1,721,466 research outputs found
No inherent association between minor mutations in HIV protease at baseline and selection of the L90M mutation at the time of the first virological failure [1] (multiple letters)
[No abstract available
The degree of viral suppression predicts the probability of accumulating new drug-mutations at virological failure to the first PI-HAART regimen
An observational study on patients treated or not for acute HIV infection.
BACKGROUND:
A vast majority of HIV-infected subjects who experience HIV acute seroconversion actually receive treatment. Open questions are how can we identify patients who will be slow progressors or long-term non progressors, and, as a consequence, do not require treatment.
METHODS:
An observational retrospective study on patients who experienced acute HIV seroconversion from August 1995 to June 2001, who are still alive and followed as outpatients at the Clinic of Infectious Diseases of Modena, Italy.
RESULTS:
Twelve patients were studied. Five patients (45.4%) were treated during acute seroconversion, while 7 were not treated. Two of these seven subjects received antiretroviral treatment 12 and 26 weeks after acute seroconversion. All the untreated patients were in good viro-immunological condition 6 months after seroconversion, and 2 of them also after 3 and 7 years. Patients who were treated showed a significant daily increase in CD4/CD8 T cell ratio with longer time spent on therapy (0.04% increase per day longer on antiretroviral therapy, p=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS:
This study suggests that treatment during primary HIV infection should not be considered in all patients. Randomized clinical trials enrolling patients with an asymptomatic primary HIV infection, with a high CD4 count and low HIV plasma viremia are needed to evaluate the indications for treatment in this subgroup of patients. On the other hand, this study confirms the good viro-immunological response obtained after treating patients during primary HIV infection
Predicting the magnitude of short-term CD4+ T-cell recovery in HIV-infected patients during first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy
BACKGROUND: The extent of short-term CD4(+) T-cell recovery in patients tolerating first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and attaining undetectable HIV RNA levels is inadequately defined.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients in four Italian cohorts who started HAART between January 1996 and September 2006. All patients had known HCV coinfection status, did not modify the regimen for 6 months and had <50 HIV RNA copies/ml at the end of the sixth month.
RESULTS: The analysis involved 1,488 patients (1,096 males, 73.7%) with a median age of 43 years (interquartile range [IQR] 39-49); 435 (29.2%) were positive for HCV, 71 (4.8%) were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and 76 (5.1%) had experienced a previous AIDS-defining event. At baseline, patient CD4(+) T-cell counts were 226 cells/microl (IQR 99-332), CD4(+) T-cell percentages were 14.7% (IQR 8.7-21.2) and HIV RNA levels were 4.91 log(10) copies/ml (IQR 4.38-5.34). Overall, 24-week CD4(+) T-cell recovery was 144 cells/microl (IQR 70-240). At multivariable analysis, T-cell recovery was positively related to the use of a boosted protease inhibitor (P<0.0001) or thymidine analogues (P<0.0001), baseline HIV RNA levels (P<0.0001), the baseline percentage of CD4(+) T-cells (P<0.0001) and the absence of HCV coinfection (P=0.006). Age, gender, baseline CD4(+)/CD8(+) T-cell ratio and a history of AIDS-defining events had no independent effect on CD4(+) T-cell recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: Among HIV-infected patients tolerating first-line HAART and with undetectable HIV RNA after 6 months, CD4(+) T-cell recovery is significantly greater in those without HCV coinfection, with a high baseline viral load, a high baseline percentage of CD4(+) T-cells and in those treated with a boosted protease inhibitor
Response to HAART and GB virus type C coinfection in a cohort of antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected individuals.
Plasma viral load concentrations in women and men from different exposure categories and with known duration of HIV infection.
Co-administration of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors and rate of tenofovir discontinuation in clinical practice.
INTRODUCTION:
In clinical trials, toxicity leading to discontinuation of tenofovir (TDF) is a rare occurrence (3% by two years)[1, 2]; however, in clinical practice it seems to be higher. Previous studies suggested that TDF toxicity is higher when it is co-administered with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PI/r)[3, 4]. The aim of this study is to assess the rate of TDF discontinuations in clinical practice and to explore associated factors.
METHODS:
All previously antiretroviral-naïve patients initiating a TDF-containing regimen were selected from the ICONA cohort, unless they were positive for hepatitis B. The primary outcome was TDF discontinuation (>30 days) regardless of the reason, the secondary was TDF discontinuation due to toxicity. All analyses were repeated for the isolated stop of TDF (no stop of associated drugs). The main reason for discontinuation as reported by the treating physicians was used to classify stops. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were used.
RESULTS:
A total of 3,303 naïve patients were enrolled: 674 (20.4%) were female, the median age was 38 years (32-45), 55% were on PI/r-based regimen and 45% on NNRTI; 80% of calculated estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) were >90 ml/min. The probability of discontinuation of TDF regardless of the reason was 10% (95% CI 8-11) at two years, 20% by eight years. The causes of discontinuation were: toxicity (33%), failure (10%), non-adherence (21%), simplification (16%) and other/unknown causes (20%). The five-year KM estimates in the PI/r vs. not PI/r groups were 23% vs. 10%, respectively (log-rank p=0.0001), for the outcome of stopping regardless of the reason, and 8% vs. 4% (p=0.18) for discontinuation due to toxicity. In a multivariable Cox model, PI/r use and lower body weight were associated with increased risk of discontinuing TDF regardless of the reason; lower eGFR at baseline was associated with TDF discontinuation for toxicity and PI/r use was associated with isolated stop of TDF (Figure). No differences in rates of TDF discontinuations between PIs were found.
CONCLUSION:
In our cohort, the observed frequency of TDF discontinuations was low although higher than estimated in clinical trials (10% by two years). Co-administration of TDF with PI/r was associated with an increased rate of TDF discontinuations. This finding should guide further investigations of the mechanism that may have led to discontinuation of TDF in patients using PI/r
- …
