152 research outputs found
La lode e il biasimo nella «Storia» di De Sanctis
No full textThe paper analyzes the language and style of De Sanctis’ value judgements
in his Storia della letteratura italiana, with particular focus on the deep tonal
swings and on his characteristic use of technical words with a positive or
negative connotation. The paper then focuses on a stylistical analysis of De
Sanctis’ forceful critique of Marino’s work. This analysis will reveal the critic’s
constant effort to abide by a fair code of judgement, even when dealing
with an author such as Marino, whose style is utterly incompatible with De
Sanctis’ aesthetic beliefs
De Sanctis e la storiografia letteraria italiana
No full textL'autore analizzza l'impatto della «Storia della letteratura italiana» di Francesco De Sanctis sulla storiografia italiana del xx secolo, rilevando come la linea storicistica «lineare» di De Sanctis sia stata assunta come modello storiografico di tutte le Storie letterarie successive ma come nel contempo sia stata oggetto anche di una riduzione ideologica, da Croce a Gentile, a Gramsci, con la sottolineatura degli aspetti «militanti» della sua opera. De Sanctis ha concepito la sua «Storia» in funzione del processo unitario risorgimentale: soltanto Carlo Dionisotti ha criticato le ragioni storiche di tale modello proponendone acutamente uno radicalmente alternativo, di tipo geografico-storico,che recentemente ha iniziato a produrre i suoi risultati, anche a livello formativo.The author analyses the impact of the «Storia della letteratura italiana» by Francesco De Sanctis about the Italian historiography of the Twentieth century, pointing out how the historicist line by De Sanctis has established itself as a historiographical model for the whole later literary history while, at the same time, it proposes an ideological reduction, from Croce and Gentile, to Gramsci, with the underlining of the «militant» aspects of his work. De Sanctis has conceived his «Storia» in relationship with the unitary process of the Risorgimento: only Carlo Dionisotti has criticised the historical reasons of such a model, and has aptly proposed a radical alternative one of a historical-geographical type. This alternative has recently begun to achieve results at a formative level
Recommended from our members
Francesco De Sanctis interprete del Rinascimento
No full textThe critics are fairly unanimous in recognizing that De Sanctis had an overall negative judgement of Renaissance. In this essay I propose to reconsider such a common interpretation in the light of the studies De Sanctis made during his exile in Switzerland, examining in particular the attention dedicated to the Republican Machiavelli and the influence that the widespread Swiss Republican culture had on his thought. I will also prove that De Sanctis proposes a bifocal idea of the concept of Renaissance, as it emerges in particular from his Storia della letteratura italiana, presenting an interpretative ambivalence that cannot be reduced to a mere negative evaluation. It is actually necessary to examine the re-evaluation that the author proposes of the philosophical and scientific thought of the main protagonists of modernity, and in particular of Machiavelli
De Sanctis e la storiografia letteraria italiana
No full textL'autore analizzza l'impatto della «Storia della letteratura italiana» di Francesco De Sanctis sulla storiografia italiana del xx secolo, rilevando come la linea storicistica «lineare» di De Sanctis sia stata assunta come modello storiografico di tutte le Storie letterarie successive ma come nel contempo sia stata oggetto anche di una riduzione ideologica, da Croce a Gentile, a Gramsci, con la sottolineatura degli aspetti «militanti» della sua opera. De San ctis ha concepito la sua «Storia» in funzione del processo unitario risorgimentale: soltanto Carlo Dionisotti ha criticato le ragioni storiche di tale modello proponendone acutamente uno radicalmente alternativo, di tipo geografico-storico,che recentemente ha iniziato a produrre i suoi risultati, anche a livello formativo.The author analyses the impact of the «Storia della letteratura italiana» by Francesco De Sanctis about the Italian historiography of the Twentieth century, pointing out how the his toricist line by De Sanctis has established itself as a historiographical model for the whole later literary history while, at the same time, it proposes an ideological reduction, from Croce and Gentile, to Gramsci, with the underlining of the «militant» aspects of his work. De Sanctis has conceived his «Storia» in relationship with the unitary process of the Risorgimento: only Carlo Dionisotti has criticised the historical reasons of such a model, and has aptly proposed a radical alternative one of a historical-geographical type. This alternative has recently begun to achieve results at a formative level
Rivisitazioni. Francesco De Sanctis, Storia della letteratura italiana
No full textIl contributo verifica la presenza di un impianto ideale simile a quello che anima la Storia della letteratura italiana di Francesco De Sanctis nella storiografia letteraria coeva, ed esamina l’influenza esercitata su quella successiva dal paradigma morale di cui quest’opera è portatrice. Si sofferma sulla “classicità” dell’opera, sugli aspetti "romanzeschi" della scrittura desanctisiana, sulla presenza dell’idea di policentrismo, su
alcuni modelli e schemi presenti nel giudizio critico di De Sanctis, quali il
gradiente di realismo degli autori e il loro ruolo di precorritori dell’idea nazionale e dell’unità.The author analyzes the presence in coeval literary historiography of an ideal structure similar to the Storia della letteratura italiana by Francesco De Sanctis, examining the
influence of its moral paradigm on later historiography. He dwells upon the “classicism” of the work, the novelistic aspects of the story writing, the problem of the national unity and the presence of the idea of polycentrism, some models and schemes used by De Sanctis to evaluate the authors, such as their level of realism and their role as forerunners of the idea of nation and of the unity
L'umanesimo meridionale nelle pagine di De Sanctis, Settembrini, Torraca
No full textIl saggio ripercorre le pagine dedicate all’Umanesimo meridionale di De Sanctis, Settembrini e Torraca, rispettivamente nella Storia della letteratura italiana, nelle Lezioni e nei diversi saggi sul Quattrocento partenopeo. Soprattutto il Settembrini mira a sottolineare l’importanza di una letteratura napoletana, volgare e insieme latina, che è capace di rivaleggiare con quella toscana: gli autori sono il Pontano e il Sannazaro, come pure Masuccio Salernitano autore di quel Novellino di cui il critico e patriota realizza una prima edizione critica. Dal canto suo Torraca si pone sulla scia dei maestri, appunto Settembrini e De Sanctis, contribuendo a rinnovare la lettura dell’Arcadia e a collocare il Sannazaro all’interno di un panorama non più solo italiano, ma europeo.The essay retraces the pages dedicated to Southern Humanism by De Sanctis, Settembrini and Torraca, respectively, in Storia della letteratura italiana, in Lezioni and in the essays on the Neapolitan Fifteenth century. Settembrini emphasizes the importance of a Neapolitan literature, both in the vernacular and in Latin, which is capable of being at the same level as Tuscan literature: the authors are Pontano and Sannazaro, as well as Masuccio Salernitano, author of Novellino of which the critic and patriot makes a first critical edition. Torraca follows the masters Settembrini and De Sanctis, affirming their interpretation of Arcadia and placing Sannazaro within both an Italian and European panorama
Filippo Maria De Sanctis e l’educazione cinematografica. Marxismo, educazione permanente, contrastività
No full textThe works of Filippo Maria De Sanctis (1926-1989) on film education represent an original contribution in the landscape of media pedagogy, Marxist and other-wise, of the 1960s and 1970s. The article first outlines the main leans in screen education of the time, before it reconstructs De Sanctis’ contribution in this area, connecting it to the other core topic of his work (for which he is best remembered today): lifelong learning. In doing so, the article focuses on the method of post-film discussion, used in the context of both film clubs and schools. Criti-cally analyzing De Sanctis’ media pedagogy, the article reveals, beyond the orig-inality of the author, interesting insights regarding the historical evolution of the field, such as the problematic theorization of the inoculation/protectionist model, and the end of the orientation aimed at the aesthetic development of the human subject
Filippo Maria De Sanctis e l’educazione cinematografica. Marxismo, educazione permanente, contrastività
No full textThe works of Filippo Maria De Sanctis (1926-1989) on film education represent an original contribution in the landscape of media pedagogy, Marxist and other-wise, of the 1960s and 1970s. The article first outlines the main leans in screen education of the time, before it reconstructs De Sanctis’ contribution in this area, connecting it to the other core topic of his work (for which he is best remembered today): lifelong learning. In doing so, the article focuses on the method of post-film discussion, used in the context of both film clubs and schools. Criti-cally analyzing De Sanctis’ media pedagogy, the article reveals, beyond the orig-inality of the author, interesting insights regarding the historical evolution of the field, such as the problematic theorization of the inoculation/protectionist model, and the end of the orientation aimed at the aesthetic development of the human subject
Il socialismo morale di Aldo Capitini (1918-1948)
No full textThis monograph is focused on the reconstruction of the socialism of Aldo Capitini (1899-1968). As the author shows, Capitini’s socialism is a very atypical one. It stems from an attempt to overcome that cultural, philosophical and religious crisis which culminates in the First World War and that is due to the end of the faith in progress. Therefore, Capitini’s socialism is peculiarly nourished by a religious perspective which cannot be reduced to Catholicism, nor to any other version of the reformed Christian churches existing in Europe. In a similar way, Capitini’s socialism rejects all those ideologies, such as communism and liberalism, which are based on the assumption that history is led by progress. Capitini’s socialism underlines the importance of individual responsibility seen as a fundamental crossroads able to promote change and revolution in a world which has become indifferent to any metaphysical reference to progress. Lots of manuscripts and unpublished materials have been consulted with a view both to uncovering the sources of Capitini’s socialism and to finding an answer to some theoretical knots, such as that – which Norberto Bobbio himself did not manage to solve in a satisfactory way - of the relationship between this kind of socialism and the institutional framework. According to this reconstruction, Capitini's socialism favours some form of integration between its moral and religious inspiration and the state
Fundaciòn y desarrollo de la neuropsiquiatrìa infantil en un estudio historiogràfico de la obra de Sante De Sanctis y Lanfranco Ciampi (parte I: Sante De Sanctis)
No full textThis paper aims to make a historiographical study about the foundation and development of the Italian child neuropsychiatry through the work of Sante De Sanctis by a systematized survey of documentary sources and its treatment with qualitative techniques of critical discourse analysis. Some aspects of his work were investigated, such as the study of dreams; and the impact of his research was measuredin the context of local production and the scope at the international level. Likewise, this study searches for traces of his hard work disciple —Lanfranco Ciampi— in Rosario (Argentina), who devoted his life to the social adaptation of the mentally ill child. The first hypothesis that guides this research argues that the most studied facts of the work of De Sanctis, his contributions to the Child Neuropsychiatry did not reflect the prolific spirit of the author. The second hypothesis, derived from the previous one, states that the pluralistic approach of the studies of De Sanctis about the psychophysical reality of man allowed him to achieve worldwide recognition of doctors, psychiatrists and psychologists. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved)
- …
