1,720,980 research outputs found
LingSync: web-based software for language documentation
LingSync is a suite of open source web-based tools that facilitate a) collaborative linguistic fieldwork and language documentation and b) theoretical analysis and revitalization efforts. It enables and entices fieldworkers and documenters with diverse goals to work together to mutual advantage.
Linguistic fieldwork and language documentation are the foundation that sustains theoretical linguistics and language revitalization. While academics, educators, and language activists may spend considerable time and energy in documenting endangered languages, the fruits of these labours are largely inaccessible. In the context of endangered languages, missed opportunities for data-sharing and collaboration are particularly problematic.
LingSync strives to improve this state of affairs, primarily by building the infrastructure necessary for fieldworkers and documenters to collaborate and reuse one another’s data ethically and efficiently. LingSync is a set of web services and cross-platform user interfaces that facilitate the creation of multi-authored corpora that are searchable, accessible, consistent, and richly annotated.
LingSync advances the state of the art in fieldwork and documentation methodology by virtue of the following: (i) its application programming interfaces (APIs) facilitate the repurposing of data; (ii) its browser-based graphical user interfaces (GUIs) are user-friendly and function across all major platforms; (iii) its import/export features allow for interoperability with other tools and representations; (iv) its advanced and domain-relevant search interfaces allow for timely retrieval of relevant data and discovery of novel patterns; (v) its inventory-based input validation, orthography conversion, and morpho-lexical cross-referencing features promote representational consistency; (vi) its authentication, authorization, and encryption features allow for conscientious and highly configurable control over data access; (vii) its audio/video integration and attendant feature set assist in the parsing and alignment of audio and textual representations; and, finally, (vii) its morpho-phonological model implementation features allow for the empirical testing of grammatical components and the creation of analyzers to automate and expedite various data-creation tasks.
The presentation will review three examples of how this software has been used for pedagogy, theory building, and revitalization: a collaborative research project on Blackfoot (Algonquian, Alberta, Canada and Montana, USA), another on Mi'gmaq (Algonquian, Quebec, Canada) conducted by the Mi'gmaq Research Partnership, and a third involving the construction of a Chuj (Mayan) database. Collectively, these case studies evince the benefits of LingSync in the following respects: the computational implementation of theoretical analyses, the advancement of academic research, the creation of second-language teaching materials, and the building of substantial databases on under-documented languages, even by relatively inexperienced student fieldworkers
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Student perspectives on Mi'gmaq language-learning through multi-modal teaching: A community-linguistics partnership
This paper aims to share the experiences of heritage Mi’gmaq language learners who engaged in a summer Mi'gmaq-as-a-second-language class. Also participating in the class were linguists collaborating with the teachers to document and expand the multi-modal teaching method to a digital platform. In this method, teachers Mary Ann Metallic and Janice Vicaire fostered an atmosphere of equality between themselves and the students. The students were encouraged to learn horizontally from each other, as well as from the speakers around them in their day-to- day life.
The method combines pictures, speaking, and minimal text in an optimally-challenging environment. The pictures encourage students to leave English outside the classroom and reduce the amount of word-to-word translation, thereby diminishing English's status as the default communicative language. There was no strict syllabus and the teachings catered to the students, focusing on material they wanted to learn. The absence of grading relieves the habitual school-related pressure to perform; students are self-motivated. This method could be extended to other Algonquian languages because of its effectiveness in simplifying polysyntheticity (see e.g. Baker 1996), and because it reflects the primarily oral status of the language in the community.
The linguists made the following contributions to the program: (i) documentation of the program and adaptation into a digital platform; (ii) connecting intuitive speaker knowledge to meta- linguistic information about formal grammatical patterns; and (iii) documentation of the language for linguistic research and community interests. Linguistic research informed the data structure of the complementary digital program, developed to both complement the in-class instruction, as well as to increase accessibility for students living outside of the community.
In our presentation, we introduce the method, its strengths and weaknesses as experienced by students, and provide suggestions for the implementation of such a program in your own community
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
