy Modelling Forum (ECEMF), including the variable list used in the diagnostic exercise
Scenario Protocol EU in the global context
No full text<p>Protocol for scenario exercise on trade barriers between EU and non-EU regions, in the Horizon-2020 project European Climate and Energy Modelling Forum (ECEMF).</p><p><span>The project European Climate and Energy Modeling Forum (ECEMF) aims to inform the development of future energy and climate policies at national and European levels. Part of the focus lies on model comparison, shedding light on potential uncertainties and building a scientific community, while other parts of the project focus on assessing pathways to climate neutrality and the Paris Agreement (PA). Work package 5 investigates how EU climate and energy policy is interlinked in the global context and in the context of meeting the PA goals. The first task (T5.1) aims to do so by developing PA-achieving pathways utilizing harmonized assumptions on technology costs, impacts on trade, energy markets and technology transfer – aspects that are clearly linked with non-EU economies, visualizing aspects of European climate policy in an international context. Closely linked to T5.1, the second task (T5.2) investigates a central topic of international climate policy – carbon budgets consistent with PA goals – with novel focus on uncertainties associated with budgets, climate feedbacks and effort-sharing principles both globally as well as among member states within the EU.</span></p>
OSeMOSYS/osemosys2iamc: OSeMOSYS to IAMC
No full textThis v0.1 release implements the functionality to convert from OSeMOSYS results to the IAMC Template.
This package was developed with the ECEMF project (Horizon 2020 Grant 101022622) to participate with the OSeMBE model in a model comparison exercise described in the ECEMF Model Comparison Protocol
ECEMF Policy Brief: Insights on EU2040 targets based on a model intercomparison exercise of EU Climate Neutrality Pathways
No full textA policy brief describing the findings of the first round of ECEMF Climate Neutrality Pathway model intercomparison exercise.
It presents insights on 2040 emission reductions in line with reaching climate neutrality by 2050, and describes the changes to the energy system behind those emission reductions.
These scenarios were developed in the Horizon 2020 project ECEMF (https://ecemf.eu)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
