11,366 research outputs found

    Katalog der Musikbibliothek Peters ...

    No full text
    Classified, with author indexes.Preface signed: C.F. Peters. Dr. Emil Vogel, bibliothekar.Abth. 1. Theoretische Werke.--Abth. 2. Praktische Werke.Mode of access: Internet

    Robert Peters. Oculus Episcopi

    No full text
    Robert Daniel. Robert Peters. Oculus Episcopi. In: Revue de l'histoire des religions, tome 167, n°2, 1965. pp. 233-235

    Receipt for proportional dividend of the Ohio Company's residuary funds - Andrew Peters

    No full text
    Andrew Peters received from Rufus Putnam, superintendent of the Ohio Company, 32.43,beingtheproportionaldividendforthreesharesintheagencyofBenjaminTupper.OneofthesharesbelongedtoCalvinSmith.Petersalsoreceived32.43, being the proportional dividend for three shares in the agency of Benjamin Tupper. One of the shares belonged to Calvin Smith. Peters also received 5 for fifty acres of land warrant credited to himself and transferred to Daniel Dunham

    An Interview with Doctor Daniel Peters

    No full text
    An up, close and personal interview with Dr. Daniel Peters, retired surgeon, and the current Assis-tant Professor of Cell Biology and Gross Anatomy at NYMC with appointments in both the Medical School and the School of Health Sciences and Practices

    A history of the Rev. Hugh Peters.

    No full text
    Contains a genealogical account of William Peters of Boston, and of his descendants: p. [109]-155.Mode of access: Internet

    Comparatio inter Prophetam Danielem & Johannem Baptistam Instituta, & ad Virum Summe Reverend: Doctiss: [et] Spectatissimum Dominum DMN: Johannem Danielem Bütemeisterum, Theologum ... : [Gedächtnisschrift auf Johann Daniel Bütemeister, gest. 23. Dez. 1722] / Applicata ab Hermanno Henrico Peters, Pastore ad D. Albani, Ministerii sui Ecless: anno xxi

    No full text
    COMPARATIO INTER PROPHETAM DANIELEM & JOHANNEM BAPTISTAM INSTITUTA, & AD VIRUM SUMME REVEREND: DOCTISS: [ET] SPECTATISSIMUM DOMINUM DMN: JOHANNEM DANIELEM BÜTEMEISTERUM, THEOLOGUM ... : [GEDÄCHTNISSCHRIFT AUF JOHANN DANIEL BÜTEMEISTER, GEST. 23. DEZ. 1722] / APPLICATA AB HERMANNO HENRICO PETERS, PASTORE AD D. ALBANI, MINISTERII SUI ECLESS: ANNO XXI Comparatio inter Prophetam Danielem & Johannem Baptistam Instituta, & ad Virum Summe Reverend: Doctiss: [et] Spectatissimum Dominum DMN: Johannem Danielem Bütemeisterum, Theologum ... : [Gedächtnisschrift auf Johann Daniel Bütemeister, gest. 23. Dez. 1722] / Applicata ab Hermanno Henrico Peters, Pastore ad D. Albani, Ministerii sui Ecless: anno xxi (1) Titelblatt (1) Text (3

    Aunty Dot Peters - Truth and Reconciliation

    No full text
    In this biofilm, Aunty Dot Peters discusses her connections to culture, her family, and the Australia she loves. With her son, Dr Andrew Peters, they throw a light on the truths behind being Indigenous Australians past, present and future, and talk about reconnecting with their own ancestry and promoting cultural awareness to the wider community

    Peters featured in PolitiFact

    No full text
    Assistant Professor Jonathan Peters was featured in PolitiFact regarding libel laws and the First Amendment. The article titled Trump\u27s promise to \u27open up our libel laws\u27 is Stalled was written by Daniel Funke and published 7/15/20. Read the articl

    Threatening communication: a critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory

    No full text
    Despite decades of research, consensus regarding the dynamics of fear appeals remains elusive. A meta-analysis was conducted that was designed to resolve this controversy. Publications that were included in previous meta-analyses were re-analysed, and a number of additional publications were located. The inclusion criteria were full factorial orthogonal manipulations of threat and efficacy, and measurement of behaviour as an outcome. Fixed and random effects models were used to compute mean effect size estimates. Meta-analysis of the six studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria clearly showed a significant interaction between threat and efficacy, such that threat only had an effect under high efficacy (d = 0.31), and efficacy only had an effect under high threat (d = 0.71). Inconsistency in results regarding the effectiveness of threatening communication can likely be attributed to flawed methodology. Proper tests of fear appeal theory yielded the theoretically hypothesised interaction effect. Threatening communication should exclusively be used when pilot studies indicate that an intervention successfully enhances efficacy
    corecore