1,721,007 research outputs found

    Control of fruit tree vigor induced by dwarfing rootstocks

    No full text
    Grafting of fruit trees has been practiced for more than two millennia, and dwarfing rootstocks have been used to control scion vigor for several centuries. The fact that most commercial temperate fruit trees are compound plants composed of two separate genotypes (the scion selected for fruit and shoot characteristics, and the rootstock selected for root characteristics) makes them interesting objects for studying root–shoot interactions in plants. The size-controlling effect of certain rootstocks in various fruit tree species is perhaps the most intriguing and commercially important example of how genetics of one part (the root) of compound plants can influence the behavior of the other part (the shoot). While there is no debate about the potential of rootstocks to affect the growth and productivity of the scion in compound fruit trees, there is no consensus on the physiological and/or anatomical mechanisms involved in the dwarfing phenomenon. Indeed, different hypotheses focusing on various aspects of plant function have been proposed to explain the dwarfing mechanism. This review discusses the concepts and the experimental support for six of the primary theories proposed to explain the dwarfing mechanism induced by rootstocks in fruit trees. These theories are based on the idea that dwarfing is caused by semi-incompatibility between the rootstock and scion or anatomical, morphological, or physiological characteristics of the rootstock or graft union that affect tree water relations, tree nutrition, scion–rootstock hormonal and metabolic signaling, carbohydrate storage and mobilization, and/or the relative abilities of the scion and rootstock components of the tree to compete for resources. Each of the proposed theories has received some experimentally based support in selected crops. Scion–rootstock semi-incompatibility is a general mechanism that may be involved in many scion–rootstock combinations and could cause responses that appear to involve the factors common to the other theories. None of the theories have been documented to be involved in all rootstock–scion combinations or to be solely responsible for the dwarfing response of scions associated with specific rootstocks. However, there is good evidence that changes in water relations are related to the dwarfing response in several species. In retrospect, it is perhaps unrealistic to think that any single one of these or other mechanisms could be solely responsible for orchestrating all of the complex interactions involved in rootstock-induced vigor reduction of the scion

    Yield in almond is related more to the abundance of flowers than the relative number of flowers that set fruit

    Get PDF
    Almond tree yield is a function of the number of flowers on a tree and the percentage of flowers that set fruit. Almonds are borne on spurs (short proleptic shoots that can have both leaves and flowers). Almond tree spur dynamics research has documented that previous year spur leaf area is a predictive parameter for year-to-year spur survival, spur flowering and to a lesser extent spur fruiting, while previous year fruit bearing has a negative impact on subsequent year flowering. However, a question remained about whether yields are more dependent on flower numbers or relative fruit set of the flowers that are present. The aim of the present work was to compare the importance of flower abundance with that of relative fruit set in determining the productivity of a population of tagged spurs in almond trees over a 6-year period. Overall tree yield among years was more sensitive to total number of flowers on a tree rather than relative fruit set. These results emphasize the importance of maintaining large populations of healthy flowering spurs for sustained high production in almond orchards

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Late-season nitrogen applications in high-latitude strawberry nurseries improve transplant production pattern in warm regions

    Get PDF
    The influence of late-season nitrogen (N) applications on the fruiting pattern of strawberry runner plants of ‘Camarosa’ was determined over three growing seasons. Experiments were carried out in high-latitude nurseries in northern California and fruit production trials were established in southern California. A total of 80 kg/ha of foliar nitrogen was delivered in three applications to the nursery in late summer. Late-season foliar nitrogen applications: (1) increased early yields (+22% on average) as well as the number of early marketable fruit, (2) did not affect total season yields, fruit size, appearance and firmness and (3) resulted in greater N concentration in leaves, crowns and roots. Runner plants with leaf N concentration within the sufficiency range (1.9 - 2.8% of dry mass) produced the highest early yields. Total nonstructural carbohydrate concentrations decreased in most of the N-treated plants. Apparently, nursery late-season foliar nitrogen applications enhance N mobilization to crown and root, stimulate plant activity during the period of flower differentiation after planting, accelerating flower development and contributing to the advancement of fruit production.EEA FamailláFil: Kirschbaum, Daniel Santiago. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Famaillá; ArgentinaFil: Larson, Kirk D. University of California Davis. Department of Plant Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Weinbaum, Steven A. University of California Davis. Department of Plant Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: DeJong, Theodore M. University of California Davis. Department of Plant Sciences; Estados Unido

    Unlocking the black box of plant biostimulants

    No full text
    Over the recent years, plant biostimulants have shifted from the margins of agricultural innovation to the forefront of global discussions towards sustainable crop production models. Despite their growing popularity and commercial relevance, key questions persist regarding their actual effects on plants, the validation of their claimed benefits, and the identification of reliable metrics to assess their impact. This editorial aspires to navigate through the definitions, scientific evidence, and regulatory frameworks shaping the current and future landscape of biostimulants. Building on this foundation, the present article reflects on the broader scientific discussion initiated during the ISHS HortForum on plant biostimulants, aiming to distil key conceptual and methodological challenges in the field. An integrated perspective on how biostimulants can be more effectively studied, functionally categorized, and applied in modern agriculture from a range of perspectives is discussed. This analysis provides a critical synthesis of current scientific thinking. It highlights key research priorities, particularly concerning mechanisms of action, quantifiable effects, and the role of biostimulants in promoting resilient, sustainable cropping systems

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore