1,720,972 research outputs found
Estimation and computations for Gaussian mixtures with uniform noise under separation constraints
No full textIn this paper we study a finite Gaussian mixture model with an additional uniform component that has the role to catch points in the tails of the data distribution. An adaptive constraint enforces a certain level of separation between the Gaussian mixture components and the uniform component representing noise and outliers in the tail of the distribution. The latter makes the proposed tool particularly useful for robust estimation and outlier identification. A constrained ML estimator is introduced for which existence and consistency is shown. One of the attractive features of the methodology is that the noise level is estimated from data. We also develop an EM-type algorithm with proven convergence. Based on numerical evidence we show how the methods developed in this paper are useful for several fundamental data analysis tasks: outlier identification, robust location-scale estimation, clustering, and density estimation
An adequacy approach for deciding the number of clusters for OTRIMLE robust Gaussian mixture-based clustering
No full textWe introduce a new approach to deciding the number of clusters. The approach is applied to Optimally Tuned Robust Improper Maximum Likelihood Estimation (OTRIMLE; Coretto & Hennig, Journal of the American Statistical Association111, 1648–1659) of a Gaussian mixture model allowing for observations to be classified as ‘noise’, but it can be applied to other clustering methods as well. The quality of a clustering is assessed by a statistic Q that measures how close the within-cluster distributions are to elliptical unimodal distributions that have the only mode in the mean. This non-parametric measure allows for non-Gaussian clusters as long as they have a good quality according to Q. The simplicity of a model is assessed by a measure S that prefers a smaller number of clusters unless additional clusters can reduce the estimated noise proportion substantially. The simplest model is then chosen that is adequate for the data in the sense that its observed value of Q is not significantly larger than what is expected for data truly generated from the fitted model, as can be assessed by parametric bootstrap. The approach is compared with model-based clustering using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and the integrated complete likelihood (ICL) in a simulation study and on real two data sets
Robust Improper Maximum Likelihood: Tuning, Computation, and a Comparison With Other Methods for Robust Gaussian Clustering
Full text linkThe two main topics of this paper are the introduction of the “optimally tuned improper
maximum likelihood estimator” (OTRIMLE) for robust clustering based on the multivariate
Gaussian model for clusters, and a comprehensive simulation study comparing the OTRIMLE
to Maximum Likelihood in Gaussian mixtures with and without noise component, mixtures of
t-distributions, and the TCLUST approach for trimmed clustering. The OTRIMLE uses an im-
proper constant density for modelling outliers and noise. This can be chosen optimally so that
the non-noise part of the data looks as close to a Gaussian mixture as possible. Some deviation
from Gaussianity can be traded in for lowering the estimated noise proportion. Covariance ma-
trix constraints and computation of the OTRIMLE are also treated. In the simulation study, all
methods are confronted with setups in which their model assumptions are not exactly fulfilled,
and in order to evaluate the experiments in a standardized way by misclassification rates, a new
model-based definition of “true clusters” is introduced that deviates from the usual identifica-
tion of mixture components with clusters. In the study, every method turns out to be superior
for one or more setups, but the OTRIMLE achieves the most satisfactory overall performance.
The methods are also applied to two real datasets, one without and one with known “true”
clusters
An adequacy approach for deciding the number of clusters for OTRIMLE robust Gaussian mixture‐based clustering
Full text linkWe introduce a new approach to deciding the number of clusters. The approach is applied to Optimally Tuned Robust Improper Maximum Likelihood Estimation (OTRIMLE; Coretto & Hennig, Journal of the American Statistical Association111, 1648-1659) of a Gaussian mixture model allowing for observations to be classified as 'noise', but it can be applied to other clustering methods as well. The quality of a clustering is assessed by a statistic Q that measures how close the within-cluster distributions are to elliptical unimodal distributions that have the only mode in the mean. This non-parametric measure allows for non-Gaussian clusters as long as they have a good quality according to Q. The simplicity of a model is assessed by a measure S that prefers a smaller number of clusters unless additional clusters can reduce the estimated noise proportion substantially. The simplest model is then chosen that is adequate for the data in the sense that its observed value of Q is not significantly larger than what is expected for data truly generated from the fitted model, as can be assessed by parametric bootstrap. The approach is compared with model-based clustering using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and the integrated complete likelihood (ICL) in a simulation study and on real two data sets
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
