1,720,970 research outputs found
Pembingkaian Media Online dalam Pemblokiran Situs Islam
Awal tahun 2015, kebebasan pers mengalami ujian. Kebebasan berekspresi dan menyebarkan informasi tergangggu menyusul kebijakan Kemenkominfo yang memblokir sejumlah situs Islam. Pemerintah mengklaim media - media tersebut radikal dan menyebarkan paham ISIS yang dikhawatirkan bisa merusak stabilitas negara dan keharmonisan bangsa. Prokontra pun tidak bisa dihindari. Bahkan media pun tak urung terlibat dalam pembingkaian prokontra atas berita pemblokiran tersebut. Fokus pertanyaan dalam penelitian ini adalah 1) Bagaimana kompas .com dan republika.co.id dalam melakukan pendefimisian masalh terkait pemblikiran situs Islam, 2). Bagimana kompas dan republika.co.id di dalam membuat keputusan moral, 3) Bagimana kompas dan republika dalam memperkirakan sumber penyebab masalah pemblokiran situs Islam? 4) Bagimana kompas dan Republika.co.id di dalam membuat keputusan moral terkait pemblokiran situs Islam? 5) Bagimana kompas.com dan Republika.co.id di dalam memberikan dan menekankan penyelesaian terkait pemblokiran situs Ilam?. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pembingkaian media dalam menyuguhkan berita tentang pemblokiran situs Islam yang dilakukan oleh Kemenkominfo. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan menggunakan metodeanalisis framing model Robert N. Entman. Metode ini dinilai relevan untuk menganalisisnya berita-berita yang dipublikasikan Republika.co.id dan Kompas.com. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, pertama, pendefinisikan masalah pemblokiran situs-situs Islam berbau politis. Kedua, Kompas.com dan Republika.co.id melihat bahwa yang menjadi sumber penyebab masalah pemblokiran adalah dugaan pemerintah yang kurang berdasar. Ketiga, kedua media membuat keputusan moral bahwa situs-situs Islam tersebut tidak terbukti menyebarkan paham ISIS. Keempat, Kompas.com dan Republika.co.id merekomendasikan penyelesaian kasus pemblokiran situs Islam dilakukan dengan melalui musyawarah dan mufakat
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Komunikasi Wartawan dalam Reportase konflik Agama
This study aims to explore the meaning and motives of journalists in reporting on religious conflicts and explore journalists\u27 views on the root causes and solutions of religious disputes. This study uses a qualitative approach; the considerations are expected to produce descriptive data, both written, oral, and the behavior of journalists in reporting. The results show that journalists generally interpret religious conflicts as enjoyable, meaningful, and sensitive events. The motives of journalists to report on religious conflicts are more in the interest of documenting newsworthy events, placing problems in a balanced way, and straightening out information confusion in the community. The causes of conflict occur due to differences in perspectives, misunderstandings, intolerance, excessive fanaticism, weak legal umbrella, government indecision, immature religious understanding, the inability of religious leaders to suppress mass emotions, and the presence of certain interested parties. The conflict solution that must be carried out is the existence of a clear and firm legal settlement umbrella and the importance of dialogue in policy formulation.
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
