1,720,962 research outputs found
Recensione di Concetta Maria Pagliuca e Filippo Pennacchio (a cura di), Tempora, i tempi verbali nel racconto Vol.1 (Biblion, 2023) e Francesco De Cristofaro, Paolo Giovannetti e Giovanni Maffei (a cura di), Tempora, i tempi verbali nel racconto Vol. 2 (Biblion, 2024)
No full textReview of Concetta Maria Pagliuca e Filippo Pennacchio (a cura di), Tempora, i tempi verbali nel racconto Vol.1. Biblion, 2023; Francesco De Cristofaro, Paolo Giovannetti e Giovanni Maffei (a cura di), Tempora, i tempi verbali nel racconto Vol. 2. Biblion, 2024.Recensione di Concetta Maria Pagliuca e Filippo Pennacchio (a cura di), Tempora, i tempi verbali nel racconto Vol.1. Biblion, 2023; Francesco De Cristofaro, Paolo Giovannetti e Giovanni Maffei (a cura di), Tempora, i tempi verbali nel racconto Vol. 2. Biblion, 2024
Probiotics In Incretin-Based Therapy for Patient Living with Obesity: A Synergistic Approach
No full textThe seXY side of COVID-19: what is behind female protection?
No full textGender distribution of COVID-19 is unbalanced. Higher mortality rates are reported in men (60-70% deaths in men). We briefly point out pros and cons elements for underlying mechanisms. We believe this can offer a point of reflection for further investigations
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Principio di indeterminazione ed effetto tunnel nei tempi verbali. Correlativi formali nella narrazione di Atlante occidentale
No full textAtlante Occidentale di Daniele Del Giudice viene pubblicato nel 1985 dalla casa editrice Einaudi. La stessa casa editrice, dopo due riedizioni, rispettivamente nel 1987 e nel 1998, nel 2019 pubblica una quarta edizione arricchita di una prefazione, firmata da Guido Emilio Tonelli, fisico vincitore del premio Enrico Fermi nel 2013, di un inedito, il «Taccuino di Ginevra», diario della visita preparatoria alla stesura del romanzo compiuta presso l’Organizzazione europea per la ricerca nucleare tra il 7 e il 12 maggio del 1984 e di un testo introduttivo all’inedito, firmato da Enzo Rammairone, curatore dell’edizione. Lo scritto premesso dal curatore al Taccuino, intitolato 1984, tra le altre cose collega la scelta stilistica sull’impiego dei tempi verbali nella narrazione di Atlante occidentale al concetto di “simultaneità” e al racconto lungo Dillon Bay, anch’esso pubblicato per la prima volta nel 1985, ma per lo Stato maggiore dell’Esercito:
[S]imultaneità che l’autore traduce in scrittura, moltipli- cando i tempi verbali (lo farà anche in Atlante occidentale) fino ad accavallarli uno sull’altro come fossero «distanze focali», «profondità di campo».
Tale impiego o moltiplicazione dei tempi verbali in Atlante occidentale viene definito, in questa sede, “alter(n)azione” verbale. La definizione scelta si riferisce al fatto (1) che diversi tempi verbali vengono alternati e (2) che da questa alternazione gli schemi della consecutio temporum risultano alterati, marcando dunque linguisticamente e narrativamente il testo
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
