1,722,398 research outputs found

    Struggling for Context: An Appraisal of “Struggling for Air”

    No full text
    In their recent book, Struggling for Air, Ricky Revesz and Jack Lienke argue that the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970 contained a "tragic flaw": the failure to require national emissions standards for existing coal-fired power plants. They blame this flaw on a "missing of the mark," primarily by Senator Edmund Muskie, the chief Senate sponsor of the 1970 Amendments. I suggest instead that the technological and political context of the 1970 Amendments explains why the flaw exists, and that the failure to include national standards for coal-fired power plants is an error that can be seen only in retrospect.Please direct any questions about this deposit to me, as the authorized depositor. Thanks

    Prevention of Significant Deterioration: A Scalpel, Not an Axe

    No full text
    Does the United States need the Clean Air Act’s Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program to guard against degradation of air quality? In their recent Comment in these pages, John C. Evans and Donald van der Vaart say no, but the right answer is more nuanced. While the program is flawed in some respects, PSD helps to protect national parklands, guard against pollution “hot spots,” and decrease air pollution emission levels in the United States, thus helping to remedy regional pollution problems.Please direct any questions about this deposit to me as the authorized depositor

    Craig N. Hodges and Deborah R. Hodges in a Faculty Recital

    Get PDF
    This is the program for the faculty recital of bass-baritone Craig N. Hodges and pianist Deborah R. Hodges. This recital took place on January 14, 1988, in the Mabee Fine Arts Center Recital Hall

    Twentieth Centuray Art Music of the Americas: David Dennis and Craig N. Hodges in a Faculty Recital

    Get PDF
    This is the program for The Twentieth Century Art Music of the Americas, the faculty recital featuring pianist David Dennis and bass-baritone Craig N. Hodges. This recital took place on September 12, 1989, in the Mabee Recital Hall

    Craig, N

    No full text

    Craig, N W, NX2632

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/379361Surname: CRAIG Given Name(s) or Initials: N W Military Service Number or Last Known Location: NX2632 Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 3336193173 Item: [2016.0049.11654] "Craig, N W, NX2632

    Craig, N H, 420154

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/379351Surname: CRAIG Given Name(s) or Initials: N H Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 420154 Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 51883193163 Item: [2016.0049.11644] "Craig, N H, 420154

    Oren, Craig N.

    No full text

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore