117,333 research outputs found
Les conditions du discours: La critique des sophistes dans l'"Hippias majeur" et l'"Euthydème"
L'objectif de ce travail est de dégager les motifs et les enjeux de la critique platonicienne des sophistes dans l'Hippias majeur et l'Euthydème. On y montre d'abord que le motif de la critique platonicienne réside dans son opposition à la conception élémentaire et matérielle de l'unité que défend Hippias dans le dialogue éponyme, en regard de laquelle le concept d'"unité formelle" est avancé. Cette opposition ontologique sur le rapport de l'un au multiple est complexifiée par les objections epistémologiques des sophistes de l' Euthydème qui révèlent les antinomies indépassables auxquelles se bute le discours. Pour sortir de cette impasse epistémologique, on resitue l'opposition de Socrate aux sophistes sur le plan éthique et on dévoile son enjeu. En niant l'"unité formelle", la doctrine sophistique s'interdit la possibilité d'un savoir unifié sur le beau et, par conséquent, ne peut remplir sa promesse éthique de pouvoir enseigner l'excellence humaine
Les conditions du discours: La critique des sophistes dans l'"Hippias majeur" et l'"Euthydème"
L'objectif de ce travail est de dégager les motifs et les enjeux de la critique platonicienne des sophistes dans l'Hippias majeur et l'Euthydème. On y montre d'abord que le motif de la critique platonicienne réside dans son opposition à la conception élémentaire et matérielle de l'unité que défend Hippias dans le dialogue éponyme, en regard de laquelle le concept d'"unité formelle" est avancé. Cette opposition ontologique sur le rapport de l'un au multiple est complexifiée par les objections epistémologiques des sophistes de l' Euthydème qui révèlent les antinomies indépassables auxquelles se bute le discours. Pour sortir de cette impasse epistémologique, on resitue l'opposition de Socrate aux sophistes sur le plan éthique et on dévoile son enjeu. En niant l'"unité formelle", la doctrine sophistique s'interdit la possibilité d'un savoir unifié sur le beau et, par conséquent, ne peut remplir sa promesse éthique de pouvoir enseigner l'excellence humaine
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Square Dancing with the Stars to Enhance Dynamic Hirschman Linkages?
In this Presidential Address, the author takes the reader on a reconnaissance of his life and time as a regional scientist. He points out scenery he found scintillating along the way, hoping that some may pick up the banner and chew on a few of the ideas for a while. He suggests a revisit to Albert O. Hirschman’s notion of key sectors and more empirical analysis related to Marcus Berliant’s and Masahisa Fujita’s notion of knowledge creation and transfer.Presidential Address, San Antonio, Texas, March 29, 2014 (53rd Meetings of the Southern Regional Science Association
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Trading convexity for scalability
Convex learning algorithms, such as Support Vector Machines (SVMs), are often seen as highly desirable because they offer strong practical properties and are amenable to theoretical analysis. However, in this work we show how non-convexity can provide scalability advantages over convexity. We show how concave-convex programming can be applied to produce (i) faster SVMs where training errors are no longer support vectors, and (ii) much faster Transductive SVMs. 1
Letter from unknown writer to Jesse L. Boyce
Letter to Jesse L. Boyce from unknown author (possibly Jack) about the investigation into the powder magazine located in the Grand Canyon. Some personal news is included in the letter such as the writer's marriage to the daughter of C.A. Taylor, former Supervisor of Cochise County
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
