1,721,635 research outputs found
Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction,Stroke,or Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease in the CHARISMA Trial
No full textSupplemental material for Thrombolytic therapy in older acute ischemic stroke patients with gastrointestinal malignancy or recent bleeding
No full textSupplemental Material for Thrombolytic therapy in older acute ischemic stroke patients with gastrointestinal malignancy or recent bleeding by Taku Inohara, Li Liang, Andrzej S Kosinski, Eric E Smith, Lee H Schwamm, Adrian F Hernandez, Deepak L Bhatt, Gregg C Fonarow, Eric D Peterson and Ying Xian in European Stroke Journal</p
SYMPLICITY HTN-3: failure at 6 months, success at 3 years?
No full textIn The Lancet, Deepak L Bhatt and colleagues report long-term outcomes of renal artery denervation in patients denervated by single-electrode radiofrequencywithin the SYMPLICITY HTN-3 study. [...
sj-docx-1-tab-10.1177_1759720X231201047 – Supplemental material for Rheumatoid arthritis disease activity and adverse events in patients receiving tofacitinib or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: a post hoc analysis of ORAL Surveillance
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-tab-10.1177_1759720X231201047 for Rheumatoid arthritis disease activity and adverse events in patients receiving tofacitinib or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: a post hoc analysis of ORAL Surveillance by George A. Karpouzas, Zoltán Szekanecz, Eva Baecklund, Ted R. Mikuls, Deepak L. Bhatt, Cunshan Wang, Gosford A. Sawyerr, Yan Chen, Sujatha Menon, Carol A. Connell, Steven R. Ytterberg and Mahta Mortezavi in Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease</p
Comparison of Author Productivity of Cancer Research Journal and Circulation Journal of 2013-2022 Using Lotka's Law
No full textThe purpose of this study was to compare author productivity and the conformity of the frequency distribution of author productivity in the Journal of Cancer Research and the Journal of Circulation. This research is comparative research using a quantitative approach. The research sample was determined by using the disproportionate stratified random sampling method. The results of productivity calculations using Lotka's Law show that the percentage of authors contributing to one article in the Journal of Cancer Research for the straight count method is 97.1%. At the same time, that in the Journal of Circulation is 94.6%. The percentage for the complete count and adjusted count methods in the Journal of Cancer Research is 90.3%, while that in the Journal of Circulation is 83.8%. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test results show a significant difference between the theoretical frequency distribution of Lotka's Law and the frequency distribution of article authors in the Journal of Cancer Research. This is indicated by the maximum deviation value (Dmaks) being more significant than the critical value at the real level of 0.05, namely precisely in the complete count and adjusted count methods with a Dmaks value of 0.0310 and a critical value of 0.0117. The study results show that by looking at the contribution of article authors, authors from the Journal of Circulation are more productive than those from the Journal of Cancer Research, with the highest article contribution being 28 articles by Deepak L. Bhatt from the Journal of Circulation. The conformity of the frequency distribution of author productivity in the Circulation Journal does fit Lotka's Law of author productivity. This is shown in the straight count, complete count, and adjusted count methods, while the Cancer Research Journal only fits in the straight count method.114 PagesSkripsi Sarjan
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Supplemental material 2 for Rationale, design, and baseline participant characteristics in the MRI and cognitive substudy of the cardiovascular outcomes for people using anticoagulation strategies trial
No full textSupplemental material 2 for Rationale, design, and baseline participant characteristics in the MRI and cognitive substudy of the cardiovascular outcomes for people using anticoagulation strategies trial by Mukul Sharma, Robert G Hart, Eric E Smith, Jackie Bosch, Fei Yuan, Amparo Casanova, John W Eikelboom, Stuart J Connolly, Gloria Wong, Rafael Diaz, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo, Georg Ertl, Stefan Störk, Gilles R Dagenais, Eva M Lonn, Lars Ryden, Andrew M Tonkin, John D Varigos, Deepak L Bhatt, Kelley RH Branch, Jeffrey L Probstfield, Jae-Hyung Kim, Jong-Won Ha, Martin O’Donnell, Dragos Vinereanu, Keith AA Fox, Yan Liang, Lisheng Liu, Jun Zhu, Nana Pogosova, Aldo P Maggioni, Alvaro Avezum, Leopoldo S Piegas, Katalin Keltai, Matyas Keltai, Nancy Cook Bruns, Scott Berkowitz and Salim Yusuf in International Journal of Stroke</p
- …
