1,720,969 research outputs found
Surgically treated acute distal biceps tendon injuries: What results do they have in comparison with the contralateral healthy arm? A systematic review and meta-analysis
No full textBackground: Surgical repair of distal biceps tendon injury restores flexion and supination strength, resulting in good functional outcome. There are few studies that consider clinical results of the operated arm compared to the healthy contralateral arm, whereas there are many articles examining the results of different surgical techniques. We carried out a systematic review with meta-analysis of the studies that consider this comparison. The aim was to evaluate if there are significative differences in terms of functional results between the operated arm and the non-injured contralateral arm. In fact, we believe that this comparison is useful for assessing patient true satisfaction. Patients and methods: In accordance with the PRISMA and QUORUM statements, a comprehensive search on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify studies reporting comparative functional results of the operated arm with healthy contralateral arm from January 1985 until November 2022. Criteria for inclusion were acute complete injury of the distal biceps' tendon operated within 30days; range of motion (ROM), isokinetic and isometric strength measurements; minimum patients follow-up of 24months; studies written in English language. Then a DerSimonian and Laird meta-analysis was conducted to compare the functional outcomes of the operated arm to the non-injured arm. Results: Of the 588 initial studies, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria; methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A total of 272 surgically treated distal biceps ruptures were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was of 39.6months (24 to 72months). ROM flexion, pronation, and supination of the operated elbows were significantly decreased, with mean differences of -1.24̊ (p=0.004), -7.95̊ (p=0.003), and -9.27̊ (p=0.004) respectively, compared to the non-injured healthy elbows. The difference of ROM extension was not-statistically significant (+0.21̊; p=0.66). The Isokinetic data showed a statistically significant reduction in the flexion strength (-4.56Nm; p=0.0004) and a statistical significative reduction in the supination strength (-1.18 Nm; p=0.02) of the injured operated arm compared with the healthy one. The forest-plot table of the isometric data was not elaborated due to the small number of studies eligible for the meta-analysis. Discussion: This study represents the first systematic review and meta-analysis to compare functional and clinical outcomes following operative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures with the contralateral healthy arm. Significant differences in ROM flexion, supination, and pronation and in isokinetic and isometric data were found between the operated and non-operated unaffected arm, demonstrating that, as expected, the unaffected arm performed better than the operated one. However, the functional differences between the data of the operated and healthy arm were slight and lead us to overall consider surgery as good functional result. Levels of evidence: III
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Partial articular fractures of the radial head: how to understand them using computed tomography
No full textBackground: The optimal treatment for different types of displaced partial articular radial head fractures is still debatable. Fractures involving the articulating portion of the radial head can be defined also as bi-articular and are often underestimated. Moreover, the complete loss of periosteal contact between fracture fragments is a marker of instability. Available classifications do not emphasize these aspects. The purpose of the present study is to describe two assessment methods to identify fractures involving the articulating portion of the radial head and complete loss of periosteal contact with the help of 2D-3D CT scan. The second purpose is to propose a classification of the displaced partial articular radial head fractures basing on these two assessment methods. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that the proposed classification is reliable. Patients and methods: By observing the position of the bicipital tuberosity with respect to the ulna in reference to the coronal plane in the 3D-CT scan and by observing the location of the fracture fragment in the 2D axial scan, it is possible to understand if a displaced partial articular fracture involves the articulating portion of the radial head. Also, it is possible to understand the presence or absence of a complete loss of periosteal contact between the two fracture fragments by observing the coronal and sagittal 2D-CT scans. We identified 20 displaced partial articular radial head fractures on a series of 149 patients with radial head fractures. Following the above-described assessment methods, these 20 fractures were classified in three subgroups. Also, seven evaluators were asked to use these assessment methods to classify these 20 fractures in the three subgroups, in order to evaluate inter- and intra-observer agreement. Results: Eight fractures involved the non-articulating portion of the radial head with complete loss of periosteal contact, eight involved the non-articulating portion of the radial head without complete loss of periosteal contact, and four involved the articulating portion of the radial head with or without complete loss of periosteal contact. The kappa for intra-observer reliability ranged from 0.46 to 0.84. The average kappa for inter-observer reliability was 0.570 (range: 0.526 to 0.676). The Kendall's coefficient for inter-observer concordance was 0.673. Discussion: Prognostically, displaced partial fractures of the articulating portion of the radial head could differ from the other types, regardless of whether or not there is a complete loss of periosteal contact. Underestimating this fracture pattern can lead to poor results due to risk of forearm rotation blockage. Moreover, underestimating complete loss of periosteal contact in displaced partial fractures of the non-articulating portion of the radial head could lead to poor results. The described evaluation methods have moderate reliability, but can represent, along with other described methods, a good starting point to better understand and treat these insidious fractures. Level of evidence: III; retrospective study
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
