130,368 research outputs found
Dual graph polynomials and a 4-face formula
We study the dual graph polynomials and the case when a Feynman graph has notriangles but has a 4-face. This leads to the proof of the duality-admissibility of all graphs up to 18 loops. As a consequence, the invariant is the same for all 4 Feynman period representations (position,momentum, parametric and dual parametric) for any physically relevant graph.<br
On B-type Open–Closed Landau–Ginzburg Theories Defined on Calabi–Yau Stein Manifolds
We consider the bulk algebra and topological D-brane category arising from the differential model of the open–closed B-type topological Landau–Ginzburg theory defined by a pair (X,W), where X is a non-compact Calabi–Yau manifold and W is a complex-valued holomorphic function. When X is a Stein manifold (but not restricted to be a domain of holomorphy), we extract equivalent descriptions of the bulk algebra and of the category of topological D-branes which are constructed using only the analytic space associated to X. In particular, we show that the D-brane category is described by projective factorizations defined over the ring of holomorphic functions of X. We also discuss simplifications of the analytic models which arise when X is holomorphically parallelizable and illustrate these in a few classes of examples. © 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Natur
© The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018111Nsciescopu
Non-degeneracy of Cohomological Traces for General Landau-Ginzburg Models
We prove non-degeneracy of the cohomological bulk and boundary traces for general open-closed Landau-Ginzburg models associated to a pair (X, W), where X is a non-compact complex manifold with trivial canonical line bundle and W is a complex-valued holomorphic function defined on X, assuming only that the critical locus of W is compact (but may not consist of isolated points). These results can be viewed as certain "deformed" versions of Serre duality. The first amounts to a duality property for the hypercohomology of the sheaf Koszul complex of W, while the second is equivalent with the statement that a certain power of the shift functor is a Serre functor on the even subcategory of the Z(2)-graded category of topological D-branes of such models.11Nsciescopu
MeSH term explosion and author rank improve expert recommendations
Information overload is an often-cited phenomenon that reduces the productivity, efficiency and efficacy of scientists. One challenge for scientists is to find appropriate collaborators in their research. The literature describes various solutions to the problem of expertise location, but most current approaches do not appear to be very suitable for expert recommendations in biomedical research. In this study, we present the development and initial evaluation of a vector space model-based algorithm to calculate researcher similarity using four inputs: 1) MeSH terms of publications; 2) MeSH terms and author rank; 3) exploded MeSH terms; and 4) exploded MeSH terms and author rank. We developed and evaluated the algorithm using a data set of 17,525 authors and their 22,542 papers. On average, our algorithms correctly predicted 2.5 of the top 5/10 coauthors of individual scientists. Exploded MeSH and author rank outperformed all other algorithms in accuracy, followed closely by MeSH and author rank. Our results show that the accuracy of MeSH term-based matching can be enhanced with other metadata such as author rank
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Differential Models for B-Type Open–Closed Topological Landau–Ginzburg Theories
We propose a family of differential models for B-type open?closed topological Landau?Ginzburg theories defined by a pair (X,W), where X is any non-compact Calabi?Yau manifold and W is any holomorphic complex-valued function defined on X whose critical set is compact. The models are constructed at cochain level using smooth data, including the twisted Dolbeault algebra of polyvector-valued forms and a twisted Dolbeault category of holomorphic factorizations of W. We give explicit proposals for cochain level versions of the bulk and boundary traces and for the bulk-boundary and boundary-bulk maps of the Landau?Ginzburg theory.We prove that most of the axioms of an open?closed TFT (topological field theory) are satisfied on cohomology and conjecture that the remaining two axioms (namely non-degeneracy of bulk and boundary traces and the topological Cardy constraint) are also satisfied. – © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 201811Nsciescopu
"Closing the R&D Gap, Evaluating the Sources of R&D Spending"
Both spending and tax policies have been implemented in the United States with the goal of stimulating private sector research and development (R&D). Karier questions whether current R&D policy, especially the research and experimentation tax credit, can contribute to closing the gap between nondefense expenditures on R&D in the United States and such expenditures in other countries, such as Japan and Germany. He also explores possible changes to our current R&D policy to make it more effective.
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
