1,721,089 research outputs found
Introduction : towards a better understanding of match-fixing
No full textThis introductory chapter sets the stage for the individual contributions of this edited volume. First, showing that much existing match-fixing research is mainly empirical in nature and indicating that many of the current theoretically informed studies are too heavily relying on rational choice theory only, we outline some of the major limitations of the existing match-fixing literature. Second, we argue that theoretically informed studies on match-fixing are required to not only describe but also better contextualize, understand, and explain match-fixing. Third and finally, we discuss the individual contributions and argue why and how associated insights bear scientific and/or practical utility and can help inform match-fixing research, practice, and education
The present and future understanding of match-fixing : exploring the building blocks of match-fixing theory
No full textThis concluding chapter discusses how the contributions of this edited volume help better understand match-fixing in sport. Building on the four core elements or building blocks of theory development, this chapter outlines how this edited volume supports novel insights into the what?, how?, why?, and who, where, and when? questions related to match-fixing. Taken together, these contributions provide a polyphony of viewpoints on match-fixing. In doing so, we have pushed the agenda for diverse perspectives from differing contexts, backgrounds, and theoretical standings to be examined in the future, while offering suggestions of areas that could be explored in future academic work on match-fixing
Understanding match-fixing from a normalization perspective
No full textMatch-fixing has presented itself as a contested and widespread threat to the integrity of sport. Although sport corruption research, whereof match-fixing is one of the most compelling examples, has increased during the past decades, the research field is still under-theorized. Due to the multifaceted and complex nature of match-fixing, several scholars have argued that a multilevel approach is needed to get a better understanding of match-fixing. Guided by normalization of corruption theory, this chapter provides a more holistic and nuanced approach to better understand match-fixing and its underlying mechanisms. By demonstrating how (a) institutionalization, (b) rationalization, and (c) socialization mechanisms can help explain the frequently embedded, perpetuated, and taken-for-granted nature of match-fixing, this chapter offers theoretical guidance on how to conduct future research on this complex phenomenon
The present and future understanding of match-fixing: Exploring the building blocks of match-fixing theory
No full textThis concluding chapter discusses how the contributions of this edited volume help better understand match-fixing in sport. Building on the four core elements or building blocks of theory development, this chapter outlines how this edited volume supports novel insights into the what?, how?, why?, and who, where, and when? questions related to match-fixing. Taken together, these contributions provide a polyphony of viewpoints on match-fixing. In doing so, we have pushed the agenda for diverse perspectives from differing contexts, backgrounds, and theoretical standings to be examined in the future, while offering suggestions of areas that could be explored in future academic work on match-fixing
Introduction to the special issue: The different faces of corruption and organised crime in sport
No full textThis special issue on “The Different Faces of Corruption and Organised Crime in Sport”, aims to shed light on the multifaceted nature of criminal activities that have infiltrated sport at all levels—from grassroots competitions to elite professional leagues. At the same time, specific attention is paid to the role of endogenous actors, threatening the integrity of and in sport from within the sport ecosystem. Hence, this special issue criticises and expands the dominant narrative that sport is a pristine industry that is merely jeopardised by external, ‘mafia type’ actors. Showing that the scope of organised crime in sport is diverse and complex, reflecting the evolving tactics of criminal organisations as they adapt to new regulatory landscapes, technological advances, and shifting market dynamics, this special issue pushes the envelope in grasping that sport and corruption are more intertwined than openly admitted in both academia and practice
A Legal Perspective on Match-Fixing
No full textMatch-fixing has been a scourge in sport from the earliest days of organized competition. The implications of match-fixing are extensive, and a multitude of legal strategies have been applied in response. There is an enduring question as to how and to what extent the law should involve itself with the regulation of sport. The regulation of on-field (e.g., arena, rink) activity has traditionally been viewed as the domain of sport organizations. However, match-fixing is one of a few areas where external authorities have long been involved. The ties between match-fixing and organized crime are such that manipulating sporting outcomes is rarely an incident that affects sport alone. The rise in global match-fixing has brought with it differing legal strategies to combat the practice. Some nation-states have chosen to pass legislation directly targeting match-fixing, while other countries have defaulted to existing legislation that prohibits crimes like fraud or corruption. One of the challenges in arresting the spread of match-fixing has been crafting laws that incentivize cooperation in investigations because victims often fear harm in association with their giving assistance. Overall, match-fixing is a complex threat to sport integrity with numerous barriers ensuring that the quest for legal remedy remains elusive
Towards a Better Understanding of Match-Fixing
No full textThis introductory chapter sets the stage for the individual contributions of this edited volume. First, showing that much existing match-fixing research is mainly empirical in nature and indicating that many of the current theoretically informed studies are too heavily relying on rational choice theory only, we outline some of the major limitations of the existing match-fixing literature. Second, we argue that theoretically informed studies on match-fixing are required to not only describe but also better contextualize, understand, and explain match-fixing. Third and finally, we discuss the individual contributions and argue why and how associated insights bear scientific and/or practical utility and can help inform match-fixing research, practice, and education
The blurry line between winning and losing : a multi-method approach to evidence-based prevention of fraud in sports
No full text
- …
