126,438 research outputs found
Lo pseudo-dialogo della Cognizione. Accertamenti filologici, ragioni critiche e genetiche. Testi e apparati
No full textil saggio (di CLELIA MARTIGNONI) analizza le ragioni per cui Gadda include lo pseudo-dialogo nella prima edizione della "Cognizione" (1963). Gadda esplora alcuni concetti-chiave: il barocco, le ossessioni di Gonzalo, i rapporti familiari. Trascrizione e apparato (di BARBARA COLLI) di due stesure precedenti (Fondo Roscioni, Trivulziana) e loro comment
Appendix B: Lectura Thomasina, Lib. II, dist. 12, q. 1
No full textIn Lectura Thomasina's Book II, dist. 12, q. 1, William of Peter of Godin focuses on the nature of celestial bodies. This text constitutes an irrefutable example of the interrelation between Godin's position and the Anonymous Brugensis, examined by Maxime Mauriège in his article
Due rive ci vogliono: 47 traduzioni inedite
No full textDue rive ci vogliono per la verità: per la nostra andata, per il nostro ritorno. Strade che bevano le loro nebbie. Che serbino intatte le nostre risate felici. Che, interrotte, ancora salvaguardino i nostri minori a nuoto in acque gelide.
L’antologia Due rive ci vogliono pubblica per la prima volta quarantasette poesie del grande poeta francese René Char (1907-1988) nelle traduzioni di Vittorio Sereni (1913-1983) i cui originali si trovano presso l’Archivio «Vittorio Sereni» della Biblioteca comunale di Luino. Le poesie sono introdotte dal testo del discorso – anch’esso inedito – Il mio lavoro su Char, pronunciato da Sereni nel 1976 quando gli fu conferito il Premio Monselice per la traduzione. Completano il volume una nota di Pier Vincenzo Mengaldo e una postfazione di Elisa Donzelli che ha anche curato l’apparato critico con la collaborazione di Barbara Colli, responsabile dell’Archivio «Vittorio Sereni» di Luino
Ownership and performance in European big business: the longitudinal perspective
No full textThis chapter assesses the relationship between the prevalent ownership structures of the largest European companies and their performance from a long-term perspective. It explicitly refers to the main analytical frameworks dealing with the subject:
(a) The ‘varieties of capitalism’ approach, which emphasizes the persistence over time of different typologies of capitalist systems and thus of ownership structures generated from different institutional frameworks.
(b) The corporate governance approach, dealing with the models of governance proper of the large corporations—basically the shareholder-value theory and the stakeholder models.
(c) The corporate finance approach, which focuses on the causal relation between ownership structure and performances—an approach going back to Berle and Means’ seminal research.
(d) The ‘strategy–structure–ownership’ approach, which emphasizes the relevance of strategic and structural/organizational variables in determining the outcome in terms of performance—whatever its measure
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Therapist interventions and ruptures and resolutions of therapeutic alliance in anaclitic and introjective patients
No full textThis study explores the relationship between therapist’s interventions and ruptures and resolutions processes of therapeutic alliance in anaclitic and introjective patients. We also present the revised version of the Collaborative Interactions Scale Revised (CIS-R; Colli, Gentile, Condino, & Lingiardi, 2017), an observerrated measure for the assessment of therapeutic-alliance ruptures and resolutions. Our aim is to investigate the impact of the therapist’s techniques on the (a) ruptures markers and (b) collaborative processes in two groups of patients. Specifically, we hypothesize the effects of these therapist’s interventions: (a) The focus on the relationship and/or affects are predictive of the collaborative processes in anaclitic patients and of the indirect rupture markers in the introjective patients; (b) the intervention on insight and/or defenses and/or recurrent patterns are predictive of the collaborations in the introjective patients and on the direct rupture markers in the anaclitic patients. Method: three raters conducted a blind evaluation of a sample of 130 sessions (390 segments; 7,214 narrative units) with 65 patients (33 had an anaclitic orientation and 32 had a introjective orientation). Measures: Collaborative Interactions Scale Revised (CIS-R; Colli, et al., 2014, 2017) to evaluate the ruptures and collaborative processes in the session; Comparative Psychotherapy Process Scale (CPPS; Hilsenroth et al., 2005; Gentile & Tanzilli, 2015) to assess therapist’s interventions; Prototype Matching of Anaclitic–Introjective Personality Configuration (PMAI; Werbart & Levander, 2014, 2016) for the assessment of the anaclitic and introjective; Psychodynamic Functioning Scale (PFS; Høglend et al., 2000, 2006, 2008) for the evaluation of the patient’s level of functioning. Results: The linear regression evidenced that the focus on affects interventions are predictive of collaborative process in anaclitic patients only in presence of high level of functioning (b=.683, sig.=.001). The focus on the relationship are predictive of collaborative processes both in anaclitic (b=.472, sig.=.000) and introjective patients (b=.389, sig.=.05) in presence of low level of functioning. The interventions focused on insight (b=.541, sig.=.000) and defenses (b=.767, sig.=.005) are predictive of collaborative process in introjective patients with a high level of functioning. Conclusions: The application of the scale seems to confirm that3⁄4as evidenced by the former version (Colli & Lingiardi, 2009)3⁄4 also the CIS-R is a reliable rating system that is useful for both empirical research and clinical assessments. The data seem suggesting the differential impact of therapist techniques according patient’s characteristic and focusing the importance of the tailoring in order to promote patient’s collaboration in session. Clinical implications of these results will be discussed
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
It is time to revisit the theory of acute conduction block: efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound epicardial ablation
No full textAssessing ruptures and resolutions of therapeutic alliance in patients with and without personality disorders
No full textThis study presents the revised version of the Collaborative Interactions Scale (CISR; Colli, Gentile, Condino, & Lingiardi, 2017), an observer-rated measure for the assessment of therapeutic-alliance ruptures and resolutions. Aim: Our aim is to assess differences in the presence of alliance ruptures and resolutions in relation to patient’s diagnosis. Specifically, we hypothesize that the focus on the affects is different in the sessions of patients with and without personality disorders (PDs). Method: three raters conducted a blind evaluation of a sample of 130 sessions (390 segments; 7,214 narrative units) with 65 patients (33 had a PD diagnosis and 32 had a DSM–5 clinical syndrome diagnosis without a PD). Results: The ANOVA evidenced that the patients with PDs showed a greater number of alliance ruptures and a smaller number of collaborative processes than patients without PDs. Moreover, the non-PD patients are characterized by: (a) a major frequency of the patient’s communications focused on the affects (F = 4.002; sig. = .048) and (b) a higher number of therapists’ interventions on the affects (F = 4.116; sig. = .045) than PD patients. Conclusions: The application of the scale seems to confirm thatas evidenced by the former version (CIS; Colli & Lingiardi, 2009) also the CISR is a reliable rating system that is useful for both empirical research and clinical assessments
- …
