1,744,220 research outputs found

    David K. Evans, "Information, Governance, and Rural Service Delivery"

    No full text
    David K. Evans POLICY SEMINAR Information, Governance, and Rural Service Delivery Co-Organized by IFPRI and the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM

    Siam and Laos, 1767-1827

    Get PDF
    Article on the history of Thai invasions and rebellions against Vientiane and the Chakri DynastySiam and Laos, 1767-1827 David K. Wyatt Journal of Southeast Asian History Vol. 4, No. 2 (Sep., 1963), pp. 13-3

    David K. Flake letter to his uncle, S. Eugene Flake.

    No full text
    Scan of a handwritten letter dated Feb. 26 [no year, but probably in the early 1960s] from David K. Flake of Provo, Utah, to "Uncle Gene" [S. Eugene Flake], thanking him for providing information for a paper. David would in 1965 complete his master\u27s thesis on the history of Mormon missionary work among the Indians

    Holther, David K.

    No full text
    Holther, David K., House (Weber), 194

    David K. Ehlers

    No full text
    Black and white photograph of David K. Ehlers

    David K. Dawson

    No full text

    Letter of Appreciation to David K. McKie

    Get PDF
    This is a letter of appreciation and thanks to David K. McKie for his service to Texas Eastern University

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore