2 research outputs found
Doubting Donald: A Reply to Professor Donald Galloway\u27s \u27Critical Mistakes\u27
No full textIn a recent article Professor Galloway has argued that supporters of the Critical Legal Studies perspective make five fundamental errors in their analyses of liberal theory and as a result have failed in their deconstructive agenda. In this essay Professor Devlin replies to these criticisms and posits that Galloway\u27s essay in retrieval is itself subject to the very same errors of which he accuses the crits . Moreover, it is argued that the nature of Galloway \u27s partial defence of liberalism confirms rather than denies the accuracy of critical assessments
Recommended from our members
Doubting Donald: A Reply to Professor Donald Galloway\u27s \u27Critical Mistakes\u27
No full textIn a recent article Professor Galloway has argued that supporters of the Critical Legal Studies perspective make five fundamental errors in their analyses of liberal theory and as a result have failed in their deconstructive agenda. In this essay Professor Devlin replies to these criticisms and posits that Galloway\u27s essay in retrieval is itself subject to the very same errors of which he accuses the crits . Moreover, it is argued that the nature of Galloway \u27s partial defence of liberalism confirms rather than denies the accuracy of critical assessments
